Cargando…

Comparison between Wrapping Dice Cartilage with Temporal Fascia and Wrapping in Alloderm for Dorsal Nasal Augmentation

BACKGROUND: Dorsal augmentation of the nose for aesthetic and reconstructive purposes is an important issue in rhinoplasty surgery. This study aimed to compare the two methods of dice cartilage wrapping for dorsal augmentation of the nose including temporalis fascia and alloderm. METHODS: In a clini...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heidari, Mohammad Bagher, Rasti, Mehdi, Nadri, Sedigheh, Roozbehani, Arian, Farhang Fallah, Afshin, Mahmoudvand, Hormoz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iranian Society for Plastic Surgeons 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7482540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32934927
http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/wjps.9.2.160
_version_ 1783580807801077760
author Heidari, Mohammad Bagher
Rasti, Mehdi
Nadri, Sedigheh
Roozbehani, Arian
Farhang Fallah, Afshin
Mahmoudvand, Hormoz
author_facet Heidari, Mohammad Bagher
Rasti, Mehdi
Nadri, Sedigheh
Roozbehani, Arian
Farhang Fallah, Afshin
Mahmoudvand, Hormoz
author_sort Heidari, Mohammad Bagher
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dorsal augmentation of the nose for aesthetic and reconstructive purposes is an important issue in rhinoplasty surgery. This study aimed to compare the two methods of dice cartilage wrapping for dorsal augmentation of the nose including temporalis fascia and alloderm. METHODS: In a clinical trial study, 50 patients who needed to augment the nasal dorsum, were enrolled and randomly allocated to two equal groups. In the first group, diced cartilage graft of the patient was wrapped in temporalis fascia and in the second group, a thin sheet of alloderm was used for this purpose. After one year follow up, satisfaction of patients and the expert panel were compared in two groups. Also mean increase in dorsal height was measured and compared in two groups. RESULTS: The mean increase of dorsal nasal height one year after surgery in the alloderm and temporalis fascia was 3.13±0.49 and 3.42±0.33, respectively and in the fascia group was significantly higher (p=0.02). The mean of patients’ satisfaction in the two groups of alloderm and temporal fascia groups was 7.48±0.92 and 8.04±0.89, respectively (p=0.03). The mean satisfaction of expert panel in the two methods was 7.56±0.81 and 7.7±0.63, respectively (p=0.5). CONCLUSION: The use of temporal fascia for covering the diced cartilage in augmentation of nasal dorsum had better results than the alloderm. Patients satisfaction and mean dorsal height was higher in temporal fascia group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7482540
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Iranian Society for Plastic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74825402020-09-14 Comparison between Wrapping Dice Cartilage with Temporal Fascia and Wrapping in Alloderm for Dorsal Nasal Augmentation Heidari, Mohammad Bagher Rasti, Mehdi Nadri, Sedigheh Roozbehani, Arian Farhang Fallah, Afshin Mahmoudvand, Hormoz World J Plast Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Dorsal augmentation of the nose for aesthetic and reconstructive purposes is an important issue in rhinoplasty surgery. This study aimed to compare the two methods of dice cartilage wrapping for dorsal augmentation of the nose including temporalis fascia and alloderm. METHODS: In a clinical trial study, 50 patients who needed to augment the nasal dorsum, were enrolled and randomly allocated to two equal groups. In the first group, diced cartilage graft of the patient was wrapped in temporalis fascia and in the second group, a thin sheet of alloderm was used for this purpose. After one year follow up, satisfaction of patients and the expert panel were compared in two groups. Also mean increase in dorsal height was measured and compared in two groups. RESULTS: The mean increase of dorsal nasal height one year after surgery in the alloderm and temporalis fascia was 3.13±0.49 and 3.42±0.33, respectively and in the fascia group was significantly higher (p=0.02). The mean of patients’ satisfaction in the two groups of alloderm and temporal fascia groups was 7.48±0.92 and 8.04±0.89, respectively (p=0.03). The mean satisfaction of expert panel in the two methods was 7.56±0.81 and 7.7±0.63, respectively (p=0.5). CONCLUSION: The use of temporal fascia for covering the diced cartilage in augmentation of nasal dorsum had better results than the alloderm. Patients satisfaction and mean dorsal height was higher in temporal fascia group. Iranian Society for Plastic Surgeons 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7482540/ /pubmed/32934927 http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/wjps.9.2.160 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Heidari, Mohammad Bagher
Rasti, Mehdi
Nadri, Sedigheh
Roozbehani, Arian
Farhang Fallah, Afshin
Mahmoudvand, Hormoz
Comparison between Wrapping Dice Cartilage with Temporal Fascia and Wrapping in Alloderm for Dorsal Nasal Augmentation
title Comparison between Wrapping Dice Cartilage with Temporal Fascia and Wrapping in Alloderm for Dorsal Nasal Augmentation
title_full Comparison between Wrapping Dice Cartilage with Temporal Fascia and Wrapping in Alloderm for Dorsal Nasal Augmentation
title_fullStr Comparison between Wrapping Dice Cartilage with Temporal Fascia and Wrapping in Alloderm for Dorsal Nasal Augmentation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Wrapping Dice Cartilage with Temporal Fascia and Wrapping in Alloderm for Dorsal Nasal Augmentation
title_short Comparison between Wrapping Dice Cartilage with Temporal Fascia and Wrapping in Alloderm for Dorsal Nasal Augmentation
title_sort comparison between wrapping dice cartilage with temporal fascia and wrapping in alloderm for dorsal nasal augmentation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7482540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32934927
http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/wjps.9.2.160
work_keys_str_mv AT heidarimohammadbagher comparisonbetweenwrappingdicecartilagewithtemporalfasciaandwrappinginallodermfordorsalnasalaugmentation
AT rastimehdi comparisonbetweenwrappingdicecartilagewithtemporalfasciaandwrappinginallodermfordorsalnasalaugmentation
AT nadrisedigheh comparisonbetweenwrappingdicecartilagewithtemporalfasciaandwrappinginallodermfordorsalnasalaugmentation
AT roozbehaniarian comparisonbetweenwrappingdicecartilagewithtemporalfasciaandwrappinginallodermfordorsalnasalaugmentation
AT farhangfallahafshin comparisonbetweenwrappingdicecartilagewithtemporalfasciaandwrappinginallodermfordorsalnasalaugmentation
AT mahmoudvandhormoz comparisonbetweenwrappingdicecartilagewithtemporalfasciaandwrappinginallodermfordorsalnasalaugmentation