Cargando…

Accuracy assessment of a novel semiautomatic method evaluating bone grafts around the dental implant: an in vitro and ex vivo study

The present study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and repeatability of morphological contour interpolation (MCI)-based semiautomatic segmentation method for volumetric measurements of bone grafts around dental implants. Three in vitro (one with a cylinder and two with a geometrically complex form) an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Jun-Yu, Li, Yuan, Zhuang, Long-Fei, Zhang, Xiao, Fan, Ling-Feng, Lai, Hong-Chang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7483504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32913190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71651-1
_version_ 1783580930795896832
author Shi, Jun-Yu
Li, Yuan
Zhuang, Long-Fei
Zhang, Xiao
Fan, Ling-Feng
Lai, Hong-Chang
author_facet Shi, Jun-Yu
Li, Yuan
Zhuang, Long-Fei
Zhang, Xiao
Fan, Ling-Feng
Lai, Hong-Chang
author_sort Shi, Jun-Yu
collection PubMed
description The present study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and repeatability of morphological contour interpolation (MCI)-based semiautomatic segmentation method for volumetric measurements of bone grafts around dental implants. Three in vitro (one with a cylinder and two with a geometrically complex form) and four ex vivo models (peri-implant cylinder-shaped bone defect) were created for imitating implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedure. Cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) scans of all models were obtained with the same parameters. For volumetric measurements, the actual volumes of bone grafts in models were assessed by computer-aided calculation and both manual and MCI-based methods were utilized as test methods. The accuracy of the methods was evaluated by comparing the measured value and the actual volume. The repeatability was assessed by calculating the coefficients of variation of repeated measurements. For the accuracy of three dimensional (3D) reconstructions, the computer-designed corresponding models were set as the reference and the morphological deviation of 3D surface renderings created by two methods were evaluated by comparing with reference. Besides, measurement time was recorded and a comparison between the two methods was performed. High accuracy of the MCI-based segmentation method was found with a discrepancy between the measured value and actual value never exceeding − 7.5%. The excellent repeatability was shown with coefficients of variation never exceeding 1.2%. The MCI-based method showed less measurement time than the manual method and its 3D surface rendering showed a lower deviation from the reference.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7483504
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74835042020-09-15 Accuracy assessment of a novel semiautomatic method evaluating bone grafts around the dental implant: an in vitro and ex vivo study Shi, Jun-Yu Li, Yuan Zhuang, Long-Fei Zhang, Xiao Fan, Ling-Feng Lai, Hong-Chang Sci Rep Article The present study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and repeatability of morphological contour interpolation (MCI)-based semiautomatic segmentation method for volumetric measurements of bone grafts around dental implants. Three in vitro (one with a cylinder and two with a geometrically complex form) and four ex vivo models (peri-implant cylinder-shaped bone defect) were created for imitating implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedure. Cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) scans of all models were obtained with the same parameters. For volumetric measurements, the actual volumes of bone grafts in models were assessed by computer-aided calculation and both manual and MCI-based methods were utilized as test methods. The accuracy of the methods was evaluated by comparing the measured value and the actual volume. The repeatability was assessed by calculating the coefficients of variation of repeated measurements. For the accuracy of three dimensional (3D) reconstructions, the computer-designed corresponding models were set as the reference and the morphological deviation of 3D surface renderings created by two methods were evaluated by comparing with reference. Besides, measurement time was recorded and a comparison between the two methods was performed. High accuracy of the MCI-based segmentation method was found with a discrepancy between the measured value and actual value never exceeding − 7.5%. The excellent repeatability was shown with coefficients of variation never exceeding 1.2%. The MCI-based method showed less measurement time than the manual method and its 3D surface rendering showed a lower deviation from the reference. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7483504/ /pubmed/32913190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71651-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Shi, Jun-Yu
Li, Yuan
Zhuang, Long-Fei
Zhang, Xiao
Fan, Ling-Feng
Lai, Hong-Chang
Accuracy assessment of a novel semiautomatic method evaluating bone grafts around the dental implant: an in vitro and ex vivo study
title Accuracy assessment of a novel semiautomatic method evaluating bone grafts around the dental implant: an in vitro and ex vivo study
title_full Accuracy assessment of a novel semiautomatic method evaluating bone grafts around the dental implant: an in vitro and ex vivo study
title_fullStr Accuracy assessment of a novel semiautomatic method evaluating bone grafts around the dental implant: an in vitro and ex vivo study
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy assessment of a novel semiautomatic method evaluating bone grafts around the dental implant: an in vitro and ex vivo study
title_short Accuracy assessment of a novel semiautomatic method evaluating bone grafts around the dental implant: an in vitro and ex vivo study
title_sort accuracy assessment of a novel semiautomatic method evaluating bone grafts around the dental implant: an in vitro and ex vivo study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7483504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32913190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71651-1
work_keys_str_mv AT shijunyu accuracyassessmentofanovelsemiautomaticmethodevaluatingbonegraftsaroundthedentalimplantaninvitroandexvivostudy
AT liyuan accuracyassessmentofanovelsemiautomaticmethodevaluatingbonegraftsaroundthedentalimplantaninvitroandexvivostudy
AT zhuanglongfei accuracyassessmentofanovelsemiautomaticmethodevaluatingbonegraftsaroundthedentalimplantaninvitroandexvivostudy
AT zhangxiao accuracyassessmentofanovelsemiautomaticmethodevaluatingbonegraftsaroundthedentalimplantaninvitroandexvivostudy
AT fanlingfeng accuracyassessmentofanovelsemiautomaticmethodevaluatingbonegraftsaroundthedentalimplantaninvitroandexvivostudy
AT laihongchang accuracyassessmentofanovelsemiautomaticmethodevaluatingbonegraftsaroundthedentalimplantaninvitroandexvivostudy