Cargando…
Power of a dual‐use SNP panel for pedigree reconstruction and population assignment
The use of high‐throughput, low‐density sequencing approaches has dramatically increased in recent years in studies of eco‐evolutionary processes in wild populations and domestication in commercial aquaculture. Most of these studies focus on identifying panels of SNP loci for a single downstream app...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7487233/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32953080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6645 |
_version_ | 1783581449415294976 |
---|---|
author | May, Samuel A. McKinney, Garrett J. Hilborn, Ray Hauser, Lorenz Naish, Kerry A. |
author_facet | May, Samuel A. McKinney, Garrett J. Hilborn, Ray Hauser, Lorenz Naish, Kerry A. |
author_sort | May, Samuel A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The use of high‐throughput, low‐density sequencing approaches has dramatically increased in recent years in studies of eco‐evolutionary processes in wild populations and domestication in commercial aquaculture. Most of these studies focus on identifying panels of SNP loci for a single downstream application, whereas there have been few studies examining the trade‐offs for selecting panels of markers for use in multiple applications. Here, we detail the use of a bioinformatic workflow for the development of a dual‐purpose SNP panel for parentage and population assignment, which included identifying putative SNP loci, filtering for the most informative loci for the two tasks, designing effective multiplex PCR primers, optimizing the SNP panel for performance, and performing quality control steps for downstream applications. We applied this workflow to two adjacent Alaskan Sockeye Salmon populations and identified a GTseq panel of 142 SNP loci for parentage and 35 SNP loci for population assignment. Only 50–75 panel loci were necessary for >95% accurate parentage, whereas population assignment success, with all 172 panel loci, ranged from 93.9% to 96.2%. Finally, we discuss the trade‐offs and complexities of the decision‐making process that drives SNP panel development, optimization, and testing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7487233 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74872332020-09-18 Power of a dual‐use SNP panel for pedigree reconstruction and population assignment May, Samuel A. McKinney, Garrett J. Hilborn, Ray Hauser, Lorenz Naish, Kerry A. Ecol Evol Original Research The use of high‐throughput, low‐density sequencing approaches has dramatically increased in recent years in studies of eco‐evolutionary processes in wild populations and domestication in commercial aquaculture. Most of these studies focus on identifying panels of SNP loci for a single downstream application, whereas there have been few studies examining the trade‐offs for selecting panels of markers for use in multiple applications. Here, we detail the use of a bioinformatic workflow for the development of a dual‐purpose SNP panel for parentage and population assignment, which included identifying putative SNP loci, filtering for the most informative loci for the two tasks, designing effective multiplex PCR primers, optimizing the SNP panel for performance, and performing quality control steps for downstream applications. We applied this workflow to two adjacent Alaskan Sockeye Salmon populations and identified a GTseq panel of 142 SNP loci for parentage and 35 SNP loci for population assignment. Only 50–75 panel loci were necessary for >95% accurate parentage, whereas population assignment success, with all 172 panel loci, ranged from 93.9% to 96.2%. Finally, we discuss the trade‐offs and complexities of the decision‐making process that drives SNP panel development, optimization, and testing. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7487233/ /pubmed/32953080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6645 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research May, Samuel A. McKinney, Garrett J. Hilborn, Ray Hauser, Lorenz Naish, Kerry A. Power of a dual‐use SNP panel for pedigree reconstruction and population assignment |
title | Power of a dual‐use SNP panel for pedigree reconstruction and population assignment |
title_full | Power of a dual‐use SNP panel for pedigree reconstruction and population assignment |
title_fullStr | Power of a dual‐use SNP panel for pedigree reconstruction and population assignment |
title_full_unstemmed | Power of a dual‐use SNP panel for pedigree reconstruction and population assignment |
title_short | Power of a dual‐use SNP panel for pedigree reconstruction and population assignment |
title_sort | power of a dual‐use snp panel for pedigree reconstruction and population assignment |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7487233/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32953080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6645 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maysamuela powerofadualusesnppanelforpedigreereconstructionandpopulationassignment AT mckinneygarrettj powerofadualusesnppanelforpedigreereconstructionandpopulationassignment AT hilbornray powerofadualusesnppanelforpedigreereconstructionandpopulationassignment AT hauserlorenz powerofadualusesnppanelforpedigreereconstructionandpopulationassignment AT naishkerrya powerofadualusesnppanelforpedigreereconstructionandpopulationassignment |