Cargando…
Assessment of Surgical Procedural Time, Pedicle Screw Accuracy, and Clinician Radiation Exposure of a Novel Robotic Navigation System Compared With Conventional Open and Percutaneous Freehand Techniques: A Cadaveric Investigation
STUDY DESIGN: Cadaveric study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate accuracy, radiation exposure, and surgical time of a new robotic-assisted navigation (RAN) platform compared with freehand techniques in conventional open and percutaneous procedures. METHODS: Ten board-certified surgeons inserted 16 pedicle scre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7485081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32905729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568219879083 |
_version_ | 1783581088796377088 |
---|---|
author | Vaccaro, Alexander R. Harris, Jonathan A. Hussain, Mir M. Wadhwa, Rishi Chang, Victor W. Schroerlucke, Samuel R. Samora, Walter P. Passias, Peter G. Patel, Rakesh D. Panchal, Ripul R. D’Agostino, Sabino Whitney, Nathaniel L. Crawford, Neil R. Bucklen, Brandon S. |
author_facet | Vaccaro, Alexander R. Harris, Jonathan A. Hussain, Mir M. Wadhwa, Rishi Chang, Victor W. Schroerlucke, Samuel R. Samora, Walter P. Passias, Peter G. Patel, Rakesh D. Panchal, Ripul R. D’Agostino, Sabino Whitney, Nathaniel L. Crawford, Neil R. Bucklen, Brandon S. |
author_sort | Vaccaro, Alexander R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN: Cadaveric study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate accuracy, radiation exposure, and surgical time of a new robotic-assisted navigation (RAN) platform compared with freehand techniques in conventional open and percutaneous procedures. METHODS: Ten board-certified surgeons inserted 16 pedicle screws at T10–L5 (n = 40 per technique) in 10 human cadaveric torsos. Pedicle screws were inserted with (1) conventional MIS technique (L2–L5, patient left pedicles), (2) MIS RAN (L2–L5, patient right pedicles), (3) conventional open technique (T10–L1, patient left pedicles), and (4) open RAN (T10–L1, patient right pedicles). Output included (1) operative time, (2) number of fluoroscopic images, and (3) screw accuracy. RESULTS: In the MIS group, compared with the freehand technique, RAN allowed for use of larger screws (diameter: 6.6 ± 0.6 mm vs 6.3 ± 0.5 mm; length: 50.3 ± 4.1 mm vs 46.9 ± 3.5 mm), decreased the number of breaches >2 mm (0 vs 7), fewer fluoroscopic images (0 ± 0 vs 108.3 ± 30.9), and surgical procedure time per screw (3.6 ± 0.4 minutes vs 7.6 ± 2.0 minutes) (all P < .05). Similarly, in the open group, RAN allowed for use of longer screws (46.1 ± 4.1 mm vs 44.0 ± 3.8 mm), decreased the number of breaches >2 mm (0 vs 13), fewer fluoroscopic images (0 ± 0 vs 24.1 ± 25.8) (all P < .05), but increased total surgical procedure time (41.4 ± 8.8 minutes vs 24.7 ± 7.0 minutes, P = .000) while maintaining screw insertion time (3.31.4 minutes vs 3.1 ± 1.0 minutes, P = .650). CONCLUSION: RAN significantly improved accuracy and decreased radiation exposure in comparison to freehand techniques in both conventional open and percutaneous surgical procedures in cadavers. RAN significantly increased setup time compared with both conventional procedures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7485081 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74850812020-09-17 Assessment of Surgical Procedural Time, Pedicle Screw Accuracy, and Clinician Radiation Exposure of a Novel Robotic Navigation System Compared With Conventional Open and Percutaneous Freehand Techniques: A Cadaveric Investigation Vaccaro, Alexander R. Harris, Jonathan A. Hussain, Mir M. Wadhwa, Rishi Chang, Victor W. Schroerlucke, Samuel R. Samora, Walter P. Passias, Peter G. Patel, Rakesh D. Panchal, Ripul R. D’Agostino, Sabino Whitney, Nathaniel L. Crawford, Neil R. Bucklen, Brandon S. Global Spine J Original Articles STUDY DESIGN: Cadaveric study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate accuracy, radiation exposure, and surgical time of a new robotic-assisted navigation (RAN) platform compared with freehand techniques in conventional open and percutaneous procedures. METHODS: Ten board-certified surgeons inserted 16 pedicle screws at T10–L5 (n = 40 per technique) in 10 human cadaveric torsos. Pedicle screws were inserted with (1) conventional MIS technique (L2–L5, patient left pedicles), (2) MIS RAN (L2–L5, patient right pedicles), (3) conventional open technique (T10–L1, patient left pedicles), and (4) open RAN (T10–L1, patient right pedicles). Output included (1) operative time, (2) number of fluoroscopic images, and (3) screw accuracy. RESULTS: In the MIS group, compared with the freehand technique, RAN allowed for use of larger screws (diameter: 6.6 ± 0.6 mm vs 6.3 ± 0.5 mm; length: 50.3 ± 4.1 mm vs 46.9 ± 3.5 mm), decreased the number of breaches >2 mm (0 vs 7), fewer fluoroscopic images (0 ± 0 vs 108.3 ± 30.9), and surgical procedure time per screw (3.6 ± 0.4 minutes vs 7.6 ± 2.0 minutes) (all P < .05). Similarly, in the open group, RAN allowed for use of longer screws (46.1 ± 4.1 mm vs 44.0 ± 3.8 mm), decreased the number of breaches >2 mm (0 vs 13), fewer fluoroscopic images (0 ± 0 vs 24.1 ± 25.8) (all P < .05), but increased total surgical procedure time (41.4 ± 8.8 minutes vs 24.7 ± 7.0 minutes, P = .000) while maintaining screw insertion time (3.31.4 minutes vs 3.1 ± 1.0 minutes, P = .650). CONCLUSION: RAN significantly improved accuracy and decreased radiation exposure in comparison to freehand techniques in both conventional open and percutaneous surgical procedures in cadavers. RAN significantly increased setup time compared with both conventional procedures. SAGE Publications 2019-09-24 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7485081/ /pubmed/32905729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568219879083 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Vaccaro, Alexander R. Harris, Jonathan A. Hussain, Mir M. Wadhwa, Rishi Chang, Victor W. Schroerlucke, Samuel R. Samora, Walter P. Passias, Peter G. Patel, Rakesh D. Panchal, Ripul R. D’Agostino, Sabino Whitney, Nathaniel L. Crawford, Neil R. Bucklen, Brandon S. Assessment of Surgical Procedural Time, Pedicle Screw Accuracy, and Clinician Radiation Exposure of a Novel Robotic Navigation System Compared With Conventional Open and Percutaneous Freehand Techniques: A Cadaveric Investigation |
title | Assessment of Surgical Procedural Time, Pedicle Screw Accuracy, and Clinician Radiation Exposure of a Novel Robotic Navigation System Compared With Conventional Open and Percutaneous Freehand Techniques: A Cadaveric Investigation |
title_full | Assessment of Surgical Procedural Time, Pedicle Screw Accuracy, and Clinician Radiation Exposure of a Novel Robotic Navigation System Compared With Conventional Open and Percutaneous Freehand Techniques: A Cadaveric Investigation |
title_fullStr | Assessment of Surgical Procedural Time, Pedicle Screw Accuracy, and Clinician Radiation Exposure of a Novel Robotic Navigation System Compared With Conventional Open and Percutaneous Freehand Techniques: A Cadaveric Investigation |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of Surgical Procedural Time, Pedicle Screw Accuracy, and Clinician Radiation Exposure of a Novel Robotic Navigation System Compared With Conventional Open and Percutaneous Freehand Techniques: A Cadaveric Investigation |
title_short | Assessment of Surgical Procedural Time, Pedicle Screw Accuracy, and Clinician Radiation Exposure of a Novel Robotic Navigation System Compared With Conventional Open and Percutaneous Freehand Techniques: A Cadaveric Investigation |
title_sort | assessment of surgical procedural time, pedicle screw accuracy, and clinician radiation exposure of a novel robotic navigation system compared with conventional open and percutaneous freehand techniques: a cadaveric investigation |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7485081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32905729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568219879083 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vaccaroalexanderr assessmentofsurgicalproceduraltimepediclescrewaccuracyandclinicianradiationexposureofanovelroboticnavigationsystemcomparedwithconventionalopenandpercutaneousfreehandtechniquesacadavericinvestigation AT harrisjonathana assessmentofsurgicalproceduraltimepediclescrewaccuracyandclinicianradiationexposureofanovelroboticnavigationsystemcomparedwithconventionalopenandpercutaneousfreehandtechniquesacadavericinvestigation AT hussainmirm assessmentofsurgicalproceduraltimepediclescrewaccuracyandclinicianradiationexposureofanovelroboticnavigationsystemcomparedwithconventionalopenandpercutaneousfreehandtechniquesacadavericinvestigation AT wadhwarishi assessmentofsurgicalproceduraltimepediclescrewaccuracyandclinicianradiationexposureofanovelroboticnavigationsystemcomparedwithconventionalopenandpercutaneousfreehandtechniquesacadavericinvestigation AT changvictorw assessmentofsurgicalproceduraltimepediclescrewaccuracyandclinicianradiationexposureofanovelroboticnavigationsystemcomparedwithconventionalopenandpercutaneousfreehandtechniquesacadavericinvestigation AT schroerluckesamuelr assessmentofsurgicalproceduraltimepediclescrewaccuracyandclinicianradiationexposureofanovelroboticnavigationsystemcomparedwithconventionalopenandpercutaneousfreehandtechniquesacadavericinvestigation AT samorawalterp assessmentofsurgicalproceduraltimepediclescrewaccuracyandclinicianradiationexposureofanovelroboticnavigationsystemcomparedwithconventionalopenandpercutaneousfreehandtechniquesacadavericinvestigation AT passiaspeterg assessmentofsurgicalproceduraltimepediclescrewaccuracyandclinicianradiationexposureofanovelroboticnavigationsystemcomparedwithconventionalopenandpercutaneousfreehandtechniquesacadavericinvestigation AT patelrakeshd assessmentofsurgicalproceduraltimepediclescrewaccuracyandclinicianradiationexposureofanovelroboticnavigationsystemcomparedwithconventionalopenandpercutaneousfreehandtechniquesacadavericinvestigation AT panchalripulr assessmentofsurgicalproceduraltimepediclescrewaccuracyandclinicianradiationexposureofanovelroboticnavigationsystemcomparedwithconventionalopenandpercutaneousfreehandtechniquesacadavericinvestigation AT dagostinosabino assessmentofsurgicalproceduraltimepediclescrewaccuracyandclinicianradiationexposureofanovelroboticnavigationsystemcomparedwithconventionalopenandpercutaneousfreehandtechniquesacadavericinvestigation AT whitneynathaniell assessmentofsurgicalproceduraltimepediclescrewaccuracyandclinicianradiationexposureofanovelroboticnavigationsystemcomparedwithconventionalopenandpercutaneousfreehandtechniquesacadavericinvestigation AT crawfordneilr assessmentofsurgicalproceduraltimepediclescrewaccuracyandclinicianradiationexposureofanovelroboticnavigationsystemcomparedwithconventionalopenandpercutaneousfreehandtechniquesacadavericinvestigation AT bucklenbrandons assessmentofsurgicalproceduraltimepediclescrewaccuracyandclinicianradiationexposureofanovelroboticnavigationsystemcomparedwithconventionalopenandpercutaneousfreehandtechniquesacadavericinvestigation |