Cargando…

Platelet/lymphocyte ratio for prediction of no-reflow phenomenon in ST-elevation myocardial infarction managed with primary percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND: Coronary no-reflow phenomenon in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is associated with a poor clinical outcome. Although its pathophysiology is not fully understood, a deregulated systemic inflammatory response plays an important role. We aimed to explore the relationship...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Badran, Hala Mahfouz, Fatah, Ahmed Abdel, Soltan, Ghada
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7486979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32935070
http://dx.doi.org/10.18053/jctres.06.202001.004
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Coronary no-reflow phenomenon in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is associated with a poor clinical outcome. Although its pathophysiology is not fully understood, a deregulated systemic inflammatory response plays an important role. We aimed to explore the relationship between platelet\lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and no-reflow in patients with acute STEMI who were treated with a primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). METHODS: A total of 200 patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI were included in the study. Transthoracic echocardiographic examination was performed to assess left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and wall motion score index. Blood samples were assayed for platelet and lymphocyte count before PPCI. No-reflow was defined as coronary blood flow thrombolysis in myocardial infarction grade ≤II. RESULTS: No-reflow was observed in 58 (29%) of STEMI patients following PPCI. PLR was significantly higher in hypertensive patients compared to normotensive patients (144.7±91.6 vs. 109.1±47.1, respectively, P<0.001) and in the no-reflow group compared to the normal reflow group (214±93 vs. 101.6±51.3, respectively, P<0.0001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that PLR (β: 0.485, 95% CI: −0.006-0.001, P<0.002) and LV EF (β: 0.272, 95% CI: 0.009-0.034, P<0.001) were independent predictors of no-reflow after PPCI. CONCLUSION: Pre-procedural increase in PLR is predictive of the no-reflow phenomenon following PPCI in STEMI patients. RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS: No reflow phenomenon is an unfavorable complication following PPCI in patients with acute STEMI. High pre-procedural PLR is an independent predictor of reperfusion failure and helps to identify patients who require prophylactic treatment.