Cargando…

Prevalence, determinants and knowledge about herbal medicine and non-hospital utilisation in southwest Nigeria: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES: To examine the prevalence, determinants, safety perceptions, effectiveness and knowledge of herbal medicines (HMs) and reasons for non-hospital utilisation. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Ekiti state, southwest Nigeria. PARTICIPANTS: A representative sample (n=1600) of adults (1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aina, Olujimi, Gautam, Lata, Simkhada, Padam, Hall, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7485235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32912997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040769
_version_ 1783581115730100224
author Aina, Olujimi
Gautam, Lata
Simkhada, Padam
Hall, Sarah
author_facet Aina, Olujimi
Gautam, Lata
Simkhada, Padam
Hall, Sarah
author_sort Aina, Olujimi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To examine the prevalence, determinants, safety perceptions, effectiveness and knowledge of herbal medicines (HMs) and reasons for non-hospital utilisation. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Ekiti state, southwest Nigeria. PARTICIPANTS: A representative sample (n=1600) of adults (18 years or above) currently living in Ekiti state, southwest Nigeria for at least 2 years, at the time of study. RESULTS: The majority of the respondents (85% n=1265) have used HMs in the last 2 years. Across economic classes use, middle income (88.3%) was the highest (p<0.001), suggesting poverty is not a major factor, even with income inequality. Their use was the most common among respondents with a primary level of education (91.4%, p=0.001); and 100% use (p=0.009) of respondents practising African traditional religion; farmers and those 70 years or above. Our study also reveals more men (p<0.001) used HMs (89.9%) than women (78.6%) and effectiveness was a major reason for use (39.6%) followed by affordability (31.9%). Although the majority of the respondents (90%) knew the difference between certified and uncertified HMs, uncertified ones were the most commonly used (37.3%) in the population. CONCLUSION: Although there is a cultural history of HM use within the study population, the choice of use was based on their effectiveness. Therefore, a scientifically valid analysis of this claim within the study population may help achieve a cheaper and affordable healthcare alternative which will be safe. This is important, considering that uncertified HMs were chosen over certified ones, even though a large majority of respondents were aware of differences and likely consequences. This study highlights the need for further investment by the government, individuals and corporate stakeholders in HM research and improvement of conventional healthcare system. This is in addition to public health awareness on the danger of use of uncertified herbal products.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7485235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74852352020-09-18 Prevalence, determinants and knowledge about herbal medicine and non-hospital utilisation in southwest Nigeria: a cross-sectional study Aina, Olujimi Gautam, Lata Simkhada, Padam Hall, Sarah BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: To examine the prevalence, determinants, safety perceptions, effectiveness and knowledge of herbal medicines (HMs) and reasons for non-hospital utilisation. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Ekiti state, southwest Nigeria. PARTICIPANTS: A representative sample (n=1600) of adults (18 years or above) currently living in Ekiti state, southwest Nigeria for at least 2 years, at the time of study. RESULTS: The majority of the respondents (85% n=1265) have used HMs in the last 2 years. Across economic classes use, middle income (88.3%) was the highest (p<0.001), suggesting poverty is not a major factor, even with income inequality. Their use was the most common among respondents with a primary level of education (91.4%, p=0.001); and 100% use (p=0.009) of respondents practising African traditional religion; farmers and those 70 years or above. Our study also reveals more men (p<0.001) used HMs (89.9%) than women (78.6%) and effectiveness was a major reason for use (39.6%) followed by affordability (31.9%). Although the majority of the respondents (90%) knew the difference between certified and uncertified HMs, uncertified ones were the most commonly used (37.3%) in the population. CONCLUSION: Although there is a cultural history of HM use within the study population, the choice of use was based on their effectiveness. Therefore, a scientifically valid analysis of this claim within the study population may help achieve a cheaper and affordable healthcare alternative which will be safe. This is important, considering that uncertified HMs were chosen over certified ones, even though a large majority of respondents were aware of differences and likely consequences. This study highlights the need for further investment by the government, individuals and corporate stakeholders in HM research and improvement of conventional healthcare system. This is in addition to public health awareness on the danger of use of uncertified herbal products. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7485235/ /pubmed/32912997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040769 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Public Health
Aina, Olujimi
Gautam, Lata
Simkhada, Padam
Hall, Sarah
Prevalence, determinants and knowledge about herbal medicine and non-hospital utilisation in southwest Nigeria: a cross-sectional study
title Prevalence, determinants and knowledge about herbal medicine and non-hospital utilisation in southwest Nigeria: a cross-sectional study
title_full Prevalence, determinants and knowledge about herbal medicine and non-hospital utilisation in southwest Nigeria: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Prevalence, determinants and knowledge about herbal medicine and non-hospital utilisation in southwest Nigeria: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence, determinants and knowledge about herbal medicine and non-hospital utilisation in southwest Nigeria: a cross-sectional study
title_short Prevalence, determinants and knowledge about herbal medicine and non-hospital utilisation in southwest Nigeria: a cross-sectional study
title_sort prevalence, determinants and knowledge about herbal medicine and non-hospital utilisation in southwest nigeria: a cross-sectional study
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7485235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32912997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040769
work_keys_str_mv AT ainaolujimi prevalencedeterminantsandknowledgeaboutherbalmedicineandnonhospitalutilisationinsouthwestnigeriaacrosssectionalstudy
AT gautamlata prevalencedeterminantsandknowledgeaboutherbalmedicineandnonhospitalutilisationinsouthwestnigeriaacrosssectionalstudy
AT simkhadapadam prevalencedeterminantsandknowledgeaboutherbalmedicineandnonhospitalutilisationinsouthwestnigeriaacrosssectionalstudy
AT hallsarah prevalencedeterminantsandknowledgeaboutherbalmedicineandnonhospitalutilisationinsouthwestnigeriaacrosssectionalstudy