Cargando…

Data sharing: experience of accessing individual patient data from completed randomised controlled trials in vascular and cognitive medicine

OBJECTIVES: Meta-analysis based on individual patient data (IPD) from randomised trials is superior to using published summary data since it facilitates subgroup and multiple variable analyses. Guidelines and funders expect that researchers share IPD for bona fide analyses, but in practice, this is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scutt, Polly, Woodhouse, Lisa J, Montgomery, Alan A, Bath, Philip M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7482449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32912955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038765
_version_ 1783580790020374528
author Scutt, Polly
Woodhouse, Lisa J
Montgomery, Alan A
Bath, Philip M
author_facet Scutt, Polly
Woodhouse, Lisa J
Montgomery, Alan A
Bath, Philip M
author_sort Scutt, Polly
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Meta-analysis based on individual patient data (IPD) from randomised trials is superior to using published summary data since it facilitates subgroup and multiple variable analyses. Guidelines and funders expect that researchers share IPD for bona fide analyses, but in practice, this is done variably. Here, we report the experience of obtaining IPD for two collaborative analysis studies. SETTING: Two linked studies required IPD from published randomised trials. The leading researchers for eligible trials were approached and asked to share IPD including trial characteristics, patient demographics, baseline clinical data and outcome measures. PARTICIPANTS: Participants in eligible randomised controlled trials included patients with or at risk of cognitive decline/vascular events. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Numbers (%) of trials where the leading researcher responded favourably/negatively or did not respond. If negative, reasons behind the response were collected. If positive, methods used to share IPD were recorded. RESULTS: Across the two studies, 391 completed trials were identified. Email addresses for researchers were found for 313 (80%) of the trials. One hundred and forty-eight (47%) researchers did not respond despite being sent multiple emails. Following contact, positive initial responses were received from 92 researchers, resulting in IPD being shared for 78 trials. Eighty-seven (28%) researchers declined to share data; justifications were recorded. The median time from first request to accessing data in one study was 241 (IQR 383.3) days. IPD sources included: direct from researcher, via academic trial funders repository and a website requiring remote analysis of commercial data. Where data were shared, a variety of methods were used to transfer data. CONCLUSION: Sharing of IPD from trials is desirable and a requirement of many funding bodies. However, accessing IPD faces multiple challenges including refusals to share, delays in access to data and having to perform analyses on a remote website. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7482449
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74824492020-09-18 Data sharing: experience of accessing individual patient data from completed randomised controlled trials in vascular and cognitive medicine Scutt, Polly Woodhouse, Lisa J Montgomery, Alan A Bath, Philip M BMJ Open Research Methods OBJECTIVES: Meta-analysis based on individual patient data (IPD) from randomised trials is superior to using published summary data since it facilitates subgroup and multiple variable analyses. Guidelines and funders expect that researchers share IPD for bona fide analyses, but in practice, this is done variably. Here, we report the experience of obtaining IPD for two collaborative analysis studies. SETTING: Two linked studies required IPD from published randomised trials. The leading researchers for eligible trials were approached and asked to share IPD including trial characteristics, patient demographics, baseline clinical data and outcome measures. PARTICIPANTS: Participants in eligible randomised controlled trials included patients with or at risk of cognitive decline/vascular events. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Numbers (%) of trials where the leading researcher responded favourably/negatively or did not respond. If negative, reasons behind the response were collected. If positive, methods used to share IPD were recorded. RESULTS: Across the two studies, 391 completed trials were identified. Email addresses for researchers were found for 313 (80%) of the trials. One hundred and forty-eight (47%) researchers did not respond despite being sent multiple emails. Following contact, positive initial responses were received from 92 researchers, resulting in IPD being shared for 78 trials. Eighty-seven (28%) researchers declined to share data; justifications were recorded. The median time from first request to accessing data in one study was 241 (IQR 383.3) days. IPD sources included: direct from researcher, via academic trial funders repository and a website requiring remote analysis of commercial data. Where data were shared, a variety of methods were used to transfer data. CONCLUSION: Sharing of IPD from trials is desirable and a requirement of many funding bodies. However, accessing IPD faces multiple challenges including refusals to share, delays in access to data and having to perform analyses on a remote website. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7482449/ /pubmed/32912955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038765 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Methods
Scutt, Polly
Woodhouse, Lisa J
Montgomery, Alan A
Bath, Philip M
Data sharing: experience of accessing individual patient data from completed randomised controlled trials in vascular and cognitive medicine
title Data sharing: experience of accessing individual patient data from completed randomised controlled trials in vascular and cognitive medicine
title_full Data sharing: experience of accessing individual patient data from completed randomised controlled trials in vascular and cognitive medicine
title_fullStr Data sharing: experience of accessing individual patient data from completed randomised controlled trials in vascular and cognitive medicine
title_full_unstemmed Data sharing: experience of accessing individual patient data from completed randomised controlled trials in vascular and cognitive medicine
title_short Data sharing: experience of accessing individual patient data from completed randomised controlled trials in vascular and cognitive medicine
title_sort data sharing: experience of accessing individual patient data from completed randomised controlled trials in vascular and cognitive medicine
topic Research Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7482449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32912955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038765
work_keys_str_mv AT scuttpolly datasharingexperienceofaccessingindividualpatientdatafromcompletedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsinvascularandcognitivemedicine
AT woodhouselisaj datasharingexperienceofaccessingindividualpatientdatafromcompletedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsinvascularandcognitivemedicine
AT montgomeryalana datasharingexperienceofaccessingindividualpatientdatafromcompletedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsinvascularandcognitivemedicine
AT bathphilipm datasharingexperienceofaccessingindividualpatientdatafromcompletedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsinvascularandcognitivemedicine