Cargando…

Power of a dual‐use SNP panel for pedigree reconstruction and population assignment

The use of high‐throughput, low‐density sequencing approaches has dramatically increased in recent years in studies of eco‐evolutionary processes in wild populations and domestication in commercial aquaculture. Most of these studies focus on identifying panels of SNP loci for a single downstream app...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: May, Samuel A., McKinney, Garrett J., Hilborn, Ray, Hauser, Lorenz, Naish, Kerry A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7487233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32953080
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6645
_version_ 1783581449415294976
author May, Samuel A.
McKinney, Garrett J.
Hilborn, Ray
Hauser, Lorenz
Naish, Kerry A.
author_facet May, Samuel A.
McKinney, Garrett J.
Hilborn, Ray
Hauser, Lorenz
Naish, Kerry A.
author_sort May, Samuel A.
collection PubMed
description The use of high‐throughput, low‐density sequencing approaches has dramatically increased in recent years in studies of eco‐evolutionary processes in wild populations and domestication in commercial aquaculture. Most of these studies focus on identifying panels of SNP loci for a single downstream application, whereas there have been few studies examining the trade‐offs for selecting panels of markers for use in multiple applications. Here, we detail the use of a bioinformatic workflow for the development of a dual‐purpose SNP panel for parentage and population assignment, which included identifying putative SNP loci, filtering for the most informative loci for the two tasks, designing effective multiplex PCR primers, optimizing the SNP panel for performance, and performing quality control steps for downstream applications. We applied this workflow to two adjacent Alaskan Sockeye Salmon populations and identified a GTseq panel of 142 SNP loci for parentage and 35 SNP loci for population assignment. Only 50–75 panel loci were necessary for >95% accurate parentage, whereas population assignment success, with all 172 panel loci, ranged from 93.9% to 96.2%. Finally, we discuss the trade‐offs and complexities of the decision‐making process that drives SNP panel development, optimization, and testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7487233
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74872332020-09-18 Power of a dual‐use SNP panel for pedigree reconstruction and population assignment May, Samuel A. McKinney, Garrett J. Hilborn, Ray Hauser, Lorenz Naish, Kerry A. Ecol Evol Original Research The use of high‐throughput, low‐density sequencing approaches has dramatically increased in recent years in studies of eco‐evolutionary processes in wild populations and domestication in commercial aquaculture. Most of these studies focus on identifying panels of SNP loci for a single downstream application, whereas there have been few studies examining the trade‐offs for selecting panels of markers for use in multiple applications. Here, we detail the use of a bioinformatic workflow for the development of a dual‐purpose SNP panel for parentage and population assignment, which included identifying putative SNP loci, filtering for the most informative loci for the two tasks, designing effective multiplex PCR primers, optimizing the SNP panel for performance, and performing quality control steps for downstream applications. We applied this workflow to two adjacent Alaskan Sockeye Salmon populations and identified a GTseq panel of 142 SNP loci for parentage and 35 SNP loci for population assignment. Only 50–75 panel loci were necessary for >95% accurate parentage, whereas population assignment success, with all 172 panel loci, ranged from 93.9% to 96.2%. Finally, we discuss the trade‐offs and complexities of the decision‐making process that drives SNP panel development, optimization, and testing. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7487233/ /pubmed/32953080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6645 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
May, Samuel A.
McKinney, Garrett J.
Hilborn, Ray
Hauser, Lorenz
Naish, Kerry A.
Power of a dual‐use SNP panel for pedigree reconstruction and population assignment
title Power of a dual‐use SNP panel for pedigree reconstruction and population assignment
title_full Power of a dual‐use SNP panel for pedigree reconstruction and population assignment
title_fullStr Power of a dual‐use SNP panel for pedigree reconstruction and population assignment
title_full_unstemmed Power of a dual‐use SNP panel for pedigree reconstruction and population assignment
title_short Power of a dual‐use SNP panel for pedigree reconstruction and population assignment
title_sort power of a dual‐use snp panel for pedigree reconstruction and population assignment
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7487233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32953080
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6645
work_keys_str_mv AT maysamuela powerofadualusesnppanelforpedigreereconstructionandpopulationassignment
AT mckinneygarrettj powerofadualusesnppanelforpedigreereconstructionandpopulationassignment
AT hilbornray powerofadualusesnppanelforpedigreereconstructionandpopulationassignment
AT hauserlorenz powerofadualusesnppanelforpedigreereconstructionandpopulationassignment
AT naishkerrya powerofadualusesnppanelforpedigreereconstructionandpopulationassignment