Cargando…

No Effects of Cognitive Remediation on Cerebral White Matter in Individuals at Ultra-High Risk for Psychosis—A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND: Individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis (UHR) present with subtle alterations in cerebral white matter (WM), which appear to be associated with clinical and functional outcome. The effect of cognitive remediation on WM organization in UHR individuals has not been investigated previo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kristensen, Tina D., Ebdrup, Bjørn H., Hjorthøj, Carsten, Mandl, René C. W., Raghava, Jayachandra M., Jepsen, Jens Richardt M., Fagerlund, Birgitte, Glenthøj, Louise B., Wenneberg, Christina, Krakauer, Kristine, Pantelis, Christos, Glenthøj, Birte Y., Nordentoft, Merete
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7485415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33005161
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00873
_version_ 1783581144036409344
author Kristensen, Tina D.
Ebdrup, Bjørn H.
Hjorthøj, Carsten
Mandl, René C. W.
Raghava, Jayachandra M.
Jepsen, Jens Richardt M.
Fagerlund, Birgitte
Glenthøj, Louise B.
Wenneberg, Christina
Krakauer, Kristine
Pantelis, Christos
Glenthøj, Birte Y.
Nordentoft, Merete
author_facet Kristensen, Tina D.
Ebdrup, Bjørn H.
Hjorthøj, Carsten
Mandl, René C. W.
Raghava, Jayachandra M.
Jepsen, Jens Richardt M.
Fagerlund, Birgitte
Glenthøj, Louise B.
Wenneberg, Christina
Krakauer, Kristine
Pantelis, Christos
Glenthøj, Birte Y.
Nordentoft, Merete
author_sort Kristensen, Tina D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis (UHR) present with subtle alterations in cerebral white matter (WM), which appear to be associated with clinical and functional outcome. The effect of cognitive remediation on WM organization in UHR individuals has not been investigated previously. METHODS: In a randomized, clinical trial, UHR individuals aged 18 to 40 years were assigned to treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU plus cognitive remediation for 20 weeks. Cognitive remediation comprised 20 x 2-h sessions of neurocognitive and social-cognitive training. Primary outcome was whole brain fractional anisotropy derived from diffusion weighted imaging, statistically tested as an interaction between timepoint and treatment group. Secondary outcomes were restricted to five predefined region of interest (ROI) analyses on fractional anisotropy, axial diffusivity, radial diffusivity and mean diffusivity. For significant timepoint and treatment group interactions within these five ROIs, we explored associations between longitudinal changes in WM and cognitive functions/clinical symptoms. Finally, we explored dose-response effects of cognitive remediation on WM. RESULTS: A total of 111 UHR individuals were included. Attrition-rate was 26%. The cognitive remediation group completed on average 12 h of neurocognitive training, which was considerably lower than per protocol. We found no effect of cognitive remediation on whole-brain FA when compared to treatment as usual. Secondary ROI analyses revealed a nominal significant interaction between timepoint*treatment of AD in left medial lemniscus (P=0.016) which did not survive control for multiple comparisons. The exploratory test showed that this change in AD correlated to improvements of mental flexibility in the cognitive remediation group (p=0.001). We found no dose-response effect of neurocognitive training on WM. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive remediation comprising 12 h of neurocognitive training on average did not improve global or regional WM organization in UHR individuals. Further investigations of duration and intensity of cognitive training as necessary prerequisites of neuroplasticity-based changes are warranted. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02098408.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7485415
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74854152020-09-30 No Effects of Cognitive Remediation on Cerebral White Matter in Individuals at Ultra-High Risk for Psychosis—A Randomized Clinical Trial Kristensen, Tina D. Ebdrup, Bjørn H. Hjorthøj, Carsten Mandl, René C. W. Raghava, Jayachandra M. Jepsen, Jens Richardt M. Fagerlund, Birgitte Glenthøj, Louise B. Wenneberg, Christina Krakauer, Kristine Pantelis, Christos Glenthøj, Birte Y. Nordentoft, Merete Front Psychiatry Psychiatry BACKGROUND: Individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis (UHR) present with subtle alterations in cerebral white matter (WM), which appear to be associated with clinical and functional outcome. The effect of cognitive remediation on WM organization in UHR individuals has not been investigated previously. METHODS: In a randomized, clinical trial, UHR individuals aged 18 to 40 years were assigned to treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU plus cognitive remediation for 20 weeks. Cognitive remediation comprised 20 x 2-h sessions of neurocognitive and social-cognitive training. Primary outcome was whole brain fractional anisotropy derived from diffusion weighted imaging, statistically tested as an interaction between timepoint and treatment group. Secondary outcomes were restricted to five predefined region of interest (ROI) analyses on fractional anisotropy, axial diffusivity, radial diffusivity and mean diffusivity. For significant timepoint and treatment group interactions within these five ROIs, we explored associations between longitudinal changes in WM and cognitive functions/clinical symptoms. Finally, we explored dose-response effects of cognitive remediation on WM. RESULTS: A total of 111 UHR individuals were included. Attrition-rate was 26%. The cognitive remediation group completed on average 12 h of neurocognitive training, which was considerably lower than per protocol. We found no effect of cognitive remediation on whole-brain FA when compared to treatment as usual. Secondary ROI analyses revealed a nominal significant interaction between timepoint*treatment of AD in left medial lemniscus (P=0.016) which did not survive control for multiple comparisons. The exploratory test showed that this change in AD correlated to improvements of mental flexibility in the cognitive remediation group (p=0.001). We found no dose-response effect of neurocognitive training on WM. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive remediation comprising 12 h of neurocognitive training on average did not improve global or regional WM organization in UHR individuals. Further investigations of duration and intensity of cognitive training as necessary prerequisites of neuroplasticity-based changes are warranted. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02098408. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7485415/ /pubmed/33005161 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00873 Text en Copyright © 2020 Kristensen, Ebdrup, Hjorthøj, Mandl, Raghava, Jepsen, Fagerlund, Glenthøj, Wenneberg, Krakauer, Pantelis, Glenthøj and Nordentoft http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Kristensen, Tina D.
Ebdrup, Bjørn H.
Hjorthøj, Carsten
Mandl, René C. W.
Raghava, Jayachandra M.
Jepsen, Jens Richardt M.
Fagerlund, Birgitte
Glenthøj, Louise B.
Wenneberg, Christina
Krakauer, Kristine
Pantelis, Christos
Glenthøj, Birte Y.
Nordentoft, Merete
No Effects of Cognitive Remediation on Cerebral White Matter in Individuals at Ultra-High Risk for Psychosis—A Randomized Clinical Trial
title No Effects of Cognitive Remediation on Cerebral White Matter in Individuals at Ultra-High Risk for Psychosis—A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full No Effects of Cognitive Remediation on Cerebral White Matter in Individuals at Ultra-High Risk for Psychosis—A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr No Effects of Cognitive Remediation on Cerebral White Matter in Individuals at Ultra-High Risk for Psychosis—A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed No Effects of Cognitive Remediation on Cerebral White Matter in Individuals at Ultra-High Risk for Psychosis—A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short No Effects of Cognitive Remediation on Cerebral White Matter in Individuals at Ultra-High Risk for Psychosis—A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort no effects of cognitive remediation on cerebral white matter in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis—a randomized clinical trial
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7485415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33005161
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00873
work_keys_str_mv AT kristensentinad noeffectsofcognitiveremediationoncerebralwhitematterinindividualsatultrahighriskforpsychosisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT ebdrupbjørnh noeffectsofcognitiveremediationoncerebralwhitematterinindividualsatultrahighriskforpsychosisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT hjorthøjcarsten noeffectsofcognitiveremediationoncerebralwhitematterinindividualsatultrahighriskforpsychosisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT mandlrenecw noeffectsofcognitiveremediationoncerebralwhitematterinindividualsatultrahighriskforpsychosisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT raghavajayachandram noeffectsofcognitiveremediationoncerebralwhitematterinindividualsatultrahighriskforpsychosisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT jepsenjensrichardtm noeffectsofcognitiveremediationoncerebralwhitematterinindividualsatultrahighriskforpsychosisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT fagerlundbirgitte noeffectsofcognitiveremediationoncerebralwhitematterinindividualsatultrahighriskforpsychosisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT glenthøjlouiseb noeffectsofcognitiveremediationoncerebralwhitematterinindividualsatultrahighriskforpsychosisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT wennebergchristina noeffectsofcognitiveremediationoncerebralwhitematterinindividualsatultrahighriskforpsychosisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT krakauerkristine noeffectsofcognitiveremediationoncerebralwhitematterinindividualsatultrahighriskforpsychosisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT pantelischristos noeffectsofcognitiveremediationoncerebralwhitematterinindividualsatultrahighriskforpsychosisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT glenthøjbirtey noeffectsofcognitiveremediationoncerebralwhitematterinindividualsatultrahighriskforpsychosisarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT nordentoftmerete noeffectsofcognitiveremediationoncerebralwhitematterinindividualsatultrahighriskforpsychosisarandomizedclinicaltrial