Cargando…

Computational assessment of the feasibility of protonation-based protein sequencing

Recent advances in DNA sequencing methods revolutionized biology by providing highly accurate reads, with high throughput or high read length. These read data are being used in many biological and medical applications. Modern DNA sequencing methods have no equivalent in protein sequencing, severely...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miclotte, Giles, Martens, Koen, Fostier, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7485799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32915813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238625
_version_ 1783581218105720832
author Miclotte, Giles
Martens, Koen
Fostier, Jan
author_facet Miclotte, Giles
Martens, Koen
Fostier, Jan
author_sort Miclotte, Giles
collection PubMed
description Recent advances in DNA sequencing methods revolutionized biology by providing highly accurate reads, with high throughput or high read length. These read data are being used in many biological and medical applications. Modern DNA sequencing methods have no equivalent in protein sequencing, severely limiting the widespread application of protein data. Recently, several optical protein sequencing methods have been proposed that rely on the fluorescent labeling of amino acids. Here, we introduce the reprotonation-deprotonation protein sequencing method. Unlike other methods, this proposed technique relies on the measurement of an electrical signal and requires no fluorescent labeling. In reprotonation-deprotonation protein sequencing, the terminal amino acid is identified through its unique protonation signal, and by repeatedly cleaving the terminal amino acids one-by-one, each amino acid in the peptide is measured. By means of simulations, we show that, given a reference database of known proteins, reprotonation-deprotonation sequencing has the potential to correctly identify proteins in a sample. Our simulations provide target values for the signal-to-noise ratios that sensor devices need to attain in order to detect reprotonation-deprotonation events, as well as suitable pH values and required measurement times per amino acid. For instance, an SNR of 10 is required for a 61.71% proteome recovery rate with 100 ms measurement time per amino acid.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7485799
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74857992020-09-21 Computational assessment of the feasibility of protonation-based protein sequencing Miclotte, Giles Martens, Koen Fostier, Jan PLoS One Research Article Recent advances in DNA sequencing methods revolutionized biology by providing highly accurate reads, with high throughput or high read length. These read data are being used in many biological and medical applications. Modern DNA sequencing methods have no equivalent in protein sequencing, severely limiting the widespread application of protein data. Recently, several optical protein sequencing methods have been proposed that rely on the fluorescent labeling of amino acids. Here, we introduce the reprotonation-deprotonation protein sequencing method. Unlike other methods, this proposed technique relies on the measurement of an electrical signal and requires no fluorescent labeling. In reprotonation-deprotonation protein sequencing, the terminal amino acid is identified through its unique protonation signal, and by repeatedly cleaving the terminal amino acids one-by-one, each amino acid in the peptide is measured. By means of simulations, we show that, given a reference database of known proteins, reprotonation-deprotonation sequencing has the potential to correctly identify proteins in a sample. Our simulations provide target values for the signal-to-noise ratios that sensor devices need to attain in order to detect reprotonation-deprotonation events, as well as suitable pH values and required measurement times per amino acid. For instance, an SNR of 10 is required for a 61.71% proteome recovery rate with 100 ms measurement time per amino acid. Public Library of Science 2020-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7485799/ /pubmed/32915813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238625 Text en © 2020 Miclotte et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Miclotte, Giles
Martens, Koen
Fostier, Jan
Computational assessment of the feasibility of protonation-based protein sequencing
title Computational assessment of the feasibility of protonation-based protein sequencing
title_full Computational assessment of the feasibility of protonation-based protein sequencing
title_fullStr Computational assessment of the feasibility of protonation-based protein sequencing
title_full_unstemmed Computational assessment of the feasibility of protonation-based protein sequencing
title_short Computational assessment of the feasibility of protonation-based protein sequencing
title_sort computational assessment of the feasibility of protonation-based protein sequencing
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7485799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32915813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238625
work_keys_str_mv AT miclottegiles computationalassessmentofthefeasibilityofprotonationbasedproteinsequencing
AT martenskoen computationalassessmentofthefeasibilityofprotonationbasedproteinsequencing
AT fostierjan computationalassessmentofthefeasibilityofprotonationbasedproteinsequencing