Cargando…

Using failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) to generate an initial plan check checklist for improved safety in radiation treatment

PURPOSE: To apply failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) to generate an effective and efficient initial physics plan checklist. METHODS: A team of physicists, dosimetrists, and therapists was setup to reconstruct the workflow processes involved in the generation of a treatment plan beginning from s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rassiah, Prema, Su, Fan‐Chi Frances, Huang, Y. Jessica, Spitznagel, Dan, Sarkar, Vikren, Szegedi, Martin W., Zhao, Hui, Paxton, Adam B., Nelson, Geoff, Salter, Bill J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7484852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32583912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12918
_version_ 1783581058860580864
author Rassiah, Prema
Su, Fan‐Chi Frances
Huang, Y. Jessica
Spitznagel, Dan
Sarkar, Vikren
Szegedi, Martin W.
Zhao, Hui
Paxton, Adam B.
Nelson, Geoff
Salter, Bill J.
author_facet Rassiah, Prema
Su, Fan‐Chi Frances
Huang, Y. Jessica
Spitznagel, Dan
Sarkar, Vikren
Szegedi, Martin W.
Zhao, Hui
Paxton, Adam B.
Nelson, Geoff
Salter, Bill J.
author_sort Rassiah, Prema
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To apply failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) to generate an effective and efficient initial physics plan checklist. METHODS: A team of physicists, dosimetrists, and therapists was setup to reconstruct the workflow processes involved in the generation of a treatment plan beginning from simulation. The team then identified possible failure modes in each of the processes. For each failure mode, the severity (S), frequency of occurrence (O), and the probability of detection (D) was assigned a value and the risk priority number (RPN) was calculated. The values assigned were based on TG 100. Prior to assigning a value, the team discussed the values in the scoring system to minimize randomness in scoring. A local database of errors was used to help guide the scoring of frequency. RESULTS: Twenty‐seven process steps and 50 possible failure modes were identified starting from simulation to the final approved plan ready for treatment at the machine. Any failure mode that scored an average RPN value of 20 or greater was deemed “eligible” to be placed on the second checklist. In addition, any failure mode with a severity score value of 4 or greater was also considered for inclusion in the checklist. As a by‐product of this procedure, safety improvement methods such as automation and standardization of certain processes (e.g., dose constraint checking, check tools), removal of manual transcription of treatment‐related information as well as staff education were implemented, although this was not the team's original objective. Prior to the implementation of the new FMEA‐based checklist, an in‐service for all the second checkers was organized to ensure further standardization of the process. CONCLUSION: The FMEA proved to be a valuable tool for identifying vulnerabilities in our workflow and processes in generating a treatment plan and subsequently a new, more effective initial plan checklist was created.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7484852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74848522020-09-17 Using failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) to generate an initial plan check checklist for improved safety in radiation treatment Rassiah, Prema Su, Fan‐Chi Frances Huang, Y. Jessica Spitznagel, Dan Sarkar, Vikren Szegedi, Martin W. Zhao, Hui Paxton, Adam B. Nelson, Geoff Salter, Bill J. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: To apply failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) to generate an effective and efficient initial physics plan checklist. METHODS: A team of physicists, dosimetrists, and therapists was setup to reconstruct the workflow processes involved in the generation of a treatment plan beginning from simulation. The team then identified possible failure modes in each of the processes. For each failure mode, the severity (S), frequency of occurrence (O), and the probability of detection (D) was assigned a value and the risk priority number (RPN) was calculated. The values assigned were based on TG 100. Prior to assigning a value, the team discussed the values in the scoring system to minimize randomness in scoring. A local database of errors was used to help guide the scoring of frequency. RESULTS: Twenty‐seven process steps and 50 possible failure modes were identified starting from simulation to the final approved plan ready for treatment at the machine. Any failure mode that scored an average RPN value of 20 or greater was deemed “eligible” to be placed on the second checklist. In addition, any failure mode with a severity score value of 4 or greater was also considered for inclusion in the checklist. As a by‐product of this procedure, safety improvement methods such as automation and standardization of certain processes (e.g., dose constraint checking, check tools), removal of manual transcription of treatment‐related information as well as staff education were implemented, although this was not the team's original objective. Prior to the implementation of the new FMEA‐based checklist, an in‐service for all the second checkers was organized to ensure further standardization of the process. CONCLUSION: The FMEA proved to be a valuable tool for identifying vulnerabilities in our workflow and processes in generating a treatment plan and subsequently a new, more effective initial plan checklist was created. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7484852/ /pubmed/32583912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12918 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Rassiah, Prema
Su, Fan‐Chi Frances
Huang, Y. Jessica
Spitznagel, Dan
Sarkar, Vikren
Szegedi, Martin W.
Zhao, Hui
Paxton, Adam B.
Nelson, Geoff
Salter, Bill J.
Using failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) to generate an initial plan check checklist for improved safety in radiation treatment
title Using failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) to generate an initial plan check checklist for improved safety in radiation treatment
title_full Using failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) to generate an initial plan check checklist for improved safety in radiation treatment
title_fullStr Using failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) to generate an initial plan check checklist for improved safety in radiation treatment
title_full_unstemmed Using failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) to generate an initial plan check checklist for improved safety in radiation treatment
title_short Using failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) to generate an initial plan check checklist for improved safety in radiation treatment
title_sort using failure mode and effects analysis (fmea) to generate an initial plan check checklist for improved safety in radiation treatment
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7484852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32583912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12918
work_keys_str_mv AT rassiahprema usingfailuremodeandeffectsanalysisfmeatogenerateaninitialplancheckchecklistforimprovedsafetyinradiationtreatment
AT sufanchifrances usingfailuremodeandeffectsanalysisfmeatogenerateaninitialplancheckchecklistforimprovedsafetyinradiationtreatment
AT huangyjessica usingfailuremodeandeffectsanalysisfmeatogenerateaninitialplancheckchecklistforimprovedsafetyinradiationtreatment
AT spitznageldan usingfailuremodeandeffectsanalysisfmeatogenerateaninitialplancheckchecklistforimprovedsafetyinradiationtreatment
AT sarkarvikren usingfailuremodeandeffectsanalysisfmeatogenerateaninitialplancheckchecklistforimprovedsafetyinradiationtreatment
AT szegedimartinw usingfailuremodeandeffectsanalysisfmeatogenerateaninitialplancheckchecklistforimprovedsafetyinradiationtreatment
AT zhaohui usingfailuremodeandeffectsanalysisfmeatogenerateaninitialplancheckchecklistforimprovedsafetyinradiationtreatment
AT paxtonadamb usingfailuremodeandeffectsanalysisfmeatogenerateaninitialplancheckchecklistforimprovedsafetyinradiationtreatment
AT nelsongeoff usingfailuremodeandeffectsanalysisfmeatogenerateaninitialplancheckchecklistforimprovedsafetyinradiationtreatment
AT salterbillj usingfailuremodeandeffectsanalysisfmeatogenerateaninitialplancheckchecklistforimprovedsafetyinradiationtreatment