Cargando…

Does Size Matter? An Analysis of the Effect of Lumbar Disc Herniation Size on the Success of Nonoperative Treatment

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we examined whether the size of a lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is predictive of the need for surgical intervention within 2 years after obtaining an initial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. We hypothesized that a fragment that occupi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Anmol, Upadhyaya, Shivam, Yeung, Caleb M., Ostergaard, Peter J., Fogel, Harold A., Cha, Thomas, Schwab, Joseph, Bono, Chris, Hershman, Stuart
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7485083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32905720
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568219880822
_version_ 1783581089251459072
author Gupta, Anmol
Upadhyaya, Shivam
Yeung, Caleb M.
Ostergaard, Peter J.
Fogel, Harold A.
Cha, Thomas
Schwab, Joseph
Bono, Chris
Hershman, Stuart
author_facet Gupta, Anmol
Upadhyaya, Shivam
Yeung, Caleb M.
Ostergaard, Peter J.
Fogel, Harold A.
Cha, Thomas
Schwab, Joseph
Bono, Chris
Hershman, Stuart
author_sort Gupta, Anmol
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we examined whether the size of a lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is predictive of the need for surgical intervention within 2 years after obtaining an initial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. We hypothesized that a fragment that occupied a larger percentage of the spinal canal would not predict which patients failed conservative management. METHODS: Using the ICD-10 code M51.26, we identified patients at a single academic institution, across the 2-year period from 2015 to 2016, who received a diagnosis of primary lumbar radicular pain, had MRI showing a disc herniation, and underwent at least 6 weeks of nonoperative management. Patients experiencing symptoms suggesting cauda equina syndrome and those with progressive motor neurological deficits were excluded from analysis, as were patients exhibiting “hard” disc herniations. Within the axial view of an MRI, the following measurements were made on AGFA-IMPACS for a given disc herniation: the length of both the canal and the herniated disc along the anterior-posterior axis, the average width of the disc within the canal; the total canal area, and the area of the disc herniation. Data analysis was conducted in SPSS and a 2-tailed reliability analysis using Cronbach’s alpha as a measure of reliability was obtained. RESULTS: A total of 368 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria for this study. Of these, 14 (3.8%) had L3-L4 herniations, 185 had L4-L5 herniations (50.3%), and 169 had L5-S1 herniations (45.9%). Overall, 336 (91.3%) patients did not undergo surgery within 1 year of the LDH diagnosis. Patients who did not receive surgery had an average herniation size that occupied 31.2% of the canal, whereas patients who received surgery had disc herniations that occupied 31.5% of the canal on average. A Cronbach’s alpha of .992 was observed overall across interobserver measurements. After controlling for age, race, gender, and location of herniation through a logistic regression, it was found that the size of the herniation and the percentage of the canal that was occupied had no predictive value with regard to failure of conservative management, generating an odds ratio for surgery of 1.00. CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of the spinal canal occupied by a herniated disc does not predict which patients will fail nonoperative treatment and require surgery within 2 years after undergoing a lumbar spine MRI scan.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7485083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74850832020-09-17 Does Size Matter? An Analysis of the Effect of Lumbar Disc Herniation Size on the Success of Nonoperative Treatment Gupta, Anmol Upadhyaya, Shivam Yeung, Caleb M. Ostergaard, Peter J. Fogel, Harold A. Cha, Thomas Schwab, Joseph Bono, Chris Hershman, Stuart Global Spine J Original Articles STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we examined whether the size of a lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is predictive of the need for surgical intervention within 2 years after obtaining an initial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. We hypothesized that a fragment that occupied a larger percentage of the spinal canal would not predict which patients failed conservative management. METHODS: Using the ICD-10 code M51.26, we identified patients at a single academic institution, across the 2-year period from 2015 to 2016, who received a diagnosis of primary lumbar radicular pain, had MRI showing a disc herniation, and underwent at least 6 weeks of nonoperative management. Patients experiencing symptoms suggesting cauda equina syndrome and those with progressive motor neurological deficits were excluded from analysis, as were patients exhibiting “hard” disc herniations. Within the axial view of an MRI, the following measurements were made on AGFA-IMPACS for a given disc herniation: the length of both the canal and the herniated disc along the anterior-posterior axis, the average width of the disc within the canal; the total canal area, and the area of the disc herniation. Data analysis was conducted in SPSS and a 2-tailed reliability analysis using Cronbach’s alpha as a measure of reliability was obtained. RESULTS: A total of 368 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria for this study. Of these, 14 (3.8%) had L3-L4 herniations, 185 had L4-L5 herniations (50.3%), and 169 had L5-S1 herniations (45.9%). Overall, 336 (91.3%) patients did not undergo surgery within 1 year of the LDH diagnosis. Patients who did not receive surgery had an average herniation size that occupied 31.2% of the canal, whereas patients who received surgery had disc herniations that occupied 31.5% of the canal on average. A Cronbach’s alpha of .992 was observed overall across interobserver measurements. After controlling for age, race, gender, and location of herniation through a logistic regression, it was found that the size of the herniation and the percentage of the canal that was occupied had no predictive value with regard to failure of conservative management, generating an odds ratio for surgery of 1.00. CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of the spinal canal occupied by a herniated disc does not predict which patients will fail nonoperative treatment and require surgery within 2 years after undergoing a lumbar spine MRI scan. SAGE Publications 2019-10-10 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7485083/ /pubmed/32905720 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568219880822 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Gupta, Anmol
Upadhyaya, Shivam
Yeung, Caleb M.
Ostergaard, Peter J.
Fogel, Harold A.
Cha, Thomas
Schwab, Joseph
Bono, Chris
Hershman, Stuart
Does Size Matter? An Analysis of the Effect of Lumbar Disc Herniation Size on the Success of Nonoperative Treatment
title Does Size Matter? An Analysis of the Effect of Lumbar Disc Herniation Size on the Success of Nonoperative Treatment
title_full Does Size Matter? An Analysis of the Effect of Lumbar Disc Herniation Size on the Success of Nonoperative Treatment
title_fullStr Does Size Matter? An Analysis of the Effect of Lumbar Disc Herniation Size on the Success of Nonoperative Treatment
title_full_unstemmed Does Size Matter? An Analysis of the Effect of Lumbar Disc Herniation Size on the Success of Nonoperative Treatment
title_short Does Size Matter? An Analysis of the Effect of Lumbar Disc Herniation Size on the Success of Nonoperative Treatment
title_sort does size matter? an analysis of the effect of lumbar disc herniation size on the success of nonoperative treatment
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7485083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32905720
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568219880822
work_keys_str_mv AT guptaanmol doessizematterananalysisoftheeffectoflumbardischerniationsizeonthesuccessofnonoperativetreatment
AT upadhyayashivam doessizematterananalysisoftheeffectoflumbardischerniationsizeonthesuccessofnonoperativetreatment
AT yeungcalebm doessizematterananalysisoftheeffectoflumbardischerniationsizeonthesuccessofnonoperativetreatment
AT ostergaardpeterj doessizematterananalysisoftheeffectoflumbardischerniationsizeonthesuccessofnonoperativetreatment
AT fogelharolda doessizematterananalysisoftheeffectoflumbardischerniationsizeonthesuccessofnonoperativetreatment
AT chathomas doessizematterananalysisoftheeffectoflumbardischerniationsizeonthesuccessofnonoperativetreatment
AT schwabjoseph doessizematterananalysisoftheeffectoflumbardischerniationsizeonthesuccessofnonoperativetreatment
AT bonochris doessizematterananalysisoftheeffectoflumbardischerniationsizeonthesuccessofnonoperativetreatment
AT hershmanstuart doessizematterananalysisoftheeffectoflumbardischerniationsizeonthesuccessofnonoperativetreatment