Cargando…

Evaluating the implementation of the Reproductive Life Plan in disadvantaged communities: A mixed-methods study using the i-PARIHS framework

INTRODUCTION: The Reproductive Life Plan (RLP) is a clinical tool to help clients find strategies to achieve their reproductive goals. Despite much research on the RLP from high-income countries, it has never been studied in low- or middle income countries. Together with health workers called Mentor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niemeyer Hultstrand, Jenny, Engström, Ellinor, Målqvist, Mats, Tydén, Tanja, Maseko, Nokuthula, Jonsson, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7485818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32915798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236712
_version_ 1783581222609354752
author Niemeyer Hultstrand, Jenny
Engström, Ellinor
Målqvist, Mats
Tydén, Tanja
Maseko, Nokuthula
Jonsson, Maria
author_facet Niemeyer Hultstrand, Jenny
Engström, Ellinor
Målqvist, Mats
Tydén, Tanja
Maseko, Nokuthula
Jonsson, Maria
author_sort Niemeyer Hultstrand, Jenny
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Reproductive Life Plan (RLP) is a clinical tool to help clients find strategies to achieve their reproductive goals. Despite much research on the RLP from high-income countries, it has never been studied in low- or middle income countries. Together with health workers called Mentor Mothers (MMs), we used a context-adapted RLP in disadvantaged areas in Eswatini. Our aim was to evaluate the implementation of the RLP in this setting. METHODOLOGY: MMs participated in focus group discussions (FGDs, n = 3 MMs n = 29) in January 2018 and at follow-up in May 2018 (n = 4, MMs n = 24). FGDs covered challenges in using the RLP, how to adapt it, and later experiences from using it. We used a deductive qualitative thematic analysis with the integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework, creating themes guided by its four constructs: facilitation, innovation, recipients and context. The MMs also answered a questionnaire to assess the implementation process inspired by normalization process theory. RESULTS: The RLP intervention was feasible and acceptable among MMs and fit well with existing practices. The RLP questions were perceived as advantageous since they opened up discussions with clients and enabled reflection. All except one MM (n = 23) agreed or strongly agreed that they valued the effect the RLP has had on their work. Using the RLP, the MMs observed progress in pregnancy planning among their clients and thought it improved the quality of contraceptive counselling. The clients’ ability to form and achieve their reproductive goals was hampered by contextual factors such as intimate partner violence and women’s limited reproductive health and rights. DISCUSSION: The RLP was easily implemented in these disadvantaged communities and the MMs were key persons in this intervention. The RLP should be further evaluated among clients and suitable approaches to include partners are required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7485818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74858182020-09-21 Evaluating the implementation of the Reproductive Life Plan in disadvantaged communities: A mixed-methods study using the i-PARIHS framework Niemeyer Hultstrand, Jenny Engström, Ellinor Målqvist, Mats Tydén, Tanja Maseko, Nokuthula Jonsson, Maria PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: The Reproductive Life Plan (RLP) is a clinical tool to help clients find strategies to achieve their reproductive goals. Despite much research on the RLP from high-income countries, it has never been studied in low- or middle income countries. Together with health workers called Mentor Mothers (MMs), we used a context-adapted RLP in disadvantaged areas in Eswatini. Our aim was to evaluate the implementation of the RLP in this setting. METHODOLOGY: MMs participated in focus group discussions (FGDs, n = 3 MMs n = 29) in January 2018 and at follow-up in May 2018 (n = 4, MMs n = 24). FGDs covered challenges in using the RLP, how to adapt it, and later experiences from using it. We used a deductive qualitative thematic analysis with the integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework, creating themes guided by its four constructs: facilitation, innovation, recipients and context. The MMs also answered a questionnaire to assess the implementation process inspired by normalization process theory. RESULTS: The RLP intervention was feasible and acceptable among MMs and fit well with existing practices. The RLP questions were perceived as advantageous since they opened up discussions with clients and enabled reflection. All except one MM (n = 23) agreed or strongly agreed that they valued the effect the RLP has had on their work. Using the RLP, the MMs observed progress in pregnancy planning among their clients and thought it improved the quality of contraceptive counselling. The clients’ ability to form and achieve their reproductive goals was hampered by contextual factors such as intimate partner violence and women’s limited reproductive health and rights. DISCUSSION: The RLP was easily implemented in these disadvantaged communities and the MMs were key persons in this intervention. The RLP should be further evaluated among clients and suitable approaches to include partners are required. Public Library of Science 2020-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7485818/ /pubmed/32915798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236712 Text en © 2020 Niemeyer Hultstrand et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Niemeyer Hultstrand, Jenny
Engström, Ellinor
Målqvist, Mats
Tydén, Tanja
Maseko, Nokuthula
Jonsson, Maria
Evaluating the implementation of the Reproductive Life Plan in disadvantaged communities: A mixed-methods study using the i-PARIHS framework
title Evaluating the implementation of the Reproductive Life Plan in disadvantaged communities: A mixed-methods study using the i-PARIHS framework
title_full Evaluating the implementation of the Reproductive Life Plan in disadvantaged communities: A mixed-methods study using the i-PARIHS framework
title_fullStr Evaluating the implementation of the Reproductive Life Plan in disadvantaged communities: A mixed-methods study using the i-PARIHS framework
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the implementation of the Reproductive Life Plan in disadvantaged communities: A mixed-methods study using the i-PARIHS framework
title_short Evaluating the implementation of the Reproductive Life Plan in disadvantaged communities: A mixed-methods study using the i-PARIHS framework
title_sort evaluating the implementation of the reproductive life plan in disadvantaged communities: a mixed-methods study using the i-parihs framework
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7485818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32915798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236712
work_keys_str_mv AT niemeyerhultstrandjenny evaluatingtheimplementationofthereproductivelifeplanindisadvantagedcommunitiesamixedmethodsstudyusingtheiparihsframework
AT engstromellinor evaluatingtheimplementationofthereproductivelifeplanindisadvantagedcommunitiesamixedmethodsstudyusingtheiparihsframework
AT malqvistmats evaluatingtheimplementationofthereproductivelifeplanindisadvantagedcommunitiesamixedmethodsstudyusingtheiparihsframework
AT tydentanja evaluatingtheimplementationofthereproductivelifeplanindisadvantagedcommunitiesamixedmethodsstudyusingtheiparihsframework
AT masekonokuthula evaluatingtheimplementationofthereproductivelifeplanindisadvantagedcommunitiesamixedmethodsstudyusingtheiparihsframework
AT jonssonmaria evaluatingtheimplementationofthereproductivelifeplanindisadvantagedcommunitiesamixedmethodsstudyusingtheiparihsframework