Cargando…

Global trends in clinical trials involving pluripotent stem cells: a systematic multi-database analysis

Pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) hold great potential for novel therapeutic approaches to regenerate or replace functionally impaired tissues. Since the introduction of the induced pluripotent stem cell technology in 2006, the number of scientific publications on this topic has constantly been increasi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deinsberger, Julia, Reisinger, David, Weber, Benedikt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7486930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32983575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41536-020-00100-4
_version_ 1783581404647391232
author Deinsberger, Julia
Reisinger, David
Weber, Benedikt
author_facet Deinsberger, Julia
Reisinger, David
Weber, Benedikt
author_sort Deinsberger, Julia
collection PubMed
description Pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) hold great potential for novel therapeutic approaches to regenerate or replace functionally impaired tissues. Since the introduction of the induced pluripotent stem cell technology in 2006, the number of scientific publications on this topic has constantly been increasing. However, so far no therapy based on PSCs has found its way into routine clinical use. In this study, we examined research trends related to clinical trials involving PSCs based on data obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov, the ICTRP database from the World Health Organization, as well as from a search of all individual databases that are included in the ICTRP using a multistep search algorithm. Following a stringent inclusion/exclusion procedure 131 studies remained that could be classified as clinical trials involving PSCs. The magnitude of these studies (77.1%) was observational, which implies that no cells were transplanted into patients, and only a minority of studies (22.9%) were of an interventional study type. The number of clinical trials involving induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs, 74.8%) was substantially higher than the one involving embryonic stem cells (ESCs, 25.2%). However, the picture changes completely when focusing on interventional studies, where in the majority (73.3%) of cases ESCs were used. Interestingly, also the study duration was significantly shorter for interventional versus observational trials (p = 0.002). When focusing on the geographical study regions, it became obvious that the greatest part of all observational trials was performed in the USA (41.6%) and in France (16.8%), while the magnitude of interventional studies was performed in Asian countries (China 36.7%, Japan 13.3%, South Korea 10.0%) and in the field of ophthalmology. In summary, these results indicate that only a limited number of trials were focusing on the actual transplantation of PSCs into patients in a rather narrow field of diagnoses. The future will tell us, if the iPSC technology will ultimately overcome the current challenges and will finally make its way into routine clinical use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7486930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74869302020-09-24 Global trends in clinical trials involving pluripotent stem cells: a systematic multi-database analysis Deinsberger, Julia Reisinger, David Weber, Benedikt NPJ Regen Med Article Pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) hold great potential for novel therapeutic approaches to regenerate or replace functionally impaired tissues. Since the introduction of the induced pluripotent stem cell technology in 2006, the number of scientific publications on this topic has constantly been increasing. However, so far no therapy based on PSCs has found its way into routine clinical use. In this study, we examined research trends related to clinical trials involving PSCs based on data obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov, the ICTRP database from the World Health Organization, as well as from a search of all individual databases that are included in the ICTRP using a multistep search algorithm. Following a stringent inclusion/exclusion procedure 131 studies remained that could be classified as clinical trials involving PSCs. The magnitude of these studies (77.1%) was observational, which implies that no cells were transplanted into patients, and only a minority of studies (22.9%) were of an interventional study type. The number of clinical trials involving induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs, 74.8%) was substantially higher than the one involving embryonic stem cells (ESCs, 25.2%). However, the picture changes completely when focusing on interventional studies, where in the majority (73.3%) of cases ESCs were used. Interestingly, also the study duration was significantly shorter for interventional versus observational trials (p = 0.002). When focusing on the geographical study regions, it became obvious that the greatest part of all observational trials was performed in the USA (41.6%) and in France (16.8%), while the magnitude of interventional studies was performed in Asian countries (China 36.7%, Japan 13.3%, South Korea 10.0%) and in the field of ophthalmology. In summary, these results indicate that only a limited number of trials were focusing on the actual transplantation of PSCs into patients in a rather narrow field of diagnoses. The future will tell us, if the iPSC technology will ultimately overcome the current challenges and will finally make its way into routine clinical use. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7486930/ /pubmed/32983575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41536-020-00100-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Deinsberger, Julia
Reisinger, David
Weber, Benedikt
Global trends in clinical trials involving pluripotent stem cells: a systematic multi-database analysis
title Global trends in clinical trials involving pluripotent stem cells: a systematic multi-database analysis
title_full Global trends in clinical trials involving pluripotent stem cells: a systematic multi-database analysis
title_fullStr Global trends in clinical trials involving pluripotent stem cells: a systematic multi-database analysis
title_full_unstemmed Global trends in clinical trials involving pluripotent stem cells: a systematic multi-database analysis
title_short Global trends in clinical trials involving pluripotent stem cells: a systematic multi-database analysis
title_sort global trends in clinical trials involving pluripotent stem cells: a systematic multi-database analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7486930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32983575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41536-020-00100-4
work_keys_str_mv AT deinsbergerjulia globaltrendsinclinicaltrialsinvolvingpluripotentstemcellsasystematicmultidatabaseanalysis
AT reisingerdavid globaltrendsinclinicaltrialsinvolvingpluripotentstemcellsasystematicmultidatabaseanalysis
AT weberbenedikt globaltrendsinclinicaltrialsinvolvingpluripotentstemcellsasystematicmultidatabaseanalysis