Cargando…

Results and Lessons Learned on Robotic Assisted Kidney Transplantation

INTRODUCTION: Nowadays, minimally invasive surgery in kidney transplantation is a reality thanks to robotic assistance. In this paper, we describe our experience, how we developed the robotic assisted Kidney transplantation (RAKT) technique, and analyze our results. Material and Methods. This is a r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Musquera, Mireia, Peri, Lluis, Ajami, Tarek, Revuelta, Ignacio, Izquierdo, Laura, Mercader, Claudia, Sierra, Alba, Diekmann, Fritz, D'Anna, Maurizio, Monsalve, Concepción, Alcaraz, Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7484686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32934965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8687907
_version_ 1783581023107284992
author Musquera, Mireia
Peri, Lluis
Ajami, Tarek
Revuelta, Ignacio
Izquierdo, Laura
Mercader, Claudia
Sierra, Alba
Diekmann, Fritz
D'Anna, Maurizio
Monsalve, Concepción
Alcaraz, Antonio
author_facet Musquera, Mireia
Peri, Lluis
Ajami, Tarek
Revuelta, Ignacio
Izquierdo, Laura
Mercader, Claudia
Sierra, Alba
Diekmann, Fritz
D'Anna, Maurizio
Monsalve, Concepción
Alcaraz, Antonio
author_sort Musquera, Mireia
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Nowadays, minimally invasive surgery in kidney transplantation is a reality thanks to robotic assistance. In this paper, we describe our experience, how we developed the robotic assisted Kidney transplantation (RAKT) technique, and analyze our results. Material and Methods. This is a retrospective study of all RAKTs performed at our center between July 2015 and March 2020. We describe the donor selection, surgical technique, and analyze the surgical results and complications. A comparison between the first 20 cases and the following ones is performed. RESULTS: During the aforementioned period, 82 living donor RAKTs were performed. The mean age was 47.4 ± 13.4 and 50 (61%) were male. Mean body mass index was 25 ± 4.7 and preemptive in 63.7% of cases. Right kidneys and multiple arteries were seen in 14.6% and 12.2%, respectively. Mean operative and rewarming time was 197 ± 42 and 47 ± 9.6 minutes, respectively. Five cases required conversion to open surgery because of abnormal kidney vascularization. Two patients required embolization for subcapsular and hypogastric artery bleeding without repercussion. Three kidneys were lost, two of them due to acute rejection and one because venous thrombosis. Late complications requiring surgery included one kidney artery stenosis, one ureteral stenosis, two lymphoceles, and three hernia repairs. We noticed a significant reduction in time between the first 20 cases and the following ones from 248.25 ± 38.1 to 189.75 ± 25.3 (p < 0.05). With a mean follow-up time of 1.8 years (SD 1.3), the mean creatinine was 1.52 (SD 0.7) and RAKT graft survival was 98%. CONCLUSIONS: The robotic approach is an attractive, minimally invasive method for kidney transplantation, yielding good results. Further studies are needed to consider it a standard approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7484686
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74846862020-09-14 Results and Lessons Learned on Robotic Assisted Kidney Transplantation Musquera, Mireia Peri, Lluis Ajami, Tarek Revuelta, Ignacio Izquierdo, Laura Mercader, Claudia Sierra, Alba Diekmann, Fritz D'Anna, Maurizio Monsalve, Concepción Alcaraz, Antonio Biomed Res Int Research Article INTRODUCTION: Nowadays, minimally invasive surgery in kidney transplantation is a reality thanks to robotic assistance. In this paper, we describe our experience, how we developed the robotic assisted Kidney transplantation (RAKT) technique, and analyze our results. Material and Methods. This is a retrospective study of all RAKTs performed at our center between July 2015 and March 2020. We describe the donor selection, surgical technique, and analyze the surgical results and complications. A comparison between the first 20 cases and the following ones is performed. RESULTS: During the aforementioned period, 82 living donor RAKTs were performed. The mean age was 47.4 ± 13.4 and 50 (61%) were male. Mean body mass index was 25 ± 4.7 and preemptive in 63.7% of cases. Right kidneys and multiple arteries were seen in 14.6% and 12.2%, respectively. Mean operative and rewarming time was 197 ± 42 and 47 ± 9.6 minutes, respectively. Five cases required conversion to open surgery because of abnormal kidney vascularization. Two patients required embolization for subcapsular and hypogastric artery bleeding without repercussion. Three kidneys were lost, two of them due to acute rejection and one because venous thrombosis. Late complications requiring surgery included one kidney artery stenosis, one ureteral stenosis, two lymphoceles, and three hernia repairs. We noticed a significant reduction in time between the first 20 cases and the following ones from 248.25 ± 38.1 to 189.75 ± 25.3 (p < 0.05). With a mean follow-up time of 1.8 years (SD 1.3), the mean creatinine was 1.52 (SD 0.7) and RAKT graft survival was 98%. CONCLUSIONS: The robotic approach is an attractive, minimally invasive method for kidney transplantation, yielding good results. Further studies are needed to consider it a standard approach. Hindawi 2020-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7484686/ /pubmed/32934965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8687907 Text en Copyright © 2020 Mireia Musquera et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Musquera, Mireia
Peri, Lluis
Ajami, Tarek
Revuelta, Ignacio
Izquierdo, Laura
Mercader, Claudia
Sierra, Alba
Diekmann, Fritz
D'Anna, Maurizio
Monsalve, Concepción
Alcaraz, Antonio
Results and Lessons Learned on Robotic Assisted Kidney Transplantation
title Results and Lessons Learned on Robotic Assisted Kidney Transplantation
title_full Results and Lessons Learned on Robotic Assisted Kidney Transplantation
title_fullStr Results and Lessons Learned on Robotic Assisted Kidney Transplantation
title_full_unstemmed Results and Lessons Learned on Robotic Assisted Kidney Transplantation
title_short Results and Lessons Learned on Robotic Assisted Kidney Transplantation
title_sort results and lessons learned on robotic assisted kidney transplantation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7484686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32934965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8687907
work_keys_str_mv AT musqueramireia resultsandlessonslearnedonroboticassistedkidneytransplantation
AT perilluis resultsandlessonslearnedonroboticassistedkidneytransplantation
AT ajamitarek resultsandlessonslearnedonroboticassistedkidneytransplantation
AT revueltaignacio resultsandlessonslearnedonroboticassistedkidneytransplantation
AT izquierdolaura resultsandlessonslearnedonroboticassistedkidneytransplantation
AT mercaderclaudia resultsandlessonslearnedonroboticassistedkidneytransplantation
AT sierraalba resultsandlessonslearnedonroboticassistedkidneytransplantation
AT diekmannfritz resultsandlessonslearnedonroboticassistedkidneytransplantation
AT dannamaurizio resultsandlessonslearnedonroboticassistedkidneytransplantation
AT monsalveconcepcion resultsandlessonslearnedonroboticassistedkidneytransplantation
AT alcarazantonio resultsandlessonslearnedonroboticassistedkidneytransplantation