Cargando…

Randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of local oestrogen treatment in postmenopausal women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery (LOTUS): a pilot study to assess feasibility of a large multicentre trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing oestrogen treatment with no oestrogen supplementation in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery. DESIGN AND SETTING: A randomised, parallel, open, external pilot trial involving six UK u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verghese, Tina Sara, Middleton, Lee, Cheed, Versha, Leighton, Lisa, Daniels, Jane, Latthe, Pallavi Manish
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7485245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32912971
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025141
_version_ 1783581118083104768
author Verghese, Tina Sara
Middleton, Lee
Cheed, Versha
Leighton, Lisa
Daniels, Jane
Latthe, Pallavi Manish
author_facet Verghese, Tina Sara
Middleton, Lee
Cheed, Versha
Leighton, Lisa
Daniels, Jane
Latthe, Pallavi Manish
author_sort Verghese, Tina Sara
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing oestrogen treatment with no oestrogen supplementation in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery. DESIGN AND SETTING: A randomised, parallel, open, external pilot trial involving six UK urogynaecology centres (July 2015–August 2016). PARTICIPANTS: Postmenopausal women with POP opting for surgery, unless involving mesh or for recurrent POP in same compartment. INTERVENTION: Women were randomised (1:1) to preoperative and postoperative oestrogen or no treatment. Oestrogen treatment (oestradiol hemihydrate 10 μg vaginal pessaries) commenced 6 weeks prior to surgery (once daily for 2 weeks, twice weekly for 4 weeks) and twice weekly for 26 weeks from 6 weeks postsurgery. OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcomes were assessment of eligibility and recruitment rates along with compliance and data completion. To obtain estimates for important aspects of the protocol to allow development of a definitive trial. RESULTS: 325 women seeking POP surgery were screened over 13 months and 157 (48%) were eligible. Of these, 100 (64%) were randomised, 50 to oestrogen and 50 to no oestrogen treatment, with 89 (44/45 respectively) ultimately having surgery. Of these, 89% (79/89) returned complete questionnaires at 6 months and 78% (32/41) reported good compliance with oestrogen. No serious adverse events were attributable to oestrogen use. CONCLUSIONS: A large multicentre RCT of oestrogen versus no treatment is feasible, as it is possible to randomise and follow up participants with high fidelity. Four predefined feasibility criteria were met. Compliance with treatment regimens is not a barrier. A larger trial is required to definitively address the role of perioperative oestrogen supplementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN46661996.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7485245
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74852452020-09-18 Randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of local oestrogen treatment in postmenopausal women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery (LOTUS): a pilot study to assess feasibility of a large multicentre trial Verghese, Tina Sara Middleton, Lee Cheed, Versha Leighton, Lisa Daniels, Jane Latthe, Pallavi Manish BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing oestrogen treatment with no oestrogen supplementation in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery. DESIGN AND SETTING: A randomised, parallel, open, external pilot trial involving six UK urogynaecology centres (July 2015–August 2016). PARTICIPANTS: Postmenopausal women with POP opting for surgery, unless involving mesh or for recurrent POP in same compartment. INTERVENTION: Women were randomised (1:1) to preoperative and postoperative oestrogen or no treatment. Oestrogen treatment (oestradiol hemihydrate 10 μg vaginal pessaries) commenced 6 weeks prior to surgery (once daily for 2 weeks, twice weekly for 4 weeks) and twice weekly for 26 weeks from 6 weeks postsurgery. OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcomes were assessment of eligibility and recruitment rates along with compliance and data completion. To obtain estimates for important aspects of the protocol to allow development of a definitive trial. RESULTS: 325 women seeking POP surgery were screened over 13 months and 157 (48%) were eligible. Of these, 100 (64%) were randomised, 50 to oestrogen and 50 to no oestrogen treatment, with 89 (44/45 respectively) ultimately having surgery. Of these, 89% (79/89) returned complete questionnaires at 6 months and 78% (32/41) reported good compliance with oestrogen. No serious adverse events were attributable to oestrogen use. CONCLUSIONS: A large multicentre RCT of oestrogen versus no treatment is feasible, as it is possible to randomise and follow up participants with high fidelity. Four predefined feasibility criteria were met. Compliance with treatment regimens is not a barrier. A larger trial is required to definitively address the role of perioperative oestrogen supplementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN46661996. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7485245/ /pubmed/32912971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025141 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Verghese, Tina Sara
Middleton, Lee
Cheed, Versha
Leighton, Lisa
Daniels, Jane
Latthe, Pallavi Manish
Randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of local oestrogen treatment in postmenopausal women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery (LOTUS): a pilot study to assess feasibility of a large multicentre trial
title Randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of local oestrogen treatment in postmenopausal women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery (LOTUS): a pilot study to assess feasibility of a large multicentre trial
title_full Randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of local oestrogen treatment in postmenopausal women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery (LOTUS): a pilot study to assess feasibility of a large multicentre trial
title_fullStr Randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of local oestrogen treatment in postmenopausal women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery (LOTUS): a pilot study to assess feasibility of a large multicentre trial
title_full_unstemmed Randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of local oestrogen treatment in postmenopausal women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery (LOTUS): a pilot study to assess feasibility of a large multicentre trial
title_short Randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of local oestrogen treatment in postmenopausal women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery (LOTUS): a pilot study to assess feasibility of a large multicentre trial
title_sort randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of local oestrogen treatment in postmenopausal women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery (lotus): a pilot study to assess feasibility of a large multicentre trial
topic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7485245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32912971
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025141
work_keys_str_mv AT verghesetinasara randomisedcontrolledtrialtoinvestigatetheeffectivenessoflocaloestrogentreatmentinpostmenopausalwomenundergoingpelvicorganprolapsesurgerylotusapilotstudytoassessfeasibilityofalargemulticentretrial
AT middletonlee randomisedcontrolledtrialtoinvestigatetheeffectivenessoflocaloestrogentreatmentinpostmenopausalwomenundergoingpelvicorganprolapsesurgerylotusapilotstudytoassessfeasibilityofalargemulticentretrial
AT cheedversha randomisedcontrolledtrialtoinvestigatetheeffectivenessoflocaloestrogentreatmentinpostmenopausalwomenundergoingpelvicorganprolapsesurgerylotusapilotstudytoassessfeasibilityofalargemulticentretrial
AT leightonlisa randomisedcontrolledtrialtoinvestigatetheeffectivenessoflocaloestrogentreatmentinpostmenopausalwomenundergoingpelvicorganprolapsesurgerylotusapilotstudytoassessfeasibilityofalargemulticentretrial
AT danielsjane randomisedcontrolledtrialtoinvestigatetheeffectivenessoflocaloestrogentreatmentinpostmenopausalwomenundergoingpelvicorganprolapsesurgerylotusapilotstudytoassessfeasibilityofalargemulticentretrial
AT latthepallavimanish randomisedcontrolledtrialtoinvestigatetheeffectivenessoflocaloestrogentreatmentinpostmenopausalwomenundergoingpelvicorganprolapsesurgerylotusapilotstudytoassessfeasibilityofalargemulticentretrial
AT randomisedcontrolledtrialtoinvestigatetheeffectivenessoflocaloestrogentreatmentinpostmenopausalwomenundergoingpelvicorganprolapsesurgerylotusapilotstudytoassessfeasibilityofalargemulticentretrial