Cargando…

Risk factors for disruptive behaviours: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of quasi-experimental evidence

INTRODUCTION: Disruptive behaviour disorders, including oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder, are a common set of diagnoses in childhood and adolescence, with global estimates of 5.7%, 3.6% and 2.1% for any disruptive disorder, oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder, respec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karwatowska, Lucy, Russell, Simon, Solmi, Francesca, De Stavola, Bianca Lucia, Jaffee, Sara, Pingault, Jean-Baptiste, Viding, Essi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7482491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32907905
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038258
_version_ 1783580797067853824
author Karwatowska, Lucy
Russell, Simon
Solmi, Francesca
De Stavola, Bianca Lucia
Jaffee, Sara
Pingault, Jean-Baptiste
Viding, Essi
author_facet Karwatowska, Lucy
Russell, Simon
Solmi, Francesca
De Stavola, Bianca Lucia
Jaffee, Sara
Pingault, Jean-Baptiste
Viding, Essi
author_sort Karwatowska, Lucy
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Disruptive behaviour disorders, including oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder, are a common set of diagnoses in childhood and adolescence, with global estimates of 5.7%, 3.6% and 2.1% for any disruptive disorder, oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder, respectively. There are high economic and social costs associated with disruptive behaviours and the prevalence of these disorders has increased in recent years. As such, disruptive behaviours represent an escalating major public health concern and it is important to understand what factors may influence the risk of these behaviours. Such research would inform interventions that aim to prevent the development of disruptive behaviours. The current review will identify the most stringent evidence of putative risk factors for disruptive behaviour from quasi-experimental studies, which enable stronger causal inference. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The review will be carried out according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. An electronic search of references published between 1 January 1980 and 1 March 2020 will be conducted using Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science. Initial abstract and title screening, full-text screening and data extraction will be completed independently by two reviewers using Evidence for Policy and Practice Information (EPPI)-Reviewer 4 software. Quasi-experimental studies in the English language examining the association between any putative risk factor and a clearly defined measure of disruptive behaviour (eg, a validated questionnaire measure) will be included. We will conduct meta-analyses if we can pool a minimum of three similar studies with the same or similar exposures and outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The proposed review does not require ethical approval. The results will help to identify risk factors for which there is strong evidence of causal effects on disruptive behaviours and also highlight potential risk factors that require further research. The findings will be disseminated via publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and through presentations at international meetings and conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020169313.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7482491
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74824912020-09-18 Risk factors for disruptive behaviours: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of quasi-experimental evidence Karwatowska, Lucy Russell, Simon Solmi, Francesca De Stavola, Bianca Lucia Jaffee, Sara Pingault, Jean-Baptiste Viding, Essi BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: Disruptive behaviour disorders, including oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder, are a common set of diagnoses in childhood and adolescence, with global estimates of 5.7%, 3.6% and 2.1% for any disruptive disorder, oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder, respectively. There are high economic and social costs associated with disruptive behaviours and the prevalence of these disorders has increased in recent years. As such, disruptive behaviours represent an escalating major public health concern and it is important to understand what factors may influence the risk of these behaviours. Such research would inform interventions that aim to prevent the development of disruptive behaviours. The current review will identify the most stringent evidence of putative risk factors for disruptive behaviour from quasi-experimental studies, which enable stronger causal inference. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The review will be carried out according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. An electronic search of references published between 1 January 1980 and 1 March 2020 will be conducted using Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science. Initial abstract and title screening, full-text screening and data extraction will be completed independently by two reviewers using Evidence for Policy and Practice Information (EPPI)-Reviewer 4 software. Quasi-experimental studies in the English language examining the association between any putative risk factor and a clearly defined measure of disruptive behaviour (eg, a validated questionnaire measure) will be included. We will conduct meta-analyses if we can pool a minimum of three similar studies with the same or similar exposures and outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The proposed review does not require ethical approval. The results will help to identify risk factors for which there is strong evidence of causal effects on disruptive behaviours and also highlight potential risk factors that require further research. The findings will be disseminated via publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and through presentations at international meetings and conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020169313. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7482491/ /pubmed/32907905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038258 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Mental Health
Karwatowska, Lucy
Russell, Simon
Solmi, Francesca
De Stavola, Bianca Lucia
Jaffee, Sara
Pingault, Jean-Baptiste
Viding, Essi
Risk factors for disruptive behaviours: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of quasi-experimental evidence
title Risk factors for disruptive behaviours: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of quasi-experimental evidence
title_full Risk factors for disruptive behaviours: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of quasi-experimental evidence
title_fullStr Risk factors for disruptive behaviours: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of quasi-experimental evidence
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors for disruptive behaviours: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of quasi-experimental evidence
title_short Risk factors for disruptive behaviours: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of quasi-experimental evidence
title_sort risk factors for disruptive behaviours: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of quasi-experimental evidence
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7482491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32907905
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038258
work_keys_str_mv AT karwatowskalucy riskfactorsfordisruptivebehavioursprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofquasiexperimentalevidence
AT russellsimon riskfactorsfordisruptivebehavioursprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofquasiexperimentalevidence
AT solmifrancesca riskfactorsfordisruptivebehavioursprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofquasiexperimentalevidence
AT destavolabiancalucia riskfactorsfordisruptivebehavioursprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofquasiexperimentalevidence
AT jaffeesara riskfactorsfordisruptivebehavioursprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofquasiexperimentalevidence
AT pingaultjeanbaptiste riskfactorsfordisruptivebehavioursprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofquasiexperimentalevidence
AT vidingessi riskfactorsfordisruptivebehavioursprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofquasiexperimentalevidence