Cargando…

Transoral Laser Microsurgery (TLM) for Glottic Cancer: Prospective Assessment of a New Pathology Workup Protocol

Background/Purpose: The value of margin status after TLM for glottic cancer is debatable, due to difficulties in specimen orientation and margin analysis. Purpose of this study was the prospective evaluation of feasibility of a new standardized technique of oriented fixation of the TLM specimen and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meulemans, Jeroen, Hauben, Esther, Peeperkorn, Samuel, Nuyts, Sandra, Delaere, Pierre, Vander Poorten, Vincent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7485552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33005622
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2020.00056
_version_ 1783581173152219136
author Meulemans, Jeroen
Hauben, Esther
Peeperkorn, Samuel
Nuyts, Sandra
Delaere, Pierre
Vander Poorten, Vincent
author_facet Meulemans, Jeroen
Hauben, Esther
Peeperkorn, Samuel
Nuyts, Sandra
Delaere, Pierre
Vander Poorten, Vincent
author_sort Meulemans, Jeroen
collection PubMed
description Background/Purpose: The value of margin status after TLM for glottic cancer is debatable, due to difficulties in specimen orientation and margin analysis. Purpose of this study was the prospective evaluation of feasibility of a new standardized technique of oriented fixation of the TLM specimen and identification of the added value on tissue processing and margin status reporting. Methods: Patients with suspicious glottic lesions undergoing TLM were included. After resection, the specimen margins were inked in the OR using different colors. Subsequently, the specimens were fixed on a pig liver carrier and sent for further processing, accompanied with photographs of the larynx pre-TLM and of the mounted specimen. Feasibility was assessed by registration of duration of specimen preparation in the OR and the lab and by procedure-specific questionnaires. Objective evaluation included assessment of margin status and proportion of evaluable margins. Chi square tests were used to make comparisons of proportions. Results: One hundred and four consecutive patients were included between May 2016 and September 2019. TLM was performed in a primary and salvage setting in 89.4 and 10.6% of patients, respectively. Mean duration of intraoperative specimen preparation was 5.1 min (SD 2.6 min). No difficulties in orientation nor fixation during intraoperative preparation were reported in 87.5 and 88.2%, respectively. Specimen orientation was judged by the pathologist as very adequate in 89.4%, with the accompanying photographs considered helpful for orientation and processing in 84.6%. Substantial difficulties in further lab processing and pathologic examination were identified in 17.7%. Deep margin evaluability was very high (98.0%) and significantly higher than the evaluability of superficial mucosal margins. Compared to our previous series published by our group (n = 142), deep margin evaluability significantly rose from 62.7 to 98.0% (p < 0.001) and true positive rate of the deep margins increased from 0 to 44.4% (p = 0.002). Discussion/Conclusion: The new and standardized technique of oriented fixation of TLM specimens on a pig liver carrier proves feasible both in the OR and lab setting and results in high margin evaluability rates, especially for the deep margin, as well as a decreased rate of false positive deep margins when compared to a historical TLM cohort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7485552
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74855522020-09-30 Transoral Laser Microsurgery (TLM) for Glottic Cancer: Prospective Assessment of a New Pathology Workup Protocol Meulemans, Jeroen Hauben, Esther Peeperkorn, Samuel Nuyts, Sandra Delaere, Pierre Vander Poorten, Vincent Front Surg Surgery Background/Purpose: The value of margin status after TLM for glottic cancer is debatable, due to difficulties in specimen orientation and margin analysis. Purpose of this study was the prospective evaluation of feasibility of a new standardized technique of oriented fixation of the TLM specimen and identification of the added value on tissue processing and margin status reporting. Methods: Patients with suspicious glottic lesions undergoing TLM were included. After resection, the specimen margins were inked in the OR using different colors. Subsequently, the specimens were fixed on a pig liver carrier and sent for further processing, accompanied with photographs of the larynx pre-TLM and of the mounted specimen. Feasibility was assessed by registration of duration of specimen preparation in the OR and the lab and by procedure-specific questionnaires. Objective evaluation included assessment of margin status and proportion of evaluable margins. Chi square tests were used to make comparisons of proportions. Results: One hundred and four consecutive patients were included between May 2016 and September 2019. TLM was performed in a primary and salvage setting in 89.4 and 10.6% of patients, respectively. Mean duration of intraoperative specimen preparation was 5.1 min (SD 2.6 min). No difficulties in orientation nor fixation during intraoperative preparation were reported in 87.5 and 88.2%, respectively. Specimen orientation was judged by the pathologist as very adequate in 89.4%, with the accompanying photographs considered helpful for orientation and processing in 84.6%. Substantial difficulties in further lab processing and pathologic examination were identified in 17.7%. Deep margin evaluability was very high (98.0%) and significantly higher than the evaluability of superficial mucosal margins. Compared to our previous series published by our group (n = 142), deep margin evaluability significantly rose from 62.7 to 98.0% (p < 0.001) and true positive rate of the deep margins increased from 0 to 44.4% (p = 0.002). Discussion/Conclusion: The new and standardized technique of oriented fixation of TLM specimens on a pig liver carrier proves feasible both in the OR and lab setting and results in high margin evaluability rates, especially for the deep margin, as well as a decreased rate of false positive deep margins when compared to a historical TLM cohort. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7485552/ /pubmed/33005622 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2020.00056 Text en Copyright © 2020 Meulemans, Hauben, Peeperkorn, Nuyts, Delaere and Vander Poorten. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Meulemans, Jeroen
Hauben, Esther
Peeperkorn, Samuel
Nuyts, Sandra
Delaere, Pierre
Vander Poorten, Vincent
Transoral Laser Microsurgery (TLM) for Glottic Cancer: Prospective Assessment of a New Pathology Workup Protocol
title Transoral Laser Microsurgery (TLM) for Glottic Cancer: Prospective Assessment of a New Pathology Workup Protocol
title_full Transoral Laser Microsurgery (TLM) for Glottic Cancer: Prospective Assessment of a New Pathology Workup Protocol
title_fullStr Transoral Laser Microsurgery (TLM) for Glottic Cancer: Prospective Assessment of a New Pathology Workup Protocol
title_full_unstemmed Transoral Laser Microsurgery (TLM) for Glottic Cancer: Prospective Assessment of a New Pathology Workup Protocol
title_short Transoral Laser Microsurgery (TLM) for Glottic Cancer: Prospective Assessment of a New Pathology Workup Protocol
title_sort transoral laser microsurgery (tlm) for glottic cancer: prospective assessment of a new pathology workup protocol
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7485552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33005622
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2020.00056
work_keys_str_mv AT meulemansjeroen transorallasermicrosurgerytlmforglotticcancerprospectiveassessmentofanewpathologyworkupprotocol
AT haubenesther transorallasermicrosurgerytlmforglotticcancerprospectiveassessmentofanewpathologyworkupprotocol
AT peeperkornsamuel transorallasermicrosurgerytlmforglotticcancerprospectiveassessmentofanewpathologyworkupprotocol
AT nuytssandra transorallasermicrosurgerytlmforglotticcancerprospectiveassessmentofanewpathologyworkupprotocol
AT delaerepierre transorallasermicrosurgerytlmforglotticcancerprospectiveassessmentofanewpathologyworkupprotocol
AT vanderpoortenvincent transorallasermicrosurgerytlmforglotticcancerprospectiveassessmentofanewpathologyworkupprotocol