Cargando…

Growth differences in patients with dental agenesis, how its location impacts facial morphology

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Non-formation of a tooth impacts the morphology of the alveolar bone, which may, in turn, generate an imbalance in facial growth. This retrospective case-control study aimed to determine whether observable differences exist in the facial growth of patients with dental agenesis re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Herrera-Atoche, José Rubén, Medina-Mazariegos, Carlos Roberto, Zúñiga-Herrera, Iván Daniel, Colomé-Ruiz, Gabriel Eduardo, Aguilar-Ayala, Fernando Javier, Pinzón-Te, Alicia Leonor, Aguilar-Pérez, Fernando Javier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7486496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32952892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2020.03.006
_version_ 1783581343191400448
author Herrera-Atoche, José Rubén
Medina-Mazariegos, Carlos Roberto
Zúñiga-Herrera, Iván Daniel
Colomé-Ruiz, Gabriel Eduardo
Aguilar-Ayala, Fernando Javier
Pinzón-Te, Alicia Leonor
Aguilar-Pérez, Fernando Javier
author_facet Herrera-Atoche, José Rubén
Medina-Mazariegos, Carlos Roberto
Zúñiga-Herrera, Iván Daniel
Colomé-Ruiz, Gabriel Eduardo
Aguilar-Ayala, Fernando Javier
Pinzón-Te, Alicia Leonor
Aguilar-Pérez, Fernando Javier
author_sort Herrera-Atoche, José Rubén
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Non-formation of a tooth impacts the morphology of the alveolar bone, which may, in turn, generate an imbalance in facial growth. This retrospective case-control study aimed to determine whether observable differences exist in the facial growth of patients with dental agenesis relative to complete dentition controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample comprised 75 patients with dental agenesis, and each case was paired with two controls of the same age and gender (n = 150). All patients were measured cephalometrically (31 variables), and both groups were compared with student's t- or Z-test (P < 0.05). Subsequently, ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis tests (P < 0.05) were used to compare facial growth depending on the missing tooth's sagittal location in the dental arch (anterior or posterior agenesis); as well as its location in the affected bone (maxillary, mandibular, or both). RESULTS: Four measurements with significant differences were found, whereas ten were found in the sagittal location in the dental arch analysis. Regarding the affected bone, there were no affected variables. CONCLUSION: it was found that patients with dental agenesis show differences in the sagittal growth of the upper jaw and in the position of the lower incisor. In the studied population, these changes are strongly influenced by the sagittal location of the missing tooth, while its location in the jaws does not affect facial growth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7486496
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74864962020-09-18 Growth differences in patients with dental agenesis, how its location impacts facial morphology Herrera-Atoche, José Rubén Medina-Mazariegos, Carlos Roberto Zúñiga-Herrera, Iván Daniel Colomé-Ruiz, Gabriel Eduardo Aguilar-Ayala, Fernando Javier Pinzón-Te, Alicia Leonor Aguilar-Pérez, Fernando Javier J Dent Sci Original Article BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Non-formation of a tooth impacts the morphology of the alveolar bone, which may, in turn, generate an imbalance in facial growth. This retrospective case-control study aimed to determine whether observable differences exist in the facial growth of patients with dental agenesis relative to complete dentition controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample comprised 75 patients with dental agenesis, and each case was paired with two controls of the same age and gender (n = 150). All patients were measured cephalometrically (31 variables), and both groups were compared with student's t- or Z-test (P < 0.05). Subsequently, ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis tests (P < 0.05) were used to compare facial growth depending on the missing tooth's sagittal location in the dental arch (anterior or posterior agenesis); as well as its location in the affected bone (maxillary, mandibular, or both). RESULTS: Four measurements with significant differences were found, whereas ten were found in the sagittal location in the dental arch analysis. Regarding the affected bone, there were no affected variables. CONCLUSION: it was found that patients with dental agenesis show differences in the sagittal growth of the upper jaw and in the position of the lower incisor. In the studied population, these changes are strongly influenced by the sagittal location of the missing tooth, while its location in the jaws does not affect facial growth. Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China 2020-09 2020-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7486496/ /pubmed/32952892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2020.03.006 Text en © 2020 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Herrera-Atoche, José Rubén
Medina-Mazariegos, Carlos Roberto
Zúñiga-Herrera, Iván Daniel
Colomé-Ruiz, Gabriel Eduardo
Aguilar-Ayala, Fernando Javier
Pinzón-Te, Alicia Leonor
Aguilar-Pérez, Fernando Javier
Growth differences in patients with dental agenesis, how its location impacts facial morphology
title Growth differences in patients with dental agenesis, how its location impacts facial morphology
title_full Growth differences in patients with dental agenesis, how its location impacts facial morphology
title_fullStr Growth differences in patients with dental agenesis, how its location impacts facial morphology
title_full_unstemmed Growth differences in patients with dental agenesis, how its location impacts facial morphology
title_short Growth differences in patients with dental agenesis, how its location impacts facial morphology
title_sort growth differences in patients with dental agenesis, how its location impacts facial morphology
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7486496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32952892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2020.03.006
work_keys_str_mv AT herreraatochejoseruben growthdifferencesinpatientswithdentalagenesishowitslocationimpactsfacialmorphology
AT medinamazariegoscarlosroberto growthdifferencesinpatientswithdentalagenesishowitslocationimpactsfacialmorphology
AT zunigaherreraivandaniel growthdifferencesinpatientswithdentalagenesishowitslocationimpactsfacialmorphology
AT colomeruizgabrieleduardo growthdifferencesinpatientswithdentalagenesishowitslocationimpactsfacialmorphology
AT aguilarayalafernandojavier growthdifferencesinpatientswithdentalagenesishowitslocationimpactsfacialmorphology
AT pinzontealicialeonor growthdifferencesinpatientswithdentalagenesishowitslocationimpactsfacialmorphology
AT aguilarperezfernandojavier growthdifferencesinpatientswithdentalagenesishowitslocationimpactsfacialmorphology