Cargando…

Automated detection of cribriform growth patterns in prostate histology images

Cribriform growth patterns in prostate carcinoma are associated with poor prognosis. We aimed to introduce a deep learning method to detect such patterns automatically. To do so, convolutional neural network was trained to detect cribriform growth patterns on 128 prostate needle biopsies. Ensemble l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ambrosini, Pierre, Hollemans, Eva, Kweldam, Charlotte F., Leenders, Geert J. L. H. van, Stallinga, Sjoerd, Vos, Frans
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7483768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32913202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71942-7
_version_ 1783580962071773184
author Ambrosini, Pierre
Hollemans, Eva
Kweldam, Charlotte F.
Leenders, Geert J. L. H. van
Stallinga, Sjoerd
Vos, Frans
author_facet Ambrosini, Pierre
Hollemans, Eva
Kweldam, Charlotte F.
Leenders, Geert J. L. H. van
Stallinga, Sjoerd
Vos, Frans
author_sort Ambrosini, Pierre
collection PubMed
description Cribriform growth patterns in prostate carcinoma are associated with poor prognosis. We aimed to introduce a deep learning method to detect such patterns automatically. To do so, convolutional neural network was trained to detect cribriform growth patterns on 128 prostate needle biopsies. Ensemble learning taking into account other tumor growth patterns during training was used to cope with heterogeneous and limited tumor tissue occurrences. ROC and FROC analyses were applied to assess network performance regarding detection of biopsies harboring cribriform growth pattern. The ROC analysis yielded a mean area under the curve up to 0.81. FROC analysis demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.9 for regions larger than [Formula: see text] with on average 7.5 false positives. To benchmark method performance for intra-observer annotation variability, false positive and negative detections were re-evaluated by the pathologists. Pathologists considered 9% of the false positive regions as cribriform, and 11% as possibly cribriform; 44% of the false negative regions were not annotated as cribriform. As a final experiment, the network was also applied on a dataset of 60 biopsy regions annotated by 23 pathologists. With the cut-off reaching highest sensitivity, all images annotated as cribriform by at least 7/23 of the pathologists, were all detected as cribriform by the network and 9/60 of the images were detected as cribriform whereas no pathologist labelled them as such. In conclusion, the proposed deep learning method has high sensitivity for detecting cribriform growth patterns at the expense of a limited number of false positives. It can detect cribriform regions that are labelled as such by at least a minority of pathologists. Therefore, it could assist clinical decision making by suggesting suspicious regions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7483768
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74837682020-09-15 Automated detection of cribriform growth patterns in prostate histology images Ambrosini, Pierre Hollemans, Eva Kweldam, Charlotte F. Leenders, Geert J. L. H. van Stallinga, Sjoerd Vos, Frans Sci Rep Article Cribriform growth patterns in prostate carcinoma are associated with poor prognosis. We aimed to introduce a deep learning method to detect such patterns automatically. To do so, convolutional neural network was trained to detect cribriform growth patterns on 128 prostate needle biopsies. Ensemble learning taking into account other tumor growth patterns during training was used to cope with heterogeneous and limited tumor tissue occurrences. ROC and FROC analyses were applied to assess network performance regarding detection of biopsies harboring cribriform growth pattern. The ROC analysis yielded a mean area under the curve up to 0.81. FROC analysis demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.9 for regions larger than [Formula: see text] with on average 7.5 false positives. To benchmark method performance for intra-observer annotation variability, false positive and negative detections were re-evaluated by the pathologists. Pathologists considered 9% of the false positive regions as cribriform, and 11% as possibly cribriform; 44% of the false negative regions were not annotated as cribriform. As a final experiment, the network was also applied on a dataset of 60 biopsy regions annotated by 23 pathologists. With the cut-off reaching highest sensitivity, all images annotated as cribriform by at least 7/23 of the pathologists, were all detected as cribriform by the network and 9/60 of the images were detected as cribriform whereas no pathologist labelled them as such. In conclusion, the proposed deep learning method has high sensitivity for detecting cribriform growth patterns at the expense of a limited number of false positives. It can detect cribriform regions that are labelled as such by at least a minority of pathologists. Therefore, it could assist clinical decision making by suggesting suspicious regions. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7483768/ /pubmed/32913202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71942-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Ambrosini, Pierre
Hollemans, Eva
Kweldam, Charlotte F.
Leenders, Geert J. L. H. van
Stallinga, Sjoerd
Vos, Frans
Automated detection of cribriform growth patterns in prostate histology images
title Automated detection of cribriform growth patterns in prostate histology images
title_full Automated detection of cribriform growth patterns in prostate histology images
title_fullStr Automated detection of cribriform growth patterns in prostate histology images
title_full_unstemmed Automated detection of cribriform growth patterns in prostate histology images
title_short Automated detection of cribriform growth patterns in prostate histology images
title_sort automated detection of cribriform growth patterns in prostate histology images
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7483768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32913202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71942-7
work_keys_str_mv AT ambrosinipierre automateddetectionofcribriformgrowthpatternsinprostatehistologyimages
AT hollemanseva automateddetectionofcribriformgrowthpatternsinprostatehistologyimages
AT kweldamcharlottef automateddetectionofcribriformgrowthpatternsinprostatehistologyimages
AT leendersgeertjlhvan automateddetectionofcribriformgrowthpatternsinprostatehistologyimages
AT stallingasjoerd automateddetectionofcribriformgrowthpatternsinprostatehistologyimages
AT vosfrans automateddetectionofcribriformgrowthpatternsinprostatehistologyimages