Cargando…
Anterocentral Portal in Ankle Arthroscopy
BACKGROUND: The anterocentral portal is not a standard portal in anterior ankle arthroscopy due to its proximity to the anterior neurovascular bundle. However, it provides certain advantages, including a wide field of vision, and portal changes become redundant. The purpose of this study was to eval...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7485013/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32546005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1071100720931095 |
_version_ | 1783581084383969280 |
---|---|
author | Stotter, Christoph Klestil, Thomas Chemelli, Andreas Naderi, Vahid Nehrer, Stefan Reuter, Philippe |
author_facet | Stotter, Christoph Klestil, Thomas Chemelli, Andreas Naderi, Vahid Nehrer, Stefan Reuter, Philippe |
author_sort | Stotter, Christoph |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The anterocentral portal is not a standard portal in anterior ankle arthroscopy due to its proximity to the anterior neurovascular bundle. However, it provides certain advantages, including a wide field of vision, and portal changes become redundant. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the neurovascular complications after anterior ankle arthroscopy using the anterocentral portal. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients who had undergone anterior ankle arthroscopy with an anterocentral portal at our institution from 2013 to 2018. Medical record data were reviewed and patients were invited for clinical follow-up, where a clinical examination, quantitative sensory testing for the deep peroneal nerve, and ultrasonography of the structures at risk were performed. A total of 101 patients (105 arthroscopies) were identified and evaluated at a mean follow-up of 31.5 ± 17.7 months. RESULTS: Leading indications to surgery were heterogeneous and included anterior impingement (48.6%), osteochondral lesions of the talus (24.8%), chronic ankle instability (14.3%), and fractures (8.6%). The overall complication rate was 7.6%, and no major complications were observed. In 1.9% (2/105) of the cases, the complications were associated with the anterocentral portal and included injury to the medial branch of the superficial nerve (1/105) and to the deep peroneal nerve (1/105). Injury to the deep peroneal nerve was associated with a loss of detection and nociception. There were no injuries to the anterior tibial artery. In 41.9% (44/105) of the cases, only 1 working portal was used in addition to the anterocentral portal, and in 19% (20/105) the anterolateral portal could be avoided. Ultrasonography confirmed the integrity of the deep peroneal nerve, the medial branch of the superficial peroneal nerve, and the anterior tibial artery in all patients. Patients with nerve injuries associated with the anterocentral portal showed no signs of neuroma or pseudoaneurysm. CONCLUSION: Using a standardized technique, the anterocentral portal in ankle arthroscopy is safe with a low number of neurovascular injuries and can be recommended as a standard portal. The anterolateral portal remains associated with a high number of injuries to the superficial peroneal nerve. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7485013 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74850132020-09-24 Anterocentral Portal in Ankle Arthroscopy Stotter, Christoph Klestil, Thomas Chemelli, Andreas Naderi, Vahid Nehrer, Stefan Reuter, Philippe Foot Ankle Int Articles BACKGROUND: The anterocentral portal is not a standard portal in anterior ankle arthroscopy due to its proximity to the anterior neurovascular bundle. However, it provides certain advantages, including a wide field of vision, and portal changes become redundant. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the neurovascular complications after anterior ankle arthroscopy using the anterocentral portal. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients who had undergone anterior ankle arthroscopy with an anterocentral portal at our institution from 2013 to 2018. Medical record data were reviewed and patients were invited for clinical follow-up, where a clinical examination, quantitative sensory testing for the deep peroneal nerve, and ultrasonography of the structures at risk were performed. A total of 101 patients (105 arthroscopies) were identified and evaluated at a mean follow-up of 31.5 ± 17.7 months. RESULTS: Leading indications to surgery were heterogeneous and included anterior impingement (48.6%), osteochondral lesions of the talus (24.8%), chronic ankle instability (14.3%), and fractures (8.6%). The overall complication rate was 7.6%, and no major complications were observed. In 1.9% (2/105) of the cases, the complications were associated with the anterocentral portal and included injury to the medial branch of the superficial nerve (1/105) and to the deep peroneal nerve (1/105). Injury to the deep peroneal nerve was associated with a loss of detection and nociception. There were no injuries to the anterior tibial artery. In 41.9% (44/105) of the cases, only 1 working portal was used in addition to the anterocentral portal, and in 19% (20/105) the anterolateral portal could be avoided. Ultrasonography confirmed the integrity of the deep peroneal nerve, the medial branch of the superficial peroneal nerve, and the anterior tibial artery in all patients. Patients with nerve injuries associated with the anterocentral portal showed no signs of neuroma or pseudoaneurysm. CONCLUSION: Using a standardized technique, the anterocentral portal in ankle arthroscopy is safe with a low number of neurovascular injuries and can be recommended as a standard portal. The anterolateral portal remains associated with a high number of injuries to the superficial peroneal nerve. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study. SAGE Publications 2020-06-17 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7485013/ /pubmed/32546005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1071100720931095 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Articles Stotter, Christoph Klestil, Thomas Chemelli, Andreas Naderi, Vahid Nehrer, Stefan Reuter, Philippe Anterocentral Portal in Ankle Arthroscopy |
title | Anterocentral Portal in Ankle Arthroscopy |
title_full | Anterocentral Portal in Ankle Arthroscopy |
title_fullStr | Anterocentral Portal in Ankle Arthroscopy |
title_full_unstemmed | Anterocentral Portal in Ankle Arthroscopy |
title_short | Anterocentral Portal in Ankle Arthroscopy |
title_sort | anterocentral portal in ankle arthroscopy |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7485013/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32546005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1071100720931095 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stotterchristoph anterocentralportalinanklearthroscopy AT klestilthomas anterocentralportalinanklearthroscopy AT chemelliandreas anterocentralportalinanklearthroscopy AT naderivahid anterocentralportalinanklearthroscopy AT nehrerstefan anterocentralportalinanklearthroscopy AT reuterphilippe anterocentralportalinanklearthroscopy |