Cargando…

Comparison of Involved Field Radiotherapy versus Elective Nodal Irradiation in Stage IIIB/C Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma Patients Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: A Propensity Score Matching Study

BACKGROUND: We retrospectively compared the incidence of isolated elective nodal failure (IENF) and toxicity rates and survival outcomes after elective nodal irradiation (ENI) versus involved-field RT (IFRT) by employing the propensity score matching (PSM) methodology in stage IIIB/C inoperable non-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Topkan, Erkan, Ozdemir, Yurday, Guler, Ozan Cem, Kucuk, Ahmet, Besen, Ali Ayberk, Mertsoylu, Huseyin, Sezen, Duygu, Akdemir, Eyub Yasar, Sezer, Ahmet, Bolukbasi, Yasemin, Pehlivan, Berrin, Selek, Ugur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7487114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32952557
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/7083149
_version_ 1783581426202968064
author Topkan, Erkan
Ozdemir, Yurday
Guler, Ozan Cem
Kucuk, Ahmet
Besen, Ali Ayberk
Mertsoylu, Huseyin
Sezen, Duygu
Akdemir, Eyub Yasar
Sezer, Ahmet
Bolukbasi, Yasemin
Pehlivan, Berrin
Selek, Ugur
author_facet Topkan, Erkan
Ozdemir, Yurday
Guler, Ozan Cem
Kucuk, Ahmet
Besen, Ali Ayberk
Mertsoylu, Huseyin
Sezen, Duygu
Akdemir, Eyub Yasar
Sezer, Ahmet
Bolukbasi, Yasemin
Pehlivan, Berrin
Selek, Ugur
author_sort Topkan, Erkan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We retrospectively compared the incidence of isolated elective nodal failure (IENF) and toxicity rates and survival outcomes after elective nodal irradiation (ENI) versus involved-field RT (IFRT) by employing the propensity score matching (PSM) methodology in stage IIIB/C inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (C-CRT). METHODS: Our PSM examination included 1048 stage IIIB/C NSCLC patients treated with C-CRT from January 2007 to December 2016: a total dose of 66 Gy (2 Gy/fraction) radiotherapy and 1–3 cycles of platinum-based doublet chemotherapy concurrently. The primary and secondary endpoints were the IENF and toxicity rates and survival outcomes after ENI versus IFRT, respectively. Propensity scores were calculated for each group to adjust for confounding variables and facilitate well-balanced comparability by creating 1 : 1 matched study groups. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 26.4 months for the whole study accomplice. The PSM analysis unveiled 1 : 1 matched 646 patients for the ENI (N = 323) and IFRT (N = 323) cohorts. Intergroup comparisons discovered that the 5-year isolated ENF incidence rates (3.4% versus 4.3%; P=0.52) and median overall survival (25.2 versus 24.6 months; P=0.69), locoregional progression-free survival (15.3 versus 15.1 months; P=0.52), and progression-free survival (11.7 versus 11.2 months; P=0.57) durations were similar between the ENI and IFRT cohorts, separately. However, acute grade 3-4 leukopenia (P=0.0012), grade 3 nausea-vomiting (P=0.006), esophagitis (P=0.003), pneumonitis (P=0.002), late grade 3-4 esophageal toxicity (P=0.038), and the need for hospitalization (P < 0.001) were all significantly higher in the ENI than in the IFRT group, respectively. CONCLUSION: Results of the present large-scale PSM cohort established the absence of meaningful IENF or survival differences between the IFRT and ENI cohorts and, consequently, counseled the IFRT as the elected RT technique for such patients since ENI increased the toxicity rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7487114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74871142020-09-17 Comparison of Involved Field Radiotherapy versus Elective Nodal Irradiation in Stage IIIB/C Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma Patients Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: A Propensity Score Matching Study Topkan, Erkan Ozdemir, Yurday Guler, Ozan Cem Kucuk, Ahmet Besen, Ali Ayberk Mertsoylu, Huseyin Sezen, Duygu Akdemir, Eyub Yasar Sezer, Ahmet Bolukbasi, Yasemin Pehlivan, Berrin Selek, Ugur J Oncol Research Article BACKGROUND: We retrospectively compared the incidence of isolated elective nodal failure (IENF) and toxicity rates and survival outcomes after elective nodal irradiation (ENI) versus involved-field RT (IFRT) by employing the propensity score matching (PSM) methodology in stage IIIB/C inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (C-CRT). METHODS: Our PSM examination included 1048 stage IIIB/C NSCLC patients treated with C-CRT from January 2007 to December 2016: a total dose of 66 Gy (2 Gy/fraction) radiotherapy and 1–3 cycles of platinum-based doublet chemotherapy concurrently. The primary and secondary endpoints were the IENF and toxicity rates and survival outcomes after ENI versus IFRT, respectively. Propensity scores were calculated for each group to adjust for confounding variables and facilitate well-balanced comparability by creating 1 : 1 matched study groups. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 26.4 months for the whole study accomplice. The PSM analysis unveiled 1 : 1 matched 646 patients for the ENI (N = 323) and IFRT (N = 323) cohorts. Intergroup comparisons discovered that the 5-year isolated ENF incidence rates (3.4% versus 4.3%; P=0.52) and median overall survival (25.2 versus 24.6 months; P=0.69), locoregional progression-free survival (15.3 versus 15.1 months; P=0.52), and progression-free survival (11.7 versus 11.2 months; P=0.57) durations were similar between the ENI and IFRT cohorts, separately. However, acute grade 3-4 leukopenia (P=0.0012), grade 3 nausea-vomiting (P=0.006), esophagitis (P=0.003), pneumonitis (P=0.002), late grade 3-4 esophageal toxicity (P=0.038), and the need for hospitalization (P < 0.001) were all significantly higher in the ENI than in the IFRT group, respectively. CONCLUSION: Results of the present large-scale PSM cohort established the absence of meaningful IENF or survival differences between the IFRT and ENI cohorts and, consequently, counseled the IFRT as the elected RT technique for such patients since ENI increased the toxicity rates. Hindawi 2020-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7487114/ /pubmed/32952557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/7083149 Text en Copyright © 2020 Erkan Topkan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Topkan, Erkan
Ozdemir, Yurday
Guler, Ozan Cem
Kucuk, Ahmet
Besen, Ali Ayberk
Mertsoylu, Huseyin
Sezen, Duygu
Akdemir, Eyub Yasar
Sezer, Ahmet
Bolukbasi, Yasemin
Pehlivan, Berrin
Selek, Ugur
Comparison of Involved Field Radiotherapy versus Elective Nodal Irradiation in Stage IIIB/C Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma Patients Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: A Propensity Score Matching Study
title Comparison of Involved Field Radiotherapy versus Elective Nodal Irradiation in Stage IIIB/C Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma Patients Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: A Propensity Score Matching Study
title_full Comparison of Involved Field Radiotherapy versus Elective Nodal Irradiation in Stage IIIB/C Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma Patients Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: A Propensity Score Matching Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Involved Field Radiotherapy versus Elective Nodal Irradiation in Stage IIIB/C Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma Patients Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: A Propensity Score Matching Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Involved Field Radiotherapy versus Elective Nodal Irradiation in Stage IIIB/C Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma Patients Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: A Propensity Score Matching Study
title_short Comparison of Involved Field Radiotherapy versus Elective Nodal Irradiation in Stage IIIB/C Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma Patients Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: A Propensity Score Matching Study
title_sort comparison of involved field radiotherapy versus elective nodal irradiation in stage iiib/c non-small-cell lung carcinoma patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a propensity score matching study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7487114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32952557
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/7083149
work_keys_str_mv AT topkanerkan comparisonofinvolvedfieldradiotherapyversuselectivenodalirradiationinstageiiibcnonsmallcelllungcarcinomapatientstreatedwithconcurrentchemoradiotherapyapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT ozdemiryurday comparisonofinvolvedfieldradiotherapyversuselectivenodalirradiationinstageiiibcnonsmallcelllungcarcinomapatientstreatedwithconcurrentchemoradiotherapyapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT gulerozancem comparisonofinvolvedfieldradiotherapyversuselectivenodalirradiationinstageiiibcnonsmallcelllungcarcinomapatientstreatedwithconcurrentchemoradiotherapyapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT kucukahmet comparisonofinvolvedfieldradiotherapyversuselectivenodalirradiationinstageiiibcnonsmallcelllungcarcinomapatientstreatedwithconcurrentchemoradiotherapyapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT besenaliayberk comparisonofinvolvedfieldradiotherapyversuselectivenodalirradiationinstageiiibcnonsmallcelllungcarcinomapatientstreatedwithconcurrentchemoradiotherapyapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT mertsoyluhuseyin comparisonofinvolvedfieldradiotherapyversuselectivenodalirradiationinstageiiibcnonsmallcelllungcarcinomapatientstreatedwithconcurrentchemoradiotherapyapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT sezenduygu comparisonofinvolvedfieldradiotherapyversuselectivenodalirradiationinstageiiibcnonsmallcelllungcarcinomapatientstreatedwithconcurrentchemoradiotherapyapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT akdemireyubyasar comparisonofinvolvedfieldradiotherapyversuselectivenodalirradiationinstageiiibcnonsmallcelllungcarcinomapatientstreatedwithconcurrentchemoradiotherapyapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT sezerahmet comparisonofinvolvedfieldradiotherapyversuselectivenodalirradiationinstageiiibcnonsmallcelllungcarcinomapatientstreatedwithconcurrentchemoradiotherapyapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT bolukbasiyasemin comparisonofinvolvedfieldradiotherapyversuselectivenodalirradiationinstageiiibcnonsmallcelllungcarcinomapatientstreatedwithconcurrentchemoradiotherapyapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT pehlivanberrin comparisonofinvolvedfieldradiotherapyversuselectivenodalirradiationinstageiiibcnonsmallcelllungcarcinomapatientstreatedwithconcurrentchemoradiotherapyapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT selekugur comparisonofinvolvedfieldradiotherapyversuselectivenodalirradiationinstageiiibcnonsmallcelllungcarcinomapatientstreatedwithconcurrentchemoradiotherapyapropensityscorematchingstudy