Cargando…
Central Venous Pressure and Clinical Outcomes During Left-Sided Mechanical Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock
Background: Right ventricular failure (RVF) is associated with increased mortality among patients receiving left ventricular mechanical circulatory support (LV-MCS) for cardiogenic shock and requires prompt recognition and management. Increased central venous pressure (CVP) is an indicator of potent...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7485579/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33005634 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2020.00155 |
_version_ | 1783581177578258432 |
---|---|
author | Whitehead, Evan H. Thayer, Katherine L. Burkhoff, Daniel Uriel, Nir Ohman, E. Magnus O'Neill, William Kapur, Navin K. |
author_facet | Whitehead, Evan H. Thayer, Katherine L. Burkhoff, Daniel Uriel, Nir Ohman, E. Magnus O'Neill, William Kapur, Navin K. |
author_sort | Whitehead, Evan H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Right ventricular failure (RVF) is associated with increased mortality among patients receiving left ventricular mechanical circulatory support (LV-MCS) for cardiogenic shock and requires prompt recognition and management. Increased central venous pressure (CVP) is an indicator of potential RVF. Objectives: We studied whether elevated CVP during LV-MCS for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock is associated with higher mortality. Methods: Between January 2014 and June 2019, we analyzed hemodynamic parameters during Impella LV-MCS from 28 centers in the United States participating in the global, prospective catheter-based ventricular assist device (cVAD) study. A total of 132 patients with a documented CVP measurement while on Impella left-sided support for cardiogenic shock were identified. Results: CVP was significantly higher among patients who died in the hospital (14.0 vs. 11.7 mmHg, p = 0.014), and a CVP >12 identified patients at significantly higher risk for in-hospital mortality (65 vs. 45%, p = 0.02). CVP remained significantly associated with in-hospital mortality even after adjustment in a multivariable model (adjusted OR 1.10 [95% CI 1.02–1.19] per 1 mmHg increase). LV-MCS suction events were non-significantly more frequent among patients with high vs. low CVP (62.11 vs. 7.14 events, p = 0.067). Conclusion: CVP is a single, readily accessible hemodynamic parameter which predicts a higher rate of short-term mortality and may identify subclinical RVF in patients receiving LV-MCS for cardiogenic shock. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7485579 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74855792020-09-30 Central Venous Pressure and Clinical Outcomes During Left-Sided Mechanical Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock Whitehead, Evan H. Thayer, Katherine L. Burkhoff, Daniel Uriel, Nir Ohman, E. Magnus O'Neill, William Kapur, Navin K. Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine Background: Right ventricular failure (RVF) is associated with increased mortality among patients receiving left ventricular mechanical circulatory support (LV-MCS) for cardiogenic shock and requires prompt recognition and management. Increased central venous pressure (CVP) is an indicator of potential RVF. Objectives: We studied whether elevated CVP during LV-MCS for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock is associated with higher mortality. Methods: Between January 2014 and June 2019, we analyzed hemodynamic parameters during Impella LV-MCS from 28 centers in the United States participating in the global, prospective catheter-based ventricular assist device (cVAD) study. A total of 132 patients with a documented CVP measurement while on Impella left-sided support for cardiogenic shock were identified. Results: CVP was significantly higher among patients who died in the hospital (14.0 vs. 11.7 mmHg, p = 0.014), and a CVP >12 identified patients at significantly higher risk for in-hospital mortality (65 vs. 45%, p = 0.02). CVP remained significantly associated with in-hospital mortality even after adjustment in a multivariable model (adjusted OR 1.10 [95% CI 1.02–1.19] per 1 mmHg increase). LV-MCS suction events were non-significantly more frequent among patients with high vs. low CVP (62.11 vs. 7.14 events, p = 0.067). Conclusion: CVP is a single, readily accessible hemodynamic parameter which predicts a higher rate of short-term mortality and may identify subclinical RVF in patients receiving LV-MCS for cardiogenic shock. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7485579/ /pubmed/33005634 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2020.00155 Text en Copyright © 2020 Whitehead, Thayer, Burkhoff, Uriel, Ohman, O'Neill and Kapur. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Whitehead, Evan H. Thayer, Katherine L. Burkhoff, Daniel Uriel, Nir Ohman, E. Magnus O'Neill, William Kapur, Navin K. Central Venous Pressure and Clinical Outcomes During Left-Sided Mechanical Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock |
title | Central Venous Pressure and Clinical Outcomes During Left-Sided Mechanical Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock |
title_full | Central Venous Pressure and Clinical Outcomes During Left-Sided Mechanical Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock |
title_fullStr | Central Venous Pressure and Clinical Outcomes During Left-Sided Mechanical Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock |
title_full_unstemmed | Central Venous Pressure and Clinical Outcomes During Left-Sided Mechanical Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock |
title_short | Central Venous Pressure and Clinical Outcomes During Left-Sided Mechanical Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock |
title_sort | central venous pressure and clinical outcomes during left-sided mechanical support for acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7485579/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33005634 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2020.00155 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT whiteheadevanh centralvenouspressureandclinicaloutcomesduringleftsidedmechanicalsupportforacutemyocardialinfarctionandcardiogenicshock AT thayerkatherinel centralvenouspressureandclinicaloutcomesduringleftsidedmechanicalsupportforacutemyocardialinfarctionandcardiogenicshock AT burkhoffdaniel centralvenouspressureandclinicaloutcomesduringleftsidedmechanicalsupportforacutemyocardialinfarctionandcardiogenicshock AT urielnir centralvenouspressureandclinicaloutcomesduringleftsidedmechanicalsupportforacutemyocardialinfarctionandcardiogenicshock AT ohmanemagnus centralvenouspressureandclinicaloutcomesduringleftsidedmechanicalsupportforacutemyocardialinfarctionandcardiogenicshock AT oneillwilliam centralvenouspressureandclinicaloutcomesduringleftsidedmechanicalsupportforacutemyocardialinfarctionandcardiogenicshock AT kapurnavink centralvenouspressureandclinicaloutcomesduringleftsidedmechanicalsupportforacutemyocardialinfarctionandcardiogenicshock |