Cargando…

QRS-T-angle in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) - a Comparison with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Background: The QRS-T angle from the surface EKG is a promising prognostic marker in patients with coronary artery disease. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) offers high resolution imaging of myocardial damage. We investigated the association of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zadeh, B., Wambach, J. M., Lambers, M., Nassenstein, K., Jensen, C.J., Bruder, O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7484652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32922190
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/ijms.44312
_version_ 1783581015403397120
author Zadeh, B.
Wambach, J. M.
Lambers, M.
Nassenstein, K.
Jensen, C.J.
Bruder, O.
author_facet Zadeh, B.
Wambach, J. M.
Lambers, M.
Nassenstein, K.
Jensen, C.J.
Bruder, O.
author_sort Zadeh, B.
collection PubMed
description Background: The QRS-T angle from the surface EKG is a promising prognostic marker in patients with coronary artery disease. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) offers high resolution imaging of myocardial damage. We investigated the association of the QRS-T angle and the extent of myocardial damage as assessed by LGE in patients with acute ST-segment myocardial infarction (STEMI) Methods: 169 patients with STEMI obtained a standardized digital 12-lead EKG on admission for the calculation of the QRS-T angle and underwent CMR imaging for analysis of infarct size by LGE within the first week. Patients were divided into groups: (1) abnormal QRS-T angle ≥ 90 degree and (2) QRS-T angle < 90 degree. Results: Patients with a QRS-T angle of 90 degree or more had larger infarcts (36.5±12.4 vs. 13.3±9.5; p<0.001) and lower ejection fraction (42.9±12.1% vs. 50.6±10.6%; p<0.001). Conclusion: The extent of myocardial damage as measured by the gold standard LGE is associated with a larger QRS-T angle calculated from the surface EKG.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7484652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Ivyspring International Publisher
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74846522020-09-12 QRS-T-angle in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) - a Comparison with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Zadeh, B. Wambach, J. M. Lambers, M. Nassenstein, K. Jensen, C.J. Bruder, O. Int J Med Sci Research Paper Background: The QRS-T angle from the surface EKG is a promising prognostic marker in patients with coronary artery disease. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) offers high resolution imaging of myocardial damage. We investigated the association of the QRS-T angle and the extent of myocardial damage as assessed by LGE in patients with acute ST-segment myocardial infarction (STEMI) Methods: 169 patients with STEMI obtained a standardized digital 12-lead EKG on admission for the calculation of the QRS-T angle and underwent CMR imaging for analysis of infarct size by LGE within the first week. Patients were divided into groups: (1) abnormal QRS-T angle ≥ 90 degree and (2) QRS-T angle < 90 degree. Results: Patients with a QRS-T angle of 90 degree or more had larger infarcts (36.5±12.4 vs. 13.3±9.5; p<0.001) and lower ejection fraction (42.9±12.1% vs. 50.6±10.6%; p<0.001). Conclusion: The extent of myocardial damage as measured by the gold standard LGE is associated with a larger QRS-T angle calculated from the surface EKG. Ivyspring International Publisher 2020-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7484652/ /pubmed/32922190 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/ijms.44312 Text en © The author(s) This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Zadeh, B.
Wambach, J. M.
Lambers, M.
Nassenstein, K.
Jensen, C.J.
Bruder, O.
QRS-T-angle in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) - a Comparison with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title QRS-T-angle in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) - a Comparison with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full QRS-T-angle in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) - a Comparison with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_fullStr QRS-T-angle in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) - a Comparison with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full_unstemmed QRS-T-angle in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) - a Comparison with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_short QRS-T-angle in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) - a Comparison with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_sort qrs-t-angle in patients with st-segment elevation myocardial infarction (stemi) - a comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7484652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32922190
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/ijms.44312
work_keys_str_mv AT zadehb qrstangleinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionstemiacomparisonwithcardiacmagneticresonanceimaging
AT wambachjm qrstangleinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionstemiacomparisonwithcardiacmagneticresonanceimaging
AT lambersm qrstangleinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionstemiacomparisonwithcardiacmagneticresonanceimaging
AT nassensteink qrstangleinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionstemiacomparisonwithcardiacmagneticresonanceimaging
AT jensencj qrstangleinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionstemiacomparisonwithcardiacmagneticresonanceimaging
AT brudero qrstangleinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionstemiacomparisonwithcardiacmagneticresonanceimaging