Cargando…

Use of Cesarean Birth among Robson Groups 2 and 4 at Mizan-Tepi University Hospital, Ethiopia

BACKGROUND: Primary cesarean birth rates were high among women who were either nulliparous (Group 2) or multiparous (Group 4) with a single, cephalic, term fetus who were induced, augmented, or underwent cesarean birth before labor in our study cohort. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this analysis was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harrison, Margo S., Liyew, Tewodros, Kirub, Ephrem, Teshome, Biruk, Jimenez-Zambrano, Andrea, Muldrow, Margaret, Yarinbab, Teklemariam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7487109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32952564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5620987
_version_ 1783581425041145856
author Harrison, Margo S.
Liyew, Tewodros
Kirub, Ephrem
Teshome, Biruk
Jimenez-Zambrano, Andrea
Muldrow, Margaret
Yarinbab, Teklemariam
author_facet Harrison, Margo S.
Liyew, Tewodros
Kirub, Ephrem
Teshome, Biruk
Jimenez-Zambrano, Andrea
Muldrow, Margaret
Yarinbab, Teklemariam
author_sort Harrison, Margo S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Primary cesarean birth rates were high among women who were either nulliparous (Group 2) or multiparous (Group 4) with a single, cephalic, term fetus who were induced, augmented, or underwent cesarean birth before labor in our study cohort. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this analysis was to determine what risk factors were associated with cesarean birth among Robson Groups 2 and 4. METHODS: This study was a prospective hospital-based cross-sectional analysis of a convenience sample of 1,000 women who delivered at Mizan-Tepi University Teaching Hospital in the summer and fall of 2019. RESULTS: Women in Robson Groups 2 and 4 comprised 11.4% (n = 113) of the total population (n = 993). The cesarean birth rate in Robson Group 2 (n = 56) was 37.5% and in Robson Group 4 (n = 57) was 24.6%. In Robson Group 2, of all prelabor cesareans (n = 5), one birth was elective cesarean by maternal request; the intrapartum cesarean births (n = 16) mostly had a maternal or fetal indication (93.8%), with one birth (6.2%) indicated by “failed induction or augmentation,” which was a combined indication. In Robson Group 4, all 4 women delivered by prelabor cesarean had a maternal indication (one was missing data), and 3 of the intrapartum cesareans were indicated by “failed induction or augmentation.” In multivariable modeling of Robson Group 2, having a labor duration of “not applicable” increased the risk of cesarean delivery (RR 2.9, CI (1.5, 5.4)). The odds of requiring maternal antibiotics was the only notable outcome with increased risk (RR 11.1, CI (1.9, 64.9)). In multivariable modeling of Robson Group 4, having a labor longer than 24 hours trended towards a significant association with cesarean (RR 3.6, CI (0.9, 14.3)), and women had a more dilated cervix on admission trended toward having a lower odds of cesarean (RR 0.8, CI (0.6, 1.0)). CONCLUSION: Though rates of primary cesarean birth among women who have a term, single, cephalic fetus and are induced, augmented, or undergone prelabor cesarean birth are high, those that occur intrapartum seem to be associated with appropriate risk factors and indications, though we cannot say this definitely as we did not perform an audit. More research is needed on the prelabor subgroup as a separate entity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7487109
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74871092020-09-17 Use of Cesarean Birth among Robson Groups 2 and 4 at Mizan-Tepi University Hospital, Ethiopia Harrison, Margo S. Liyew, Tewodros Kirub, Ephrem Teshome, Biruk Jimenez-Zambrano, Andrea Muldrow, Margaret Yarinbab, Teklemariam Obstet Gynecol Int Research Article BACKGROUND: Primary cesarean birth rates were high among women who were either nulliparous (Group 2) or multiparous (Group 4) with a single, cephalic, term fetus who were induced, augmented, or underwent cesarean birth before labor in our study cohort. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this analysis was to determine what risk factors were associated with cesarean birth among Robson Groups 2 and 4. METHODS: This study was a prospective hospital-based cross-sectional analysis of a convenience sample of 1,000 women who delivered at Mizan-Tepi University Teaching Hospital in the summer and fall of 2019. RESULTS: Women in Robson Groups 2 and 4 comprised 11.4% (n = 113) of the total population (n = 993). The cesarean birth rate in Robson Group 2 (n = 56) was 37.5% and in Robson Group 4 (n = 57) was 24.6%. In Robson Group 2, of all prelabor cesareans (n = 5), one birth was elective cesarean by maternal request; the intrapartum cesarean births (n = 16) mostly had a maternal or fetal indication (93.8%), with one birth (6.2%) indicated by “failed induction or augmentation,” which was a combined indication. In Robson Group 4, all 4 women delivered by prelabor cesarean had a maternal indication (one was missing data), and 3 of the intrapartum cesareans were indicated by “failed induction or augmentation.” In multivariable modeling of Robson Group 2, having a labor duration of “not applicable” increased the risk of cesarean delivery (RR 2.9, CI (1.5, 5.4)). The odds of requiring maternal antibiotics was the only notable outcome with increased risk (RR 11.1, CI (1.9, 64.9)). In multivariable modeling of Robson Group 4, having a labor longer than 24 hours trended towards a significant association with cesarean (RR 3.6, CI (0.9, 14.3)), and women had a more dilated cervix on admission trended toward having a lower odds of cesarean (RR 0.8, CI (0.6, 1.0)). CONCLUSION: Though rates of primary cesarean birth among women who have a term, single, cephalic fetus and are induced, augmented, or undergone prelabor cesarean birth are high, those that occur intrapartum seem to be associated with appropriate risk factors and indications, though we cannot say this definitely as we did not perform an audit. More research is needed on the prelabor subgroup as a separate entity. Hindawi 2020-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7487109/ /pubmed/32952564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5620987 Text en Copyright © 2020 Margo S. Harrison et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Harrison, Margo S.
Liyew, Tewodros
Kirub, Ephrem
Teshome, Biruk
Jimenez-Zambrano, Andrea
Muldrow, Margaret
Yarinbab, Teklemariam
Use of Cesarean Birth among Robson Groups 2 and 4 at Mizan-Tepi University Hospital, Ethiopia
title Use of Cesarean Birth among Robson Groups 2 and 4 at Mizan-Tepi University Hospital, Ethiopia
title_full Use of Cesarean Birth among Robson Groups 2 and 4 at Mizan-Tepi University Hospital, Ethiopia
title_fullStr Use of Cesarean Birth among Robson Groups 2 and 4 at Mizan-Tepi University Hospital, Ethiopia
title_full_unstemmed Use of Cesarean Birth among Robson Groups 2 and 4 at Mizan-Tepi University Hospital, Ethiopia
title_short Use of Cesarean Birth among Robson Groups 2 and 4 at Mizan-Tepi University Hospital, Ethiopia
title_sort use of cesarean birth among robson groups 2 and 4 at mizan-tepi university hospital, ethiopia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7487109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32952564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5620987
work_keys_str_mv AT harrisonmargos useofcesareanbirthamongrobsongroups2and4atmizantepiuniversityhospitalethiopia
AT liyewtewodros useofcesareanbirthamongrobsongroups2and4atmizantepiuniversityhospitalethiopia
AT kirubephrem useofcesareanbirthamongrobsongroups2and4atmizantepiuniversityhospitalethiopia
AT teshomebiruk useofcesareanbirthamongrobsongroups2and4atmizantepiuniversityhospitalethiopia
AT jimenezzambranoandrea useofcesareanbirthamongrobsongroups2and4atmizantepiuniversityhospitalethiopia
AT muldrowmargaret useofcesareanbirthamongrobsongroups2and4atmizantepiuniversityhospitalethiopia
AT yarinbabteklemariam useofcesareanbirthamongrobsongroups2and4atmizantepiuniversityhospitalethiopia