Cargando…

Predictive quality assurance of a linear accelerator based on the machine performance check application using statistical process control and ARIMA forecast modeling

PURPOSE: A predictive linac quality assurance system based on the output of the Machine Performance Check (MPC) application was developed using statistical process control and autoregressive integrated moving average forecast modeling. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility of predi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Puyati, Wayo, Khawne, Amnach, Barnes, Michael, Zwan, Benjamin, Greer, Peter, Fuangrod, Todsaporn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7484849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32543097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12917
_version_ 1783581058133917696
author Puyati, Wayo
Khawne, Amnach
Barnes, Michael
Zwan, Benjamin
Greer, Peter
Fuangrod, Todsaporn
author_facet Puyati, Wayo
Khawne, Amnach
Barnes, Michael
Zwan, Benjamin
Greer, Peter
Fuangrod, Todsaporn
author_sort Puyati, Wayo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: A predictive linac quality assurance system based on the output of the Machine Performance Check (MPC) application was developed using statistical process control and autoregressive integrated moving average forecast modeling. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility of predictive quality assurance based on MPC tests that allow proactive preventative maintenance procedures to be carried out to better ensure optimal linac performance and minimize downtime. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Daily MPC data were acquired for a total of 490 measurements. The initial 85% of data were used in prediction model learning with the autoregressive integrated moving average technique and in calculating upper and lower control limits for statistical process control analysis. The remaining 15% of data were used in testing the accuracy of the predictions of the proposed system. Two types of prediction were studied, namely, one‐step‐ahead values for predicting the next day's quality assurance results and six‐step‐ahead values for predicting up to a week ahead. Results that fall within the upper and lower control limits indicate a normal stage of machine performance, while the tolerance, determined from AAPM TG‐142, is the clinically required performance. The gap between the control limits and the clinical tolerances (as the warning stage) provides a window of opportunity for rectifying linac performance issues before they become clinically significant. The accuracy of the predictive model was tested using the root‐mean‐square error, absolute error, and average accuracy rate for all MPC test parameters. RESULTS: The accuracy of the predictive model is considered high (average root‐mean‐square error and absolute error for all parameters of less than 0.05). The average accuracy rate for indicating the normal/warning stages was higher than 85.00%. CONCLUSION: Predictive quality assurance with the MPC will allow preventative maintenance, which could lead to improved linac performance and a reduction in unscheduled linac downtime.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7484849
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74848492020-09-17 Predictive quality assurance of a linear accelerator based on the machine performance check application using statistical process control and ARIMA forecast modeling Puyati, Wayo Khawne, Amnach Barnes, Michael Zwan, Benjamin Greer, Peter Fuangrod, Todsaporn J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: A predictive linac quality assurance system based on the output of the Machine Performance Check (MPC) application was developed using statistical process control and autoregressive integrated moving average forecast modeling. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility of predictive quality assurance based on MPC tests that allow proactive preventative maintenance procedures to be carried out to better ensure optimal linac performance and minimize downtime. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Daily MPC data were acquired for a total of 490 measurements. The initial 85% of data were used in prediction model learning with the autoregressive integrated moving average technique and in calculating upper and lower control limits for statistical process control analysis. The remaining 15% of data were used in testing the accuracy of the predictions of the proposed system. Two types of prediction were studied, namely, one‐step‐ahead values for predicting the next day's quality assurance results and six‐step‐ahead values for predicting up to a week ahead. Results that fall within the upper and lower control limits indicate a normal stage of machine performance, while the tolerance, determined from AAPM TG‐142, is the clinically required performance. The gap between the control limits and the clinical tolerances (as the warning stage) provides a window of opportunity for rectifying linac performance issues before they become clinically significant. The accuracy of the predictive model was tested using the root‐mean‐square error, absolute error, and average accuracy rate for all MPC test parameters. RESULTS: The accuracy of the predictive model is considered high (average root‐mean‐square error and absolute error for all parameters of less than 0.05). The average accuracy rate for indicating the normal/warning stages was higher than 85.00%. CONCLUSION: Predictive quality assurance with the MPC will allow preventative maintenance, which could lead to improved linac performance and a reduction in unscheduled linac downtime. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7484849/ /pubmed/32543097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12917 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Puyati, Wayo
Khawne, Amnach
Barnes, Michael
Zwan, Benjamin
Greer, Peter
Fuangrod, Todsaporn
Predictive quality assurance of a linear accelerator based on the machine performance check application using statistical process control and ARIMA forecast modeling
title Predictive quality assurance of a linear accelerator based on the machine performance check application using statistical process control and ARIMA forecast modeling
title_full Predictive quality assurance of a linear accelerator based on the machine performance check application using statistical process control and ARIMA forecast modeling
title_fullStr Predictive quality assurance of a linear accelerator based on the machine performance check application using statistical process control and ARIMA forecast modeling
title_full_unstemmed Predictive quality assurance of a linear accelerator based on the machine performance check application using statistical process control and ARIMA forecast modeling
title_short Predictive quality assurance of a linear accelerator based on the machine performance check application using statistical process control and ARIMA forecast modeling
title_sort predictive quality assurance of a linear accelerator based on the machine performance check application using statistical process control and arima forecast modeling
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7484849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32543097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12917
work_keys_str_mv AT puyatiwayo predictivequalityassuranceofalinearacceleratorbasedonthemachineperformancecheckapplicationusingstatisticalprocesscontrolandarimaforecastmodeling
AT khawneamnach predictivequalityassuranceofalinearacceleratorbasedonthemachineperformancecheckapplicationusingstatisticalprocesscontrolandarimaforecastmodeling
AT barnesmichael predictivequalityassuranceofalinearacceleratorbasedonthemachineperformancecheckapplicationusingstatisticalprocesscontrolandarimaforecastmodeling
AT zwanbenjamin predictivequalityassuranceofalinearacceleratorbasedonthemachineperformancecheckapplicationusingstatisticalprocesscontrolandarimaforecastmodeling
AT greerpeter predictivequalityassuranceofalinearacceleratorbasedonthemachineperformancecheckapplicationusingstatisticalprocesscontrolandarimaforecastmodeling
AT fuangrodtodsaporn predictivequalityassuranceofalinearacceleratorbasedonthemachineperformancecheckapplicationusingstatisticalprocesscontrolandarimaforecastmodeling