Cargando…
Impact of social media interventions and tools among informal caregivers of critically ill patients after patient admission to the intensive care unit: A scoping review
BACKGROUND: The use of social media in healthcare continues to evolve. The purpose of this scoping review was to summarize existing research on the impact of social media interventions and tools among informal caregivers of critically ill patients after patient admission to the intensive care unit (...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7485758/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32915848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238803 |
_version_ | 1783581208352915456 |
---|---|
author | Cherak, Stephana J. Rosgen, Brianna K. Amarbayan, Mungunzul Plotnikoff, Kara Wollny, Krista Stelfox, Henry T. Fiest, Kirsten M. |
author_facet | Cherak, Stephana J. Rosgen, Brianna K. Amarbayan, Mungunzul Plotnikoff, Kara Wollny, Krista Stelfox, Henry T. Fiest, Kirsten M. |
author_sort | Cherak, Stephana J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The use of social media in healthcare continues to evolve. The purpose of this scoping review was to summarize existing research on the impact of social media interventions and tools among informal caregivers of critically ill patients after patient admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: This review followed established scoping review methods, including an extensive a priori-defined search strategy implemented in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials databases to July 10, 2020. Primary research studies reporting on the use of social media by informal caregivers for critically ill patients were included. RESULTS: We identified 400 unique citations and thirty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. Nine were interventional trials–four randomized controlled trials (RCTs)–and a majority (n = 14) were conducted (i.e., data collected) between 2013 to 2015. Communication platforms (e.g., Text Messaging, Web Camera) were the most commonly used social media tool (n = 17), followed by social networking sites (e.g., Facebook, Instagram) (n = 6), and content communities (e.g., YouTube, SlideShare) (n = 5). Nine studies’ primary objective was caregiver satisfaction, followed by self-care (n = 6), and health literacy (n = 5). Nearly every study reported an outcome on usage feasibility (e.g., user attitudes, preferences, demographics) (n = 30), and twenty-three studies reported an outcome related to patient and caregiver satisfaction. Among the studies that assessed statistical significance (n = 18), 12 reported statistically significant positive effects of social media use. Overall, 16 of the 31 studies reported positive conclusions (e.g., increased knowledge, satisfaction, involvement) regarding the use of social media among informal caregivers for critically ill patients. CONCLUSIONS: Social media has potential benefits for caregivers of the critically ill. More robust and clinically relevant studies are required to identify effective social media strategies used among caregivers for the critically ill. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7485758 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74857582020-09-21 Impact of social media interventions and tools among informal caregivers of critically ill patients after patient admission to the intensive care unit: A scoping review Cherak, Stephana J. Rosgen, Brianna K. Amarbayan, Mungunzul Plotnikoff, Kara Wollny, Krista Stelfox, Henry T. Fiest, Kirsten M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The use of social media in healthcare continues to evolve. The purpose of this scoping review was to summarize existing research on the impact of social media interventions and tools among informal caregivers of critically ill patients after patient admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: This review followed established scoping review methods, including an extensive a priori-defined search strategy implemented in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials databases to July 10, 2020. Primary research studies reporting on the use of social media by informal caregivers for critically ill patients were included. RESULTS: We identified 400 unique citations and thirty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. Nine were interventional trials–four randomized controlled trials (RCTs)–and a majority (n = 14) were conducted (i.e., data collected) between 2013 to 2015. Communication platforms (e.g., Text Messaging, Web Camera) were the most commonly used social media tool (n = 17), followed by social networking sites (e.g., Facebook, Instagram) (n = 6), and content communities (e.g., YouTube, SlideShare) (n = 5). Nine studies’ primary objective was caregiver satisfaction, followed by self-care (n = 6), and health literacy (n = 5). Nearly every study reported an outcome on usage feasibility (e.g., user attitudes, preferences, demographics) (n = 30), and twenty-three studies reported an outcome related to patient and caregiver satisfaction. Among the studies that assessed statistical significance (n = 18), 12 reported statistically significant positive effects of social media use. Overall, 16 of the 31 studies reported positive conclusions (e.g., increased knowledge, satisfaction, involvement) regarding the use of social media among informal caregivers for critically ill patients. CONCLUSIONS: Social media has potential benefits for caregivers of the critically ill. More robust and clinically relevant studies are required to identify effective social media strategies used among caregivers for the critically ill. Public Library of Science 2020-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7485758/ /pubmed/32915848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238803 Text en © 2020 Cherak et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cherak, Stephana J. Rosgen, Brianna K. Amarbayan, Mungunzul Plotnikoff, Kara Wollny, Krista Stelfox, Henry T. Fiest, Kirsten M. Impact of social media interventions and tools among informal caregivers of critically ill patients after patient admission to the intensive care unit: A scoping review |
title | Impact of social media interventions and tools among informal caregivers of critically ill patients after patient admission to the intensive care unit: A scoping review |
title_full | Impact of social media interventions and tools among informal caregivers of critically ill patients after patient admission to the intensive care unit: A scoping review |
title_fullStr | Impact of social media interventions and tools among informal caregivers of critically ill patients after patient admission to the intensive care unit: A scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of social media interventions and tools among informal caregivers of critically ill patients after patient admission to the intensive care unit: A scoping review |
title_short | Impact of social media interventions and tools among informal caregivers of critically ill patients after patient admission to the intensive care unit: A scoping review |
title_sort | impact of social media interventions and tools among informal caregivers of critically ill patients after patient admission to the intensive care unit: a scoping review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7485758/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32915848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238803 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cherakstephanaj impactofsocialmediainterventionsandtoolsamonginformalcaregiversofcriticallyillpatientsafterpatientadmissiontotheintensivecareunitascopingreview AT rosgenbriannak impactofsocialmediainterventionsandtoolsamonginformalcaregiversofcriticallyillpatientsafterpatientadmissiontotheintensivecareunitascopingreview AT amarbayanmungunzul impactofsocialmediainterventionsandtoolsamonginformalcaregiversofcriticallyillpatientsafterpatientadmissiontotheintensivecareunitascopingreview AT plotnikoffkara impactofsocialmediainterventionsandtoolsamonginformalcaregiversofcriticallyillpatientsafterpatientadmissiontotheintensivecareunitascopingreview AT wollnykrista impactofsocialmediainterventionsandtoolsamonginformalcaregiversofcriticallyillpatientsafterpatientadmissiontotheintensivecareunitascopingreview AT stelfoxhenryt impactofsocialmediainterventionsandtoolsamonginformalcaregiversofcriticallyillpatientsafterpatientadmissiontotheintensivecareunitascopingreview AT fiestkirstenm impactofsocialmediainterventionsandtoolsamonginformalcaregiversofcriticallyillpatientsafterpatientadmissiontotheintensivecareunitascopingreview |