Cargando…
Left ventricular speckle tracking echocardiographic evaluation before and after TAVI
AIMS: To assess left ventricular (LV) function before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using conventional echocardiographic parameters and global longitudinal LV strain (GLS) and compare outcomes between Edwards S3 and Evolut R valves. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were collected...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bioscientifica Ltd
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7487179/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36472209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/ERP-20-0009 |
_version_ | 1783581438301437952 |
---|---|
author | Tsampasian, Vasiliki Panoulas, Vasileios Jabbour, Richard J Ruparelia, Neil Malik, Iqbal S Hadjiloizou, Nearchos Frame MSc, Angela Sen, Sayan Sutaria, Nilesh Mikhail, Ghada W Nihoyannopoulos, Petros |
author_facet | Tsampasian, Vasiliki Panoulas, Vasileios Jabbour, Richard J Ruparelia, Neil Malik, Iqbal S Hadjiloizou, Nearchos Frame MSc, Angela Sen, Sayan Sutaria, Nilesh Mikhail, Ghada W Nihoyannopoulos, Petros |
author_sort | Tsampasian, Vasiliki |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: To assess left ventricular (LV) function before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using conventional echocardiographic parameters and global longitudinal LV strain (GLS) and compare outcomes between Edwards S3 and Evolut R valves. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were collected for consecutive patients undergoing TAVI at Hammersmith hospital between 2015 and 2018. Of the 303 patients, those with coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation were excluded leading to a total of 85 patients, which constituted our study group. The mean follow-up was 49 ± 39 days. In total, 60% of patients were treated with Edwards S3 and 40% Evolut R. TAVI resulted in an early improvement of GLS (−13.96 to −15.25%, P = 0.01) but not ejection fraction (EF) (47.6 to 50.1%, P = 0.09). LV mass also improved, especially in patients with marked baseline LV hypertrophy (P < 0.001). There were no appreciable differences of LV function improvement and overall LV remodelling after TAVI between the two types of valves used (P = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: TAVI results in reverse remodelling and improvement of GLS, especially in patients with impaired baseline LV function. There were no differences in the extent of LV function improvement between Edwards S3 and Evolut R valves but there was a greater incidence of aortic regurgitation with Evolut R. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7487179 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Bioscientifica Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74871792020-09-16 Left ventricular speckle tracking echocardiographic evaluation before and after TAVI Tsampasian, Vasiliki Panoulas, Vasileios Jabbour, Richard J Ruparelia, Neil Malik, Iqbal S Hadjiloizou, Nearchos Frame MSc, Angela Sen, Sayan Sutaria, Nilesh Mikhail, Ghada W Nihoyannopoulos, Petros Echo Res Pract Research AIMS: To assess left ventricular (LV) function before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using conventional echocardiographic parameters and global longitudinal LV strain (GLS) and compare outcomes between Edwards S3 and Evolut R valves. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were collected for consecutive patients undergoing TAVI at Hammersmith hospital between 2015 and 2018. Of the 303 patients, those with coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation were excluded leading to a total of 85 patients, which constituted our study group. The mean follow-up was 49 ± 39 days. In total, 60% of patients were treated with Edwards S3 and 40% Evolut R. TAVI resulted in an early improvement of GLS (−13.96 to −15.25%, P = 0.01) but not ejection fraction (EF) (47.6 to 50.1%, P = 0.09). LV mass also improved, especially in patients with marked baseline LV hypertrophy (P < 0.001). There were no appreciable differences of LV function improvement and overall LV remodelling after TAVI between the two types of valves used (P = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: TAVI results in reverse remodelling and improvement of GLS, especially in patients with impaired baseline LV function. There were no differences in the extent of LV function improvement between Edwards S3 and Evolut R valves but there was a greater incidence of aortic regurgitation with Evolut R. Bioscientifica Ltd 2020-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7487179/ /pubmed/36472209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/ERP-20-0009 Text en © 2020 The British Society of Echocardiography http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Tsampasian, Vasiliki Panoulas, Vasileios Jabbour, Richard J Ruparelia, Neil Malik, Iqbal S Hadjiloizou, Nearchos Frame MSc, Angela Sen, Sayan Sutaria, Nilesh Mikhail, Ghada W Nihoyannopoulos, Petros Left ventricular speckle tracking echocardiographic evaluation before and after TAVI |
title | Left ventricular speckle tracking echocardiographic evaluation before and after TAVI |
title_full | Left ventricular speckle tracking echocardiographic evaluation before and after TAVI |
title_fullStr | Left ventricular speckle tracking echocardiographic evaluation before and after TAVI |
title_full_unstemmed | Left ventricular speckle tracking echocardiographic evaluation before and after TAVI |
title_short | Left ventricular speckle tracking echocardiographic evaluation before and after TAVI |
title_sort | left ventricular speckle tracking echocardiographic evaluation before and after tavi |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7487179/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36472209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/ERP-20-0009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tsampasianvasiliki leftventricularspeckletrackingechocardiographicevaluationbeforeandaftertavi AT panoulasvasileios leftventricularspeckletrackingechocardiographicevaluationbeforeandaftertavi AT jabbourrichardj leftventricularspeckletrackingechocardiographicevaluationbeforeandaftertavi AT ruparelianeil leftventricularspeckletrackingechocardiographicevaluationbeforeandaftertavi AT malikiqbals leftventricularspeckletrackingechocardiographicevaluationbeforeandaftertavi AT hadjiloizounearchos leftventricularspeckletrackingechocardiographicevaluationbeforeandaftertavi AT framemscangela leftventricularspeckletrackingechocardiographicevaluationbeforeandaftertavi AT sensayan leftventricularspeckletrackingechocardiographicevaluationbeforeandaftertavi AT sutarianilesh leftventricularspeckletrackingechocardiographicevaluationbeforeandaftertavi AT mikhailghadaw leftventricularspeckletrackingechocardiographicevaluationbeforeandaftertavi AT nihoyannopoulospetros leftventricularspeckletrackingechocardiographicevaluationbeforeandaftertavi |