Cargando…
Risk factors for disruptive behaviours: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of quasi-experimental evidence
INTRODUCTION: Disruptive behaviour disorders, including oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder, are a common set of diagnoses in childhood and adolescence, with global estimates of 5.7%, 3.6% and 2.1% for any disruptive disorder, oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder, respec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7482491/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32907905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038258 |
_version_ | 1783580797067853824 |
---|---|
author | Karwatowska, Lucy Russell, Simon Solmi, Francesca De Stavola, Bianca Lucia Jaffee, Sara Pingault, Jean-Baptiste Viding, Essi |
author_facet | Karwatowska, Lucy Russell, Simon Solmi, Francesca De Stavola, Bianca Lucia Jaffee, Sara Pingault, Jean-Baptiste Viding, Essi |
author_sort | Karwatowska, Lucy |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Disruptive behaviour disorders, including oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder, are a common set of diagnoses in childhood and adolescence, with global estimates of 5.7%, 3.6% and 2.1% for any disruptive disorder, oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder, respectively. There are high economic and social costs associated with disruptive behaviours and the prevalence of these disorders has increased in recent years. As such, disruptive behaviours represent an escalating major public health concern and it is important to understand what factors may influence the risk of these behaviours. Such research would inform interventions that aim to prevent the development of disruptive behaviours. The current review will identify the most stringent evidence of putative risk factors for disruptive behaviour from quasi-experimental studies, which enable stronger causal inference. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The review will be carried out according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. An electronic search of references published between 1 January 1980 and 1 March 2020 will be conducted using Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science. Initial abstract and title screening, full-text screening and data extraction will be completed independently by two reviewers using Evidence for Policy and Practice Information (EPPI)-Reviewer 4 software. Quasi-experimental studies in the English language examining the association between any putative risk factor and a clearly defined measure of disruptive behaviour (eg, a validated questionnaire measure) will be included. We will conduct meta-analyses if we can pool a minimum of three similar studies with the same or similar exposures and outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The proposed review does not require ethical approval. The results will help to identify risk factors for which there is strong evidence of causal effects on disruptive behaviours and also highlight potential risk factors that require further research. The findings will be disseminated via publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and through presentations at international meetings and conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020169313. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7482491 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74824912020-09-18 Risk factors for disruptive behaviours: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of quasi-experimental evidence Karwatowska, Lucy Russell, Simon Solmi, Francesca De Stavola, Bianca Lucia Jaffee, Sara Pingault, Jean-Baptiste Viding, Essi BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: Disruptive behaviour disorders, including oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder, are a common set of diagnoses in childhood and adolescence, with global estimates of 5.7%, 3.6% and 2.1% for any disruptive disorder, oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder, respectively. There are high economic and social costs associated with disruptive behaviours and the prevalence of these disorders has increased in recent years. As such, disruptive behaviours represent an escalating major public health concern and it is important to understand what factors may influence the risk of these behaviours. Such research would inform interventions that aim to prevent the development of disruptive behaviours. The current review will identify the most stringent evidence of putative risk factors for disruptive behaviour from quasi-experimental studies, which enable stronger causal inference. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The review will be carried out according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. An electronic search of references published between 1 January 1980 and 1 March 2020 will be conducted using Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science. Initial abstract and title screening, full-text screening and data extraction will be completed independently by two reviewers using Evidence for Policy and Practice Information (EPPI)-Reviewer 4 software. Quasi-experimental studies in the English language examining the association between any putative risk factor and a clearly defined measure of disruptive behaviour (eg, a validated questionnaire measure) will be included. We will conduct meta-analyses if we can pool a minimum of three similar studies with the same or similar exposures and outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The proposed review does not require ethical approval. The results will help to identify risk factors for which there is strong evidence of causal effects on disruptive behaviours and also highlight potential risk factors that require further research. The findings will be disseminated via publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and through presentations at international meetings and conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020169313. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7482491/ /pubmed/32907905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038258 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Mental Health Karwatowska, Lucy Russell, Simon Solmi, Francesca De Stavola, Bianca Lucia Jaffee, Sara Pingault, Jean-Baptiste Viding, Essi Risk factors for disruptive behaviours: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of quasi-experimental evidence |
title | Risk factors for disruptive behaviours: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of quasi-experimental evidence |
title_full | Risk factors for disruptive behaviours: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of quasi-experimental evidence |
title_fullStr | Risk factors for disruptive behaviours: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of quasi-experimental evidence |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk factors for disruptive behaviours: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of quasi-experimental evidence |
title_short | Risk factors for disruptive behaviours: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of quasi-experimental evidence |
title_sort | risk factors for disruptive behaviours: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of quasi-experimental evidence |
topic | Mental Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7482491/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32907905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038258 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karwatowskalucy riskfactorsfordisruptivebehavioursprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofquasiexperimentalevidence AT russellsimon riskfactorsfordisruptivebehavioursprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofquasiexperimentalevidence AT solmifrancesca riskfactorsfordisruptivebehavioursprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofquasiexperimentalevidence AT destavolabiancalucia riskfactorsfordisruptivebehavioursprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofquasiexperimentalevidence AT jaffeesara riskfactorsfordisruptivebehavioursprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofquasiexperimentalevidence AT pingaultjeanbaptiste riskfactorsfordisruptivebehavioursprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofquasiexperimentalevidence AT vidingessi riskfactorsfordisruptivebehavioursprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofquasiexperimentalevidence |