Cargando…
Classifying Complications: Assessing Adult Spinal Deformity 2-Year Surgical Outcomes
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospective database. OBJECTIVE: Complication rates for adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery vary widely because there is no accepted system for categorization. Our objective was to identify the impact of complication occurrence, minor-major complication, and Cl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7485066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32730730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568220937473 |
_version_ | 1783581085314056192 |
---|---|
author | Klineberg, Eric O. Passias, Peter G. Poorman, Gregory W. Jalai, Cyrus M. Atanda, Abiola Worley, Nancy Horn, Samantha Sciubba, Daniel M. Hamilton, D. Kojo Burton, Douglas C. Gupta, Munish Chandra Smith, Justin S. Soroceanu, Alexandra Hart, Robert A. Neuman, Brian Ames, Christopher P. Schwab, Frank J. Lafage, Virginie |
author_facet | Klineberg, Eric O. Passias, Peter G. Poorman, Gregory W. Jalai, Cyrus M. Atanda, Abiola Worley, Nancy Horn, Samantha Sciubba, Daniel M. Hamilton, D. Kojo Burton, Douglas C. Gupta, Munish Chandra Smith, Justin S. Soroceanu, Alexandra Hart, Robert A. Neuman, Brian Ames, Christopher P. Schwab, Frank J. Lafage, Virginie |
author_sort | Klineberg, Eric O. |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospective database. OBJECTIVE: Complication rates for adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery vary widely because there is no accepted system for categorization. Our objective was to identify the impact of complication occurrence, minor-major complication, and Clavien-Dindo complication classification (Cc) on clinical variables and patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: Complications in surgical ASD patients with complete baseline and 2-year data were considered intraoperatively, perioperatively (<6 weeks), and postoperatively (>6 weeks). Primary outcome measures were complication timing and severity according to 3 scales: complication presence (yes/no), minor-major, and Cc score. Secondary outcomes were surgical outcomes (estimated blood loss [EBL], length of stay [LOS], reoperation) and health-related quality of life (HRQL) scores. Univariate analyses determined complication presence, type, and Cc grade impact on operative variables and on HRQL scores. RESULTS: Of 167 patients, 30.5% (n = 51) had intraoperative, 48.5% (n = 81) had perioperative, and 58.7% (n = 98) had postoperative complications. Major intraoperative complications were associated with increased EBL (P < .001) and LOS (P = .0092). Postoperative complication presence and major postoperative complication were associated with reoperation (P < .001). At 2 years, major perioperative complications were associated with worse ODI, SF-36, and SRS activity and appearance scores (P < .02). Increasing perioperative Cc score and postoperative complication presence were the best predictors of worse HRQL outcomes (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The Cc Scale was most useful in predicting changes in patient outcomes; at 2 years, patients with raised perioperative Cc scores and postoperative complications saw reduced HRQL improvement. Intraoperative and perioperative complications were associated with worse short-term surgical and inpatient outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7485066 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74850662020-09-17 Classifying Complications: Assessing Adult Spinal Deformity 2-Year Surgical Outcomes Klineberg, Eric O. Passias, Peter G. Poorman, Gregory W. Jalai, Cyrus M. Atanda, Abiola Worley, Nancy Horn, Samantha Sciubba, Daniel M. Hamilton, D. Kojo Burton, Douglas C. Gupta, Munish Chandra Smith, Justin S. Soroceanu, Alexandra Hart, Robert A. Neuman, Brian Ames, Christopher P. Schwab, Frank J. Lafage, Virginie Global Spine J Original Articles STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospective database. OBJECTIVE: Complication rates for adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery vary widely because there is no accepted system for categorization. Our objective was to identify the impact of complication occurrence, minor-major complication, and Clavien-Dindo complication classification (Cc) on clinical variables and patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: Complications in surgical ASD patients with complete baseline and 2-year data were considered intraoperatively, perioperatively (<6 weeks), and postoperatively (>6 weeks). Primary outcome measures were complication timing and severity according to 3 scales: complication presence (yes/no), minor-major, and Cc score. Secondary outcomes were surgical outcomes (estimated blood loss [EBL], length of stay [LOS], reoperation) and health-related quality of life (HRQL) scores. Univariate analyses determined complication presence, type, and Cc grade impact on operative variables and on HRQL scores. RESULTS: Of 167 patients, 30.5% (n = 51) had intraoperative, 48.5% (n = 81) had perioperative, and 58.7% (n = 98) had postoperative complications. Major intraoperative complications were associated with increased EBL (P < .001) and LOS (P = .0092). Postoperative complication presence and major postoperative complication were associated with reoperation (P < .001). At 2 years, major perioperative complications were associated with worse ODI, SF-36, and SRS activity and appearance scores (P < .02). Increasing perioperative Cc score and postoperative complication presence were the best predictors of worse HRQL outcomes (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The Cc Scale was most useful in predicting changes in patient outcomes; at 2 years, patients with raised perioperative Cc scores and postoperative complications saw reduced HRQL improvement. Intraoperative and perioperative complications were associated with worse short-term surgical and inpatient outcomes. SAGE Publications 2020-07-30 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7485066/ /pubmed/32730730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568220937473 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Klineberg, Eric O. Passias, Peter G. Poorman, Gregory W. Jalai, Cyrus M. Atanda, Abiola Worley, Nancy Horn, Samantha Sciubba, Daniel M. Hamilton, D. Kojo Burton, Douglas C. Gupta, Munish Chandra Smith, Justin S. Soroceanu, Alexandra Hart, Robert A. Neuman, Brian Ames, Christopher P. Schwab, Frank J. Lafage, Virginie Classifying Complications: Assessing Adult Spinal Deformity 2-Year Surgical Outcomes |
title | Classifying Complications: Assessing Adult Spinal Deformity 2-Year Surgical Outcomes |
title_full | Classifying Complications: Assessing Adult Spinal Deformity 2-Year Surgical Outcomes |
title_fullStr | Classifying Complications: Assessing Adult Spinal Deformity 2-Year Surgical Outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Classifying Complications: Assessing Adult Spinal Deformity 2-Year Surgical Outcomes |
title_short | Classifying Complications: Assessing Adult Spinal Deformity 2-Year Surgical Outcomes |
title_sort | classifying complications: assessing adult spinal deformity 2-year surgical outcomes |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7485066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32730730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568220937473 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT klinebergerico classifyingcomplicationsassessingadultspinaldeformity2yearsurgicaloutcomes AT passiaspeterg classifyingcomplicationsassessingadultspinaldeformity2yearsurgicaloutcomes AT poormangregoryw classifyingcomplicationsassessingadultspinaldeformity2yearsurgicaloutcomes AT jalaicyrusm classifyingcomplicationsassessingadultspinaldeformity2yearsurgicaloutcomes AT atandaabiola classifyingcomplicationsassessingadultspinaldeformity2yearsurgicaloutcomes AT worleynancy classifyingcomplicationsassessingadultspinaldeformity2yearsurgicaloutcomes AT hornsamantha classifyingcomplicationsassessingadultspinaldeformity2yearsurgicaloutcomes AT sciubbadanielm classifyingcomplicationsassessingadultspinaldeformity2yearsurgicaloutcomes AT hamiltondkojo classifyingcomplicationsassessingadultspinaldeformity2yearsurgicaloutcomes AT burtondouglasc classifyingcomplicationsassessingadultspinaldeformity2yearsurgicaloutcomes AT guptamunishchandra classifyingcomplicationsassessingadultspinaldeformity2yearsurgicaloutcomes AT smithjustins classifyingcomplicationsassessingadultspinaldeformity2yearsurgicaloutcomes AT soroceanualexandra classifyingcomplicationsassessingadultspinaldeformity2yearsurgicaloutcomes AT hartroberta classifyingcomplicationsassessingadultspinaldeformity2yearsurgicaloutcomes AT neumanbrian classifyingcomplicationsassessingadultspinaldeformity2yearsurgicaloutcomes AT ameschristopherp classifyingcomplicationsassessingadultspinaldeformity2yearsurgicaloutcomes AT schwabfrankj classifyingcomplicationsassessingadultspinaldeformity2yearsurgicaloutcomes AT lafagevirginie classifyingcomplicationsassessingadultspinaldeformity2yearsurgicaloutcomes |