Cargando…

Left ventricular speckle tracking echocardiographic evaluation before and after TAVI

AIMS: To assess left ventricular (LV) function before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using conventional echocardiographic parameters and global longitudinal LV strain (GLS) and compare outcomes between Edwards S3 and Evolut R valves. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were collected...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsampasian, Vasiliki, Panoulas, Vasileios, Jabbour, Richard J, Ruparelia, Neil, Malik, Iqbal S, Hadjiloizou, Nearchos, Frame MSc, Angela, Sen, Sayan, Sutaria, Nilesh, Mikhail, Ghada W, Nihoyannopoulos, Petros
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bioscientifica Ltd 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7487179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36472209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/ERP-20-0009
_version_ 1783581438301437952
author Tsampasian, Vasiliki
Panoulas, Vasileios
Jabbour, Richard J
Ruparelia, Neil
Malik, Iqbal S
Hadjiloizou, Nearchos
Frame MSc, Angela
Sen, Sayan
Sutaria, Nilesh
Mikhail, Ghada W
Nihoyannopoulos, Petros
author_facet Tsampasian, Vasiliki
Panoulas, Vasileios
Jabbour, Richard J
Ruparelia, Neil
Malik, Iqbal S
Hadjiloizou, Nearchos
Frame MSc, Angela
Sen, Sayan
Sutaria, Nilesh
Mikhail, Ghada W
Nihoyannopoulos, Petros
author_sort Tsampasian, Vasiliki
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To assess left ventricular (LV) function before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using conventional echocardiographic parameters and global longitudinal LV strain (GLS) and compare outcomes between Edwards S3 and Evolut R valves. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were collected for consecutive patients undergoing TAVI at Hammersmith hospital between 2015 and 2018. Of the 303 patients, those with coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation were excluded leading to a total of 85 patients, which constituted our study group. The mean follow-up was 49 ± 39 days. In total, 60% of patients were treated with Edwards S3 and 40% Evolut R. TAVI resulted in an early improvement of GLS (−13.96 to −15.25%, P = 0.01) but not ejection fraction (EF) (47.6 to 50.1%, P = 0.09). LV mass also improved, especially in patients with marked baseline LV hypertrophy (P < 0.001). There were no appreciable differences of LV function improvement and overall LV remodelling after TAVI between the two types of valves used (P = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: TAVI results in reverse remodelling and improvement of GLS, especially in patients with impaired baseline LV function. There were no differences in the extent of LV function improvement between Edwards S3 and Evolut R valves but there was a greater incidence of aortic regurgitation with Evolut R.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7487179
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Bioscientifica Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74871792020-09-16 Left ventricular speckle tracking echocardiographic evaluation before and after TAVI Tsampasian, Vasiliki Panoulas, Vasileios Jabbour, Richard J Ruparelia, Neil Malik, Iqbal S Hadjiloizou, Nearchos Frame MSc, Angela Sen, Sayan Sutaria, Nilesh Mikhail, Ghada W Nihoyannopoulos, Petros Echo Res Pract Research AIMS: To assess left ventricular (LV) function before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using conventional echocardiographic parameters and global longitudinal LV strain (GLS) and compare outcomes between Edwards S3 and Evolut R valves. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were collected for consecutive patients undergoing TAVI at Hammersmith hospital between 2015 and 2018. Of the 303 patients, those with coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation were excluded leading to a total of 85 patients, which constituted our study group. The mean follow-up was 49 ± 39 days. In total, 60% of patients were treated with Edwards S3 and 40% Evolut R. TAVI resulted in an early improvement of GLS (−13.96 to −15.25%, P = 0.01) but not ejection fraction (EF) (47.6 to 50.1%, P = 0.09). LV mass also improved, especially in patients with marked baseline LV hypertrophy (P < 0.001). There were no appreciable differences of LV function improvement and overall LV remodelling after TAVI between the two types of valves used (P = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: TAVI results in reverse remodelling and improvement of GLS, especially in patients with impaired baseline LV function. There were no differences in the extent of LV function improvement between Edwards S3 and Evolut R valves but there was a greater incidence of aortic regurgitation with Evolut R. Bioscientifica Ltd 2020-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7487179/ /pubmed/36472209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/ERP-20-0009 Text en © 2020 The British Society of Echocardiography http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Tsampasian, Vasiliki
Panoulas, Vasileios
Jabbour, Richard J
Ruparelia, Neil
Malik, Iqbal S
Hadjiloizou, Nearchos
Frame MSc, Angela
Sen, Sayan
Sutaria, Nilesh
Mikhail, Ghada W
Nihoyannopoulos, Petros
Left ventricular speckle tracking echocardiographic evaluation before and after TAVI
title Left ventricular speckle tracking echocardiographic evaluation before and after TAVI
title_full Left ventricular speckle tracking echocardiographic evaluation before and after TAVI
title_fullStr Left ventricular speckle tracking echocardiographic evaluation before and after TAVI
title_full_unstemmed Left ventricular speckle tracking echocardiographic evaluation before and after TAVI
title_short Left ventricular speckle tracking echocardiographic evaluation before and after TAVI
title_sort left ventricular speckle tracking echocardiographic evaluation before and after tavi
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7487179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36472209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/ERP-20-0009
work_keys_str_mv AT tsampasianvasiliki leftventricularspeckletrackingechocardiographicevaluationbeforeandaftertavi
AT panoulasvasileios leftventricularspeckletrackingechocardiographicevaluationbeforeandaftertavi
AT jabbourrichardj leftventricularspeckletrackingechocardiographicevaluationbeforeandaftertavi
AT ruparelianeil leftventricularspeckletrackingechocardiographicevaluationbeforeandaftertavi
AT malikiqbals leftventricularspeckletrackingechocardiographicevaluationbeforeandaftertavi
AT hadjiloizounearchos leftventricularspeckletrackingechocardiographicevaluationbeforeandaftertavi
AT framemscangela leftventricularspeckletrackingechocardiographicevaluationbeforeandaftertavi
AT sensayan leftventricularspeckletrackingechocardiographicevaluationbeforeandaftertavi
AT sutarianilesh leftventricularspeckletrackingechocardiographicevaluationbeforeandaftertavi
AT mikhailghadaw leftventricularspeckletrackingechocardiographicevaluationbeforeandaftertavi
AT nihoyannopoulospetros leftventricularspeckletrackingechocardiographicevaluationbeforeandaftertavi