Cargando…

Study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy (PPOIT) in inducing desensitisation or tolerance in children with peanut allergy compared with oral immunotherapy (OIT) alone and with placebo (the PPOIT-003 study)

INTRODUCTION: Peanut allergy is the the most common cause of life-threatening food-induced anaphylaxis. There is currently no effective long-term treatment. There is a pressing need for definitive treatments that improve the quality of life and prevent fatalities. Allergen oral immunotherapy (OIT) i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chebar Lozinsky, Adriana, Loke, Paxton, Orsini, Francesca, O’Sullivan, Michael, L. Prescott, Susan, Gold, Michael S, Quinn, Patrick, DunnGalvin, Audrey, LK Tang, Mimi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7482477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32912942
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035871
_version_ 1783580794866892800
author Chebar Lozinsky, Adriana
Loke, Paxton
Orsini, Francesca
O’Sullivan, Michael
L. Prescott, Susan
Gold, Michael S
Quinn, Patrick
DunnGalvin, Audrey
LK Tang, Mimi
author_facet Chebar Lozinsky, Adriana
Loke, Paxton
Orsini, Francesca
O’Sullivan, Michael
L. Prescott, Susan
Gold, Michael S
Quinn, Patrick
DunnGalvin, Audrey
LK Tang, Mimi
author_sort Chebar Lozinsky, Adriana
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Peanut allergy is the the most common cause of life-threatening food-induced anaphylaxis. There is currently no effective long-term treatment. There is a pressing need for definitive treatments that improve the quality of life and prevent fatalities. Allergen oral immunotherapy (OIT) is a promising approach, which is effective at inducing desensitisation; however, OIT has a limited ability to induce sustained unresponsiveness (SU). We have previously shown that a novel treatment comprising a combination of the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus CGMCC 1.3724 with peanut OIT (Probiotic Peanut Oral ImmunoTherapy (PPOIT)) is highly effective at inducing SU, with benefit persisting to 4 years after treatment cessation in the majority of initial treatment responders. Here we describe the protocol for a Phase IIb multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial (PPOIT-003) with dual primary objectives to evaluate the effectiveness of PPOIT at inducing SU (assessed at 8 weeks after treatment cessation) compared with placebo treatment and peanut OIT alone, in children with peanut allergy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 200 children 1 to 10 years of age with current peanut allergy confirmed by failed double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) at study screening will be recruited from three tertiary paediatric hospitals in Australia. There are three intervention arms—PPOIT, peanut OIT alone or placebo. Interventions are administered once daily for 18 months. The dual primary outcomes are: (1) the proportion of children who attain 8-week SU in the PPOIT group versus placebo group and (2) the proportion of children who attain 8-week SU in the PPOIT group versus OIT group. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committees at the Royal Children’s Hospital (HREC 35246) and the Child and Adolescent Health Service (RGS 2543). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated via presentations at international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12616000322437.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7482477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74824772020-09-18 Study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy (PPOIT) in inducing desensitisation or tolerance in children with peanut allergy compared with oral immunotherapy (OIT) alone and with placebo (the PPOIT-003 study) Chebar Lozinsky, Adriana Loke, Paxton Orsini, Francesca O’Sullivan, Michael L. Prescott, Susan Gold, Michael S Quinn, Patrick DunnGalvin, Audrey LK Tang, Mimi BMJ Open Immunology (Including Allergy) INTRODUCTION: Peanut allergy is the the most common cause of life-threatening food-induced anaphylaxis. There is currently no effective long-term treatment. There is a pressing need for definitive treatments that improve the quality of life and prevent fatalities. Allergen oral immunotherapy (OIT) is a promising approach, which is effective at inducing desensitisation; however, OIT has a limited ability to induce sustained unresponsiveness (SU). We have previously shown that a novel treatment comprising a combination of the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus CGMCC 1.3724 with peanut OIT (Probiotic Peanut Oral ImmunoTherapy (PPOIT)) is highly effective at inducing SU, with benefit persisting to 4 years after treatment cessation in the majority of initial treatment responders. Here we describe the protocol for a Phase IIb multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial (PPOIT-003) with dual primary objectives to evaluate the effectiveness of PPOIT at inducing SU (assessed at 8 weeks after treatment cessation) compared with placebo treatment and peanut OIT alone, in children with peanut allergy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 200 children 1 to 10 years of age with current peanut allergy confirmed by failed double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) at study screening will be recruited from three tertiary paediatric hospitals in Australia. There are three intervention arms—PPOIT, peanut OIT alone or placebo. Interventions are administered once daily for 18 months. The dual primary outcomes are: (1) the proportion of children who attain 8-week SU in the PPOIT group versus placebo group and (2) the proportion of children who attain 8-week SU in the PPOIT group versus OIT group. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committees at the Royal Children’s Hospital (HREC 35246) and the Child and Adolescent Health Service (RGS 2543). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated via presentations at international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12616000322437. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7482477/ /pubmed/32912942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035871 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Immunology (Including Allergy)
Chebar Lozinsky, Adriana
Loke, Paxton
Orsini, Francesca
O’Sullivan, Michael
L. Prescott, Susan
Gold, Michael S
Quinn, Patrick
DunnGalvin, Audrey
LK Tang, Mimi
Study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy (PPOIT) in inducing desensitisation or tolerance in children with peanut allergy compared with oral immunotherapy (OIT) alone and with placebo (the PPOIT-003 study)
title Study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy (PPOIT) in inducing desensitisation or tolerance in children with peanut allergy compared with oral immunotherapy (OIT) alone and with placebo (the PPOIT-003 study)
title_full Study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy (PPOIT) in inducing desensitisation or tolerance in children with peanut allergy compared with oral immunotherapy (OIT) alone and with placebo (the PPOIT-003 study)
title_fullStr Study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy (PPOIT) in inducing desensitisation or tolerance in children with peanut allergy compared with oral immunotherapy (OIT) alone and with placebo (the PPOIT-003 study)
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy (PPOIT) in inducing desensitisation or tolerance in children with peanut allergy compared with oral immunotherapy (OIT) alone and with placebo (the PPOIT-003 study)
title_short Study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy (PPOIT) in inducing desensitisation or tolerance in children with peanut allergy compared with oral immunotherapy (OIT) alone and with placebo (the PPOIT-003 study)
title_sort study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy (ppoit) in inducing desensitisation or tolerance in children with peanut allergy compared with oral immunotherapy (oit) alone and with placebo (the ppoit-003 study)
topic Immunology (Including Allergy)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7482477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32912942
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035871
work_keys_str_mv AT chebarlozinskyadriana studyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectivenessofprobioticandpeanutoralimmunotherapyppoitininducingdesensitisationortoleranceinchildrenwithpeanutallergycomparedwithoralimmunotherapyoitaloneandwithplacebotheppoit003study
AT lokepaxton studyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectivenessofprobioticandpeanutoralimmunotherapyppoitininducingdesensitisationortoleranceinchildrenwithpeanutallergycomparedwithoralimmunotherapyoitaloneandwithplacebotheppoit003study
AT orsinifrancesca studyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectivenessofprobioticandpeanutoralimmunotherapyppoitininducingdesensitisationortoleranceinchildrenwithpeanutallergycomparedwithoralimmunotherapyoitaloneandwithplacebotheppoit003study
AT osullivanmichael studyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectivenessofprobioticandpeanutoralimmunotherapyppoitininducingdesensitisationortoleranceinchildrenwithpeanutallergycomparedwithoralimmunotherapyoitaloneandwithplacebotheppoit003study
AT lprescottsusan studyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectivenessofprobioticandpeanutoralimmunotherapyppoitininducingdesensitisationortoleranceinchildrenwithpeanutallergycomparedwithoralimmunotherapyoitaloneandwithplacebotheppoit003study
AT goldmichaels studyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectivenessofprobioticandpeanutoralimmunotherapyppoitininducingdesensitisationortoleranceinchildrenwithpeanutallergycomparedwithoralimmunotherapyoitaloneandwithplacebotheppoit003study
AT quinnpatrick studyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectivenessofprobioticandpeanutoralimmunotherapyppoitininducingdesensitisationortoleranceinchildrenwithpeanutallergycomparedwithoralimmunotherapyoitaloneandwithplacebotheppoit003study
AT dunngalvinaudrey studyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectivenessofprobioticandpeanutoralimmunotherapyppoitininducingdesensitisationortoleranceinchildrenwithpeanutallergycomparedwithoralimmunotherapyoitaloneandwithplacebotheppoit003study
AT lktangmimi studyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectivenessofprobioticandpeanutoralimmunotherapyppoitininducingdesensitisationortoleranceinchildrenwithpeanutallergycomparedwithoralimmunotherapyoitaloneandwithplacebotheppoit003study
AT studyprotocolofamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheeffectivenessofprobioticandpeanutoralimmunotherapyppoitininducingdesensitisationortoleranceinchildrenwithpeanutallergycomparedwithoralimmunotherapyoitaloneandwithplacebotheppoit003study