Cargando…
A modified technique of mega prosthesis revision on non-neoplastic patient: Case report
INTRODUCTION: Mega prosthesis is mainly used for the treatment of the oncologic patient whose limb underwent salvage surgery that caused the limb to lose significant bone or soft tissue. In recent years, mega prosthesis can also be used to treat non-oncologic patients. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We prese...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7486417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32953102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.08.036 |
_version_ | 1783581331699007488 |
---|---|
author | Prabowo, Yogi Ramang, Didi Saputra Farqani, Syahdi Arya Mahendra Karda, I Wayan |
author_facet | Prabowo, Yogi Ramang, Didi Saputra Farqani, Syahdi Arya Mahendra Karda, I Wayan |
author_sort | Prabowo, Yogi |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Mega prosthesis is mainly used for the treatment of the oncologic patient whose limb underwent salvage surgery that caused the limb to lose significant bone or soft tissue. In recent years, mega prosthesis can also be used to treat non-oncologic patients. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We presented a case of a 40-year-old male with chief complain of pain on the right knee 5 months before admission. Four years previously, the patient sustained motor vehicle accident that fractured his head of femur dan distal femur. He underwent 2-staged surgery for his femoral head and distal femur. However, he presented a year later with signs of non-union and finally underwent mega prosthesis surgery on his distal femur. During his follow up, he experienced a fracture on his prosthesis 3 years later and was referred to our institution. Physical examination shows deformity and slight varus on the right knee, and limited range of motion. The patient then underwent implant revisions. DISCUSSION: After 12 months of post revision surgery follow-up, the patient was able to walk independently. Our patient has not had any sign or episode of failure after the follow up for 12 months. According to literature, the incidence of failure is mostly at 48–72 months post implantation. CONCLUSION: The problem for this patient maybe caused by the mechanical fatigue of the implant due to stress addressed to the implant. Our current technique of revisions procedure hopefully will enhance the power of the mega prosthesis for further usage. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7486417 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74864172020-09-17 A modified technique of mega prosthesis revision on non-neoplastic patient: Case report Prabowo, Yogi Ramang, Didi Saputra Farqani, Syahdi Arya Mahendra Karda, I Wayan Ann Med Surg (Lond) Case Report INTRODUCTION: Mega prosthesis is mainly used for the treatment of the oncologic patient whose limb underwent salvage surgery that caused the limb to lose significant bone or soft tissue. In recent years, mega prosthesis can also be used to treat non-oncologic patients. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We presented a case of a 40-year-old male with chief complain of pain on the right knee 5 months before admission. Four years previously, the patient sustained motor vehicle accident that fractured his head of femur dan distal femur. He underwent 2-staged surgery for his femoral head and distal femur. However, he presented a year later with signs of non-union and finally underwent mega prosthesis surgery on his distal femur. During his follow up, he experienced a fracture on his prosthesis 3 years later and was referred to our institution. Physical examination shows deformity and slight varus on the right knee, and limited range of motion. The patient then underwent implant revisions. DISCUSSION: After 12 months of post revision surgery follow-up, the patient was able to walk independently. Our patient has not had any sign or episode of failure after the follow up for 12 months. According to literature, the incidence of failure is mostly at 48–72 months post implantation. CONCLUSION: The problem for this patient maybe caused by the mechanical fatigue of the implant due to stress addressed to the implant. Our current technique of revisions procedure hopefully will enhance the power of the mega prosthesis for further usage. Elsevier 2020-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7486417/ /pubmed/32953102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.08.036 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IJS Publishing Group Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Case Report Prabowo, Yogi Ramang, Didi Saputra Farqani, Syahdi Arya Mahendra Karda, I Wayan A modified technique of mega prosthesis revision on non-neoplastic patient: Case report |
title | A modified technique of mega prosthesis revision on non-neoplastic patient: Case report |
title_full | A modified technique of mega prosthesis revision on non-neoplastic patient: Case report |
title_fullStr | A modified technique of mega prosthesis revision on non-neoplastic patient: Case report |
title_full_unstemmed | A modified technique of mega prosthesis revision on non-neoplastic patient: Case report |
title_short | A modified technique of mega prosthesis revision on non-neoplastic patient: Case report |
title_sort | modified technique of mega prosthesis revision on non-neoplastic patient: case report |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7486417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32953102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.08.036 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT prabowoyogi amodifiedtechniqueofmegaprosthesisrevisiononnonneoplasticpatientcasereport AT ramangdidisaputra amodifiedtechniqueofmegaprosthesisrevisiononnonneoplasticpatientcasereport AT farqanisyahdi amodifiedtechniqueofmegaprosthesisrevisiononnonneoplasticpatientcasereport AT aryamahendrakardaiwayan amodifiedtechniqueofmegaprosthesisrevisiononnonneoplasticpatientcasereport AT prabowoyogi modifiedtechniqueofmegaprosthesisrevisiononnonneoplasticpatientcasereport AT ramangdidisaputra modifiedtechniqueofmegaprosthesisrevisiononnonneoplasticpatientcasereport AT farqanisyahdi modifiedtechniqueofmegaprosthesisrevisiononnonneoplasticpatientcasereport AT aryamahendrakardaiwayan modifiedtechniqueofmegaprosthesisrevisiononnonneoplasticpatientcasereport |