Cargando…
Does In Vitro Potency Predict Clinically Efficacious Concentrations?
The in vitro affinity of a compound for its target is an important feature in drug discovery, but what remains is how predictive in vitro properties are of in vivo therapeutic drug exposure. We assessed the relationship between in vitro potency and clinically efficacious concentrations for marketed...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7484912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32275768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1846 |
_version_ | 1783581069113556992 |
---|---|
author | Jansson‐Löfmark, Rasmus Hjorth, Stephan Gabrielsson, Johan |
author_facet | Jansson‐Löfmark, Rasmus Hjorth, Stephan Gabrielsson, Johan |
author_sort | Jansson‐Löfmark, Rasmus |
collection | PubMed |
description | The in vitro affinity of a compound for its target is an important feature in drug discovery, but what remains is how predictive in vitro properties are of in vivo therapeutic drug exposure. We assessed the relationship between in vitro potency and clinically efficacious concentrations for marketed small molecule drugs (n = 164) and how they may differ depending on therapeutic indication, mode of action, receptor type, target localization, and function. Approximately 70% of compounds had a therapeutic unbound plasma exposure lower than in vitro potency; the median ratio of exposure in relation to in vitro potency was 0.32, and 80% had ratios within the range of 0.007 to 8.7. We identified differences in the in vivo–to–in vitro potency ratio between indications, mode of action, target type, and matrix localization, and whether or not the drugs had active metabolites. The in vitro–assay variability contributions appeared to be the smallest; within the same drug target and mode of action the within‐variability was slightly broader; but both were substantially less compared with the overall distribution of ratios. These data suggest that in vitro potency conditions, estimated in vivo potency, required level of receptor occupancy, and target turnover are key components for further understanding the link between clinical drug exposure and in vitro potency. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7484912 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74849122020-09-18 Does In Vitro Potency Predict Clinically Efficacious Concentrations? Jansson‐Löfmark, Rasmus Hjorth, Stephan Gabrielsson, Johan Clin Pharmacol Ther Research The in vitro affinity of a compound for its target is an important feature in drug discovery, but what remains is how predictive in vitro properties are of in vivo therapeutic drug exposure. We assessed the relationship between in vitro potency and clinically efficacious concentrations for marketed small molecule drugs (n = 164) and how they may differ depending on therapeutic indication, mode of action, receptor type, target localization, and function. Approximately 70% of compounds had a therapeutic unbound plasma exposure lower than in vitro potency; the median ratio of exposure in relation to in vitro potency was 0.32, and 80% had ratios within the range of 0.007 to 8.7. We identified differences in the in vivo–to–in vitro potency ratio between indications, mode of action, target type, and matrix localization, and whether or not the drugs had active metabolites. The in vitro–assay variability contributions appeared to be the smallest; within the same drug target and mode of action the within‐variability was slightly broader; but both were substantially less compared with the overall distribution of ratios. These data suggest that in vitro potency conditions, estimated in vivo potency, required level of receptor occupancy, and target turnover are key components for further understanding the link between clinical drug exposure and in vitro potency. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-10 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7484912/ /pubmed/32275768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1846 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Research Jansson‐Löfmark, Rasmus Hjorth, Stephan Gabrielsson, Johan Does In Vitro Potency Predict Clinically Efficacious Concentrations? |
title | Does In Vitro Potency Predict Clinically Efficacious Concentrations? |
title_full | Does In Vitro Potency Predict Clinically Efficacious Concentrations? |
title_fullStr | Does In Vitro Potency Predict Clinically Efficacious Concentrations? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does In Vitro Potency Predict Clinically Efficacious Concentrations? |
title_short | Does In Vitro Potency Predict Clinically Efficacious Concentrations? |
title_sort | does in vitro potency predict clinically efficacious concentrations? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7484912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32275768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1846 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT janssonlofmarkrasmus doesinvitropotencypredictclinicallyefficaciousconcentrations AT hjorthstephan doesinvitropotencypredictclinicallyefficaciousconcentrations AT gabrielssonjohan doesinvitropotencypredictclinicallyefficaciousconcentrations |