Cargando…
Comparison between Wrapping Dice Cartilage with Temporal Fascia and Wrapping in Alloderm for Dorsal Nasal Augmentation
BACKGROUND: Dorsal augmentation of the nose for aesthetic and reconstructive purposes is an important issue in rhinoplasty surgery. This study aimed to compare the two methods of dice cartilage wrapping for dorsal augmentation of the nose including temporalis fascia and alloderm. METHODS: In a clini...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Iranian Society for Plastic Surgeons
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7482540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32934927 http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/wjps.9.2.160 |
_version_ | 1783580807801077760 |
---|---|
author | Heidari, Mohammad Bagher Rasti, Mehdi Nadri, Sedigheh Roozbehani, Arian Farhang Fallah, Afshin Mahmoudvand, Hormoz |
author_facet | Heidari, Mohammad Bagher Rasti, Mehdi Nadri, Sedigheh Roozbehani, Arian Farhang Fallah, Afshin Mahmoudvand, Hormoz |
author_sort | Heidari, Mohammad Bagher |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Dorsal augmentation of the nose for aesthetic and reconstructive purposes is an important issue in rhinoplasty surgery. This study aimed to compare the two methods of dice cartilage wrapping for dorsal augmentation of the nose including temporalis fascia and alloderm. METHODS: In a clinical trial study, 50 patients who needed to augment the nasal dorsum, were enrolled and randomly allocated to two equal groups. In the first group, diced cartilage graft of the patient was wrapped in temporalis fascia and in the second group, a thin sheet of alloderm was used for this purpose. After one year follow up, satisfaction of patients and the expert panel were compared in two groups. Also mean increase in dorsal height was measured and compared in two groups. RESULTS: The mean increase of dorsal nasal height one year after surgery in the alloderm and temporalis fascia was 3.13±0.49 and 3.42±0.33, respectively and in the fascia group was significantly higher (p=0.02). The mean of patients’ satisfaction in the two groups of alloderm and temporal fascia groups was 7.48±0.92 and 8.04±0.89, respectively (p=0.03). The mean satisfaction of expert panel in the two methods was 7.56±0.81 and 7.7±0.63, respectively (p=0.5). CONCLUSION: The use of temporal fascia for covering the diced cartilage in augmentation of nasal dorsum had better results than the alloderm. Patients satisfaction and mean dorsal height was higher in temporal fascia group. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7482540 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Iranian Society for Plastic Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74825402020-09-14 Comparison between Wrapping Dice Cartilage with Temporal Fascia and Wrapping in Alloderm for Dorsal Nasal Augmentation Heidari, Mohammad Bagher Rasti, Mehdi Nadri, Sedigheh Roozbehani, Arian Farhang Fallah, Afshin Mahmoudvand, Hormoz World J Plast Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Dorsal augmentation of the nose for aesthetic and reconstructive purposes is an important issue in rhinoplasty surgery. This study aimed to compare the two methods of dice cartilage wrapping for dorsal augmentation of the nose including temporalis fascia and alloderm. METHODS: In a clinical trial study, 50 patients who needed to augment the nasal dorsum, were enrolled and randomly allocated to two equal groups. In the first group, diced cartilage graft of the patient was wrapped in temporalis fascia and in the second group, a thin sheet of alloderm was used for this purpose. After one year follow up, satisfaction of patients and the expert panel were compared in two groups. Also mean increase in dorsal height was measured and compared in two groups. RESULTS: The mean increase of dorsal nasal height one year after surgery in the alloderm and temporalis fascia was 3.13±0.49 and 3.42±0.33, respectively and in the fascia group was significantly higher (p=0.02). The mean of patients’ satisfaction in the two groups of alloderm and temporal fascia groups was 7.48±0.92 and 8.04±0.89, respectively (p=0.03). The mean satisfaction of expert panel in the two methods was 7.56±0.81 and 7.7±0.63, respectively (p=0.5). CONCLUSION: The use of temporal fascia for covering the diced cartilage in augmentation of nasal dorsum had better results than the alloderm. Patients satisfaction and mean dorsal height was higher in temporal fascia group. Iranian Society for Plastic Surgeons 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7482540/ /pubmed/32934927 http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/wjps.9.2.160 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Heidari, Mohammad Bagher Rasti, Mehdi Nadri, Sedigheh Roozbehani, Arian Farhang Fallah, Afshin Mahmoudvand, Hormoz Comparison between Wrapping Dice Cartilage with Temporal Fascia and Wrapping in Alloderm for Dorsal Nasal Augmentation |
title | Comparison between Wrapping Dice Cartilage with Temporal Fascia and Wrapping in Alloderm for Dorsal Nasal Augmentation |
title_full | Comparison between Wrapping Dice Cartilage with Temporal Fascia and Wrapping in Alloderm for Dorsal Nasal Augmentation |
title_fullStr | Comparison between Wrapping Dice Cartilage with Temporal Fascia and Wrapping in Alloderm for Dorsal Nasal Augmentation |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between Wrapping Dice Cartilage with Temporal Fascia and Wrapping in Alloderm for Dorsal Nasal Augmentation |
title_short | Comparison between Wrapping Dice Cartilage with Temporal Fascia and Wrapping in Alloderm for Dorsal Nasal Augmentation |
title_sort | comparison between wrapping dice cartilage with temporal fascia and wrapping in alloderm for dorsal nasal augmentation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7482540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32934927 http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/wjps.9.2.160 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heidarimohammadbagher comparisonbetweenwrappingdicecartilagewithtemporalfasciaandwrappinginallodermfordorsalnasalaugmentation AT rastimehdi comparisonbetweenwrappingdicecartilagewithtemporalfasciaandwrappinginallodermfordorsalnasalaugmentation AT nadrisedigheh comparisonbetweenwrappingdicecartilagewithtemporalfasciaandwrappinginallodermfordorsalnasalaugmentation AT roozbehaniarian comparisonbetweenwrappingdicecartilagewithtemporalfasciaandwrappinginallodermfordorsalnasalaugmentation AT farhangfallahafshin comparisonbetweenwrappingdicecartilagewithtemporalfasciaandwrappinginallodermfordorsalnasalaugmentation AT mahmoudvandhormoz comparisonbetweenwrappingdicecartilagewithtemporalfasciaandwrappinginallodermfordorsalnasalaugmentation |