Cargando…

Central Venous Pressure and Clinical Outcomes During Left-Sided Mechanical Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock

Background: Right ventricular failure (RVF) is associated with increased mortality among patients receiving left ventricular mechanical circulatory support (LV-MCS) for cardiogenic shock and requires prompt recognition and management. Increased central venous pressure (CVP) is an indicator of potent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Whitehead, Evan H., Thayer, Katherine L., Burkhoff, Daniel, Uriel, Nir, Ohman, E. Magnus, O'Neill, William, Kapur, Navin K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7485579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33005634
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2020.00155
_version_ 1783581177578258432
author Whitehead, Evan H.
Thayer, Katherine L.
Burkhoff, Daniel
Uriel, Nir
Ohman, E. Magnus
O'Neill, William
Kapur, Navin K.
author_facet Whitehead, Evan H.
Thayer, Katherine L.
Burkhoff, Daniel
Uriel, Nir
Ohman, E. Magnus
O'Neill, William
Kapur, Navin K.
author_sort Whitehead, Evan H.
collection PubMed
description Background: Right ventricular failure (RVF) is associated with increased mortality among patients receiving left ventricular mechanical circulatory support (LV-MCS) for cardiogenic shock and requires prompt recognition and management. Increased central venous pressure (CVP) is an indicator of potential RVF. Objectives: We studied whether elevated CVP during LV-MCS for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock is associated with higher mortality. Methods: Between January 2014 and June 2019, we analyzed hemodynamic parameters during Impella LV-MCS from 28 centers in the United States participating in the global, prospective catheter-based ventricular assist device (cVAD) study. A total of 132 patients with a documented CVP measurement while on Impella left-sided support for cardiogenic shock were identified. Results: CVP was significantly higher among patients who died in the hospital (14.0 vs. 11.7 mmHg, p = 0.014), and a CVP >12 identified patients at significantly higher risk for in-hospital mortality (65 vs. 45%, p = 0.02). CVP remained significantly associated with in-hospital mortality even after adjustment in a multivariable model (adjusted OR 1.10 [95% CI 1.02–1.19] per 1 mmHg increase). LV-MCS suction events were non-significantly more frequent among patients with high vs. low CVP (62.11 vs. 7.14 events, p = 0.067). Conclusion: CVP is a single, readily accessible hemodynamic parameter which predicts a higher rate of short-term mortality and may identify subclinical RVF in patients receiving LV-MCS for cardiogenic shock.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7485579
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74855792020-09-30 Central Venous Pressure and Clinical Outcomes During Left-Sided Mechanical Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock Whitehead, Evan H. Thayer, Katherine L. Burkhoff, Daniel Uriel, Nir Ohman, E. Magnus O'Neill, William Kapur, Navin K. Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine Background: Right ventricular failure (RVF) is associated with increased mortality among patients receiving left ventricular mechanical circulatory support (LV-MCS) for cardiogenic shock and requires prompt recognition and management. Increased central venous pressure (CVP) is an indicator of potential RVF. Objectives: We studied whether elevated CVP during LV-MCS for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock is associated with higher mortality. Methods: Between January 2014 and June 2019, we analyzed hemodynamic parameters during Impella LV-MCS from 28 centers in the United States participating in the global, prospective catheter-based ventricular assist device (cVAD) study. A total of 132 patients with a documented CVP measurement while on Impella left-sided support for cardiogenic shock were identified. Results: CVP was significantly higher among patients who died in the hospital (14.0 vs. 11.7 mmHg, p = 0.014), and a CVP >12 identified patients at significantly higher risk for in-hospital mortality (65 vs. 45%, p = 0.02). CVP remained significantly associated with in-hospital mortality even after adjustment in a multivariable model (adjusted OR 1.10 [95% CI 1.02–1.19] per 1 mmHg increase). LV-MCS suction events were non-significantly more frequent among patients with high vs. low CVP (62.11 vs. 7.14 events, p = 0.067). Conclusion: CVP is a single, readily accessible hemodynamic parameter which predicts a higher rate of short-term mortality and may identify subclinical RVF in patients receiving LV-MCS for cardiogenic shock. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7485579/ /pubmed/33005634 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2020.00155 Text en Copyright © 2020 Whitehead, Thayer, Burkhoff, Uriel, Ohman, O'Neill and Kapur. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Whitehead, Evan H.
Thayer, Katherine L.
Burkhoff, Daniel
Uriel, Nir
Ohman, E. Magnus
O'Neill, William
Kapur, Navin K.
Central Venous Pressure and Clinical Outcomes During Left-Sided Mechanical Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock
title Central Venous Pressure and Clinical Outcomes During Left-Sided Mechanical Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock
title_full Central Venous Pressure and Clinical Outcomes During Left-Sided Mechanical Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock
title_fullStr Central Venous Pressure and Clinical Outcomes During Left-Sided Mechanical Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock
title_full_unstemmed Central Venous Pressure and Clinical Outcomes During Left-Sided Mechanical Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock
title_short Central Venous Pressure and Clinical Outcomes During Left-Sided Mechanical Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock
title_sort central venous pressure and clinical outcomes during left-sided mechanical support for acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7485579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33005634
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2020.00155
work_keys_str_mv AT whiteheadevanh centralvenouspressureandclinicaloutcomesduringleftsidedmechanicalsupportforacutemyocardialinfarctionandcardiogenicshock
AT thayerkatherinel centralvenouspressureandclinicaloutcomesduringleftsidedmechanicalsupportforacutemyocardialinfarctionandcardiogenicshock
AT burkhoffdaniel centralvenouspressureandclinicaloutcomesduringleftsidedmechanicalsupportforacutemyocardialinfarctionandcardiogenicshock
AT urielnir centralvenouspressureandclinicaloutcomesduringleftsidedmechanicalsupportforacutemyocardialinfarctionandcardiogenicshock
AT ohmanemagnus centralvenouspressureandclinicaloutcomesduringleftsidedmechanicalsupportforacutemyocardialinfarctionandcardiogenicshock
AT oneillwilliam centralvenouspressureandclinicaloutcomesduringleftsidedmechanicalsupportforacutemyocardialinfarctionandcardiogenicshock
AT kapurnavink centralvenouspressureandclinicaloutcomesduringleftsidedmechanicalsupportforacutemyocardialinfarctionandcardiogenicshock