Cargando…
Organizational aspect in healthcare decision-making: a literature review
BACKGROUND: Organizational aspect is rarely considered in healthcare. However, it is gradually seen as one of the key aspects of the decision-making process as well as clinical and economic dimensions. Our primary objective was to identify criteria already used to assess the organizational impact of...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Routledge
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7482895/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32944200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2020.1810905 |
_version_ | 1783580865537769472 |
---|---|
author | Dubromel, Amélie Duvinage-Vonesch, Marie-Audrey Geffroy, Loïc Dussart, Claude |
author_facet | Dubromel, Amélie Duvinage-Vonesch, Marie-Audrey Geffroy, Loïc Dussart, Claude |
author_sort | Dubromel, Amélie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Organizational aspect is rarely considered in healthcare. However, it is gradually seen as one of the key aspects of the decision-making process as well as clinical and economic dimensions. Our primary objective was to identify criteria already used to assess the organizational impact of medical innovations. Our secondary objective was to structure them into an inventory to support decision-makers to select the relevant criteria for their complex decision-making issues. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search using the Medline database was conducted in June 2019. The records published between January, 1990 and December, 2018 were identified. The publications cited by the authors of the included articles and the websites of health technology assessment agencies, units or learned societies identified during the search were also consulted. The identified criteria were structured in an inventory. RESULTS: We selected 107 records of a wide range of evidence mostly published after the 2000s. We identified 636 criteria that we classified into five categories: people, task, structure, technology, and surroundings. CONCLUSION: Criteria selection is a crucial step in any multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). This work is the first step in the development of a validated MCDA method to assess the organizational impact of medical innovations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7482895 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Routledge |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74828952020-09-16 Organizational aspect in healthcare decision-making: a literature review Dubromel, Amélie Duvinage-Vonesch, Marie-Audrey Geffroy, Loïc Dussart, Claude J Mark Access Health Policy Review Article BACKGROUND: Organizational aspect is rarely considered in healthcare. However, it is gradually seen as one of the key aspects of the decision-making process as well as clinical and economic dimensions. Our primary objective was to identify criteria already used to assess the organizational impact of medical innovations. Our secondary objective was to structure them into an inventory to support decision-makers to select the relevant criteria for their complex decision-making issues. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search using the Medline database was conducted in June 2019. The records published between January, 1990 and December, 2018 were identified. The publications cited by the authors of the included articles and the websites of health technology assessment agencies, units or learned societies identified during the search were also consulted. The identified criteria were structured in an inventory. RESULTS: We selected 107 records of a wide range of evidence mostly published after the 2000s. We identified 636 criteria that we classified into five categories: people, task, structure, technology, and surroundings. CONCLUSION: Criteria selection is a crucial step in any multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). This work is the first step in the development of a validated MCDA method to assess the organizational impact of medical innovations. Routledge 2020-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7482895/ /pubmed/32944200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2020.1810905 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Dubromel, Amélie Duvinage-Vonesch, Marie-Audrey Geffroy, Loïc Dussart, Claude Organizational aspect in healthcare decision-making: a literature review |
title | Organizational aspect in healthcare decision-making: a literature review |
title_full | Organizational aspect in healthcare decision-making: a literature review |
title_fullStr | Organizational aspect in healthcare decision-making: a literature review |
title_full_unstemmed | Organizational aspect in healthcare decision-making: a literature review |
title_short | Organizational aspect in healthcare decision-making: a literature review |
title_sort | organizational aspect in healthcare decision-making: a literature review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7482895/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32944200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2020.1810905 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dubromelamelie organizationalaspectinhealthcaredecisionmakingaliteraturereview AT duvinagevoneschmarieaudrey organizationalaspectinhealthcaredecisionmakingaliteraturereview AT geffroyloic organizationalaspectinhealthcaredecisionmakingaliteraturereview AT dussartclaude organizationalaspectinhealthcaredecisionmakingaliteraturereview |