Cargando…

Boosting radiotherapy dose calculation accuracy with deep learning

In radiotherapy, a trade‐off exists between computational workload/speed and dose calculation accuracy. Calculation methods like pencil‐beam convolution can be much faster than Monte‐Carlo methods, but less accurate. The dose difference, mostly caused by inhomogeneities and electronic disequilibrium...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xing, Yixun, Zhang, You, Nguyen, Dan, Lin, Mu‐Han, Lu, Weiguo, Jiang, Steve
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7484829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32559018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12937
_version_ 1783581053397499904
author Xing, Yixun
Zhang, You
Nguyen, Dan
Lin, Mu‐Han
Lu, Weiguo
Jiang, Steve
author_facet Xing, Yixun
Zhang, You
Nguyen, Dan
Lin, Mu‐Han
Lu, Weiguo
Jiang, Steve
author_sort Xing, Yixun
collection PubMed
description In radiotherapy, a trade‐off exists between computational workload/speed and dose calculation accuracy. Calculation methods like pencil‐beam convolution can be much faster than Monte‐Carlo methods, but less accurate. The dose difference, mostly caused by inhomogeneities and electronic disequilibrium, is highly correlated with the dose distribution and the underlying anatomical tissue density. We hypothesize that a conversion scheme can be established to boost low‐accuracy doses to high‐accuracy, using intensity information obtained from computed tomography (CT) images. A deep learning‐driven framework was developed to test the hypothesis by converting between two commercially available dose calculation methods: Anisotropic analytic algorithm (AAA) and Acuros XB (AXB). A hierarchically dense U‐Net model was developed to boost the accuracy of AAA dose toward the AXB level. The network contained multiple layers of varying feature sizes to learn their dose differences, in relationship to CT, both locally and globally. Anisotropic analytic algorithm and AXB doses were calculated in pairs for 120 lung radiotherapy plans covering various treatment techniques, beam energies, tumor locations, and dose levels. For each case, the CT and the AAA dose were used as the input and the AXB dose as the “ground‐truth” output, to train and test the model. The mean squared errors (MSEs) and gamma passing rates (2 mm/2% & 1 mm/1%) were calculated between the boosted AAA doses and the “ground‐truth” AXB doses. The boosted AAA doses demonstrated substantially improved match to the “ground‐truth” AXB doses, with average (± s.d.) gamma passing rate (1 mm/1%) 97.6% (±2.4%) compared to 87.8% (±9.0%) of the original AAA doses. The corresponding average MSE was 0.11(±0.05) vs 0.31(±0.21). Deep learning is able to capture the differences between dose calculation algorithms to boost the low‐accuracy algorithms. By combining a less accurate dose calculation algorithm with a trained deep learning model, dose calculation can potentially achieve both high accuracy and efficiency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7484829
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74848292020-09-17 Boosting radiotherapy dose calculation accuracy with deep learning Xing, Yixun Zhang, You Nguyen, Dan Lin, Mu‐Han Lu, Weiguo Jiang, Steve J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics In radiotherapy, a trade‐off exists between computational workload/speed and dose calculation accuracy. Calculation methods like pencil‐beam convolution can be much faster than Monte‐Carlo methods, but less accurate. The dose difference, mostly caused by inhomogeneities and electronic disequilibrium, is highly correlated with the dose distribution and the underlying anatomical tissue density. We hypothesize that a conversion scheme can be established to boost low‐accuracy doses to high‐accuracy, using intensity information obtained from computed tomography (CT) images. A deep learning‐driven framework was developed to test the hypothesis by converting between two commercially available dose calculation methods: Anisotropic analytic algorithm (AAA) and Acuros XB (AXB). A hierarchically dense U‐Net model was developed to boost the accuracy of AAA dose toward the AXB level. The network contained multiple layers of varying feature sizes to learn their dose differences, in relationship to CT, both locally and globally. Anisotropic analytic algorithm and AXB doses were calculated in pairs for 120 lung radiotherapy plans covering various treatment techniques, beam energies, tumor locations, and dose levels. For each case, the CT and the AAA dose were used as the input and the AXB dose as the “ground‐truth” output, to train and test the model. The mean squared errors (MSEs) and gamma passing rates (2 mm/2% & 1 mm/1%) were calculated between the boosted AAA doses and the “ground‐truth” AXB doses. The boosted AAA doses demonstrated substantially improved match to the “ground‐truth” AXB doses, with average (± s.d.) gamma passing rate (1 mm/1%) 97.6% (±2.4%) compared to 87.8% (±9.0%) of the original AAA doses. The corresponding average MSE was 0.11(±0.05) vs 0.31(±0.21). Deep learning is able to capture the differences between dose calculation algorithms to boost the low‐accuracy algorithms. By combining a less accurate dose calculation algorithm with a trained deep learning model, dose calculation can potentially achieve both high accuracy and efficiency. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7484829/ /pubmed/32559018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12937 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Xing, Yixun
Zhang, You
Nguyen, Dan
Lin, Mu‐Han
Lu, Weiguo
Jiang, Steve
Boosting radiotherapy dose calculation accuracy with deep learning
title Boosting radiotherapy dose calculation accuracy with deep learning
title_full Boosting radiotherapy dose calculation accuracy with deep learning
title_fullStr Boosting radiotherapy dose calculation accuracy with deep learning
title_full_unstemmed Boosting radiotherapy dose calculation accuracy with deep learning
title_short Boosting radiotherapy dose calculation accuracy with deep learning
title_sort boosting radiotherapy dose calculation accuracy with deep learning
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7484829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32559018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12937
work_keys_str_mv AT xingyixun boostingradiotherapydosecalculationaccuracywithdeeplearning
AT zhangyou boostingradiotherapydosecalculationaccuracywithdeeplearning
AT nguyendan boostingradiotherapydosecalculationaccuracywithdeeplearning
AT linmuhan boostingradiotherapydosecalculationaccuracywithdeeplearning
AT luweiguo boostingradiotherapydosecalculationaccuracywithdeeplearning
AT jiangsteve boostingradiotherapydosecalculationaccuracywithdeeplearning