Cargando…
Growth differences in patients with dental agenesis, how its location impacts facial morphology
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Non-formation of a tooth impacts the morphology of the alveolar bone, which may, in turn, generate an imbalance in facial growth. This retrospective case-control study aimed to determine whether observable differences exist in the facial growth of patients with dental agenesis re...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7486496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32952892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2020.03.006 |
_version_ | 1783581343191400448 |
---|---|
author | Herrera-Atoche, José Rubén Medina-Mazariegos, Carlos Roberto Zúñiga-Herrera, Iván Daniel Colomé-Ruiz, Gabriel Eduardo Aguilar-Ayala, Fernando Javier Pinzón-Te, Alicia Leonor Aguilar-Pérez, Fernando Javier |
author_facet | Herrera-Atoche, José Rubén Medina-Mazariegos, Carlos Roberto Zúñiga-Herrera, Iván Daniel Colomé-Ruiz, Gabriel Eduardo Aguilar-Ayala, Fernando Javier Pinzón-Te, Alicia Leonor Aguilar-Pérez, Fernando Javier |
author_sort | Herrera-Atoche, José Rubén |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Non-formation of a tooth impacts the morphology of the alveolar bone, which may, in turn, generate an imbalance in facial growth. This retrospective case-control study aimed to determine whether observable differences exist in the facial growth of patients with dental agenesis relative to complete dentition controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample comprised 75 patients with dental agenesis, and each case was paired with two controls of the same age and gender (n = 150). All patients were measured cephalometrically (31 variables), and both groups were compared with student's t- or Z-test (P < 0.05). Subsequently, ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis tests (P < 0.05) were used to compare facial growth depending on the missing tooth's sagittal location in the dental arch (anterior or posterior agenesis); as well as its location in the affected bone (maxillary, mandibular, or both). RESULTS: Four measurements with significant differences were found, whereas ten were found in the sagittal location in the dental arch analysis. Regarding the affected bone, there were no affected variables. CONCLUSION: it was found that patients with dental agenesis show differences in the sagittal growth of the upper jaw and in the position of the lower incisor. In the studied population, these changes are strongly influenced by the sagittal location of the missing tooth, while its location in the jaws does not affect facial growth. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7486496 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74864962020-09-18 Growth differences in patients with dental agenesis, how its location impacts facial morphology Herrera-Atoche, José Rubén Medina-Mazariegos, Carlos Roberto Zúñiga-Herrera, Iván Daniel Colomé-Ruiz, Gabriel Eduardo Aguilar-Ayala, Fernando Javier Pinzón-Te, Alicia Leonor Aguilar-Pérez, Fernando Javier J Dent Sci Original Article BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Non-formation of a tooth impacts the morphology of the alveolar bone, which may, in turn, generate an imbalance in facial growth. This retrospective case-control study aimed to determine whether observable differences exist in the facial growth of patients with dental agenesis relative to complete dentition controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample comprised 75 patients with dental agenesis, and each case was paired with two controls of the same age and gender (n = 150). All patients were measured cephalometrically (31 variables), and both groups were compared with student's t- or Z-test (P < 0.05). Subsequently, ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis tests (P < 0.05) were used to compare facial growth depending on the missing tooth's sagittal location in the dental arch (anterior or posterior agenesis); as well as its location in the affected bone (maxillary, mandibular, or both). RESULTS: Four measurements with significant differences were found, whereas ten were found in the sagittal location in the dental arch analysis. Regarding the affected bone, there were no affected variables. CONCLUSION: it was found that patients with dental agenesis show differences in the sagittal growth of the upper jaw and in the position of the lower incisor. In the studied population, these changes are strongly influenced by the sagittal location of the missing tooth, while its location in the jaws does not affect facial growth. Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China 2020-09 2020-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7486496/ /pubmed/32952892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2020.03.006 Text en © 2020 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Herrera-Atoche, José Rubén Medina-Mazariegos, Carlos Roberto Zúñiga-Herrera, Iván Daniel Colomé-Ruiz, Gabriel Eduardo Aguilar-Ayala, Fernando Javier Pinzón-Te, Alicia Leonor Aguilar-Pérez, Fernando Javier Growth differences in patients with dental agenesis, how its location impacts facial morphology |
title | Growth differences in patients with dental agenesis, how its location impacts facial morphology |
title_full | Growth differences in patients with dental agenesis, how its location impacts facial morphology |
title_fullStr | Growth differences in patients with dental agenesis, how its location impacts facial morphology |
title_full_unstemmed | Growth differences in patients with dental agenesis, how its location impacts facial morphology |
title_short | Growth differences in patients with dental agenesis, how its location impacts facial morphology |
title_sort | growth differences in patients with dental agenesis, how its location impacts facial morphology |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7486496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32952892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2020.03.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT herreraatochejoseruben growthdifferencesinpatientswithdentalagenesishowitslocationimpactsfacialmorphology AT medinamazariegoscarlosroberto growthdifferencesinpatientswithdentalagenesishowitslocationimpactsfacialmorphology AT zunigaherreraivandaniel growthdifferencesinpatientswithdentalagenesishowitslocationimpactsfacialmorphology AT colomeruizgabrieleduardo growthdifferencesinpatientswithdentalagenesishowitslocationimpactsfacialmorphology AT aguilarayalafernandojavier growthdifferencesinpatientswithdentalagenesishowitslocationimpactsfacialmorphology AT pinzontealicialeonor growthdifferencesinpatientswithdentalagenesishowitslocationimpactsfacialmorphology AT aguilarperezfernandojavier growthdifferencesinpatientswithdentalagenesishowitslocationimpactsfacialmorphology |