Cargando…
Finite element modeling of proximal femur with quantifiable weight-bearing area in standing position
BACKGROUND: The positional distribution and size of the weight-bearing area of the femoral head in the standing position as well as the direct active surface of joint force can directly affect the result of finite element (FE) stress analysis. However, the division of this area was vague, imprecise,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7487488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32887611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01927-9 |
_version_ | 1783581496329633792 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Peng Lin, Tian-Ye Xu, Jing-Li Zeng, Hui-Yu Chen, Da Xiong, Bing-Lang Pang, Feng-Xiang Chen, Zhen-Qiu He, Wei Wei, Qiu-Shi Zhang, Qing-Wen |
author_facet | Yang, Peng Lin, Tian-Ye Xu, Jing-Li Zeng, Hui-Yu Chen, Da Xiong, Bing-Lang Pang, Feng-Xiang Chen, Zhen-Qiu He, Wei Wei, Qiu-Shi Zhang, Qing-Wen |
author_sort | Yang, Peng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The positional distribution and size of the weight-bearing area of the femoral head in the standing position as well as the direct active surface of joint force can directly affect the result of finite element (FE) stress analysis. However, the division of this area was vague, imprecise, and un-individualized in most studies related to separate FE models of the femur. The purpose of this study was to quantify the positional distribution and size of the weight-bearing area of the femoral head in standing position by a set of simple methods, to realize individualized reconstruction of the proximal femur FE model. METHODS: Five adult volunteers were recruited for an X-ray and CT examination in the same simulated bipedal standing position with a specialized patented device. We extracted these image data, calculated the 2D weight-bearing area on the X-ray image, reconstructed the 3D model of the proximal femur based on CT data, and registered them to realize the 2D weight-bearing area to 3D transformation as the quantified weight-bearing surface. One of the 3D models of the proximal femur was randomly selected for finite element analysis (FEA), and we defined three different loading surfaces and compared their FEA results. RESULTS: A total of 10 weight-bearing surfaces in 5 volunteers were constructed, and they were mainly distributed on the dome and anterolateral of the femoral head with a crescent shape, in the range of 1218.63–1,871.06 mm(2). The results of FEA showed that stress magnitude and distribution in proximal femur FE models among three different loading conditions had significant differences, and the loading case with the quantized weight-bearing area was more in accordance with the physical phenomenon of the hip. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed an effective FE modeling method of the proximal femur, which can quantify the weight-bearing area to define a more reasonable load surface setting without increasing the actual modeling difficulty. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7487488 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74874882020-09-15 Finite element modeling of proximal femur with quantifiable weight-bearing area in standing position Yang, Peng Lin, Tian-Ye Xu, Jing-Li Zeng, Hui-Yu Chen, Da Xiong, Bing-Lang Pang, Feng-Xiang Chen, Zhen-Qiu He, Wei Wei, Qiu-Shi Zhang, Qing-Wen J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The positional distribution and size of the weight-bearing area of the femoral head in the standing position as well as the direct active surface of joint force can directly affect the result of finite element (FE) stress analysis. However, the division of this area was vague, imprecise, and un-individualized in most studies related to separate FE models of the femur. The purpose of this study was to quantify the positional distribution and size of the weight-bearing area of the femoral head in standing position by a set of simple methods, to realize individualized reconstruction of the proximal femur FE model. METHODS: Five adult volunteers were recruited for an X-ray and CT examination in the same simulated bipedal standing position with a specialized patented device. We extracted these image data, calculated the 2D weight-bearing area on the X-ray image, reconstructed the 3D model of the proximal femur based on CT data, and registered them to realize the 2D weight-bearing area to 3D transformation as the quantified weight-bearing surface. One of the 3D models of the proximal femur was randomly selected for finite element analysis (FEA), and we defined three different loading surfaces and compared their FEA results. RESULTS: A total of 10 weight-bearing surfaces in 5 volunteers were constructed, and they were mainly distributed on the dome and anterolateral of the femoral head with a crescent shape, in the range of 1218.63–1,871.06 mm(2). The results of FEA showed that stress magnitude and distribution in proximal femur FE models among three different loading conditions had significant differences, and the loading case with the quantized weight-bearing area was more in accordance with the physical phenomenon of the hip. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed an effective FE modeling method of the proximal femur, which can quantify the weight-bearing area to define a more reasonable load surface setting without increasing the actual modeling difficulty. BioMed Central 2020-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7487488/ /pubmed/32887611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01927-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yang, Peng Lin, Tian-Ye Xu, Jing-Li Zeng, Hui-Yu Chen, Da Xiong, Bing-Lang Pang, Feng-Xiang Chen, Zhen-Qiu He, Wei Wei, Qiu-Shi Zhang, Qing-Wen Finite element modeling of proximal femur with quantifiable weight-bearing area in standing position |
title | Finite element modeling of proximal femur with quantifiable weight-bearing area in standing position |
title_full | Finite element modeling of proximal femur with quantifiable weight-bearing area in standing position |
title_fullStr | Finite element modeling of proximal femur with quantifiable weight-bearing area in standing position |
title_full_unstemmed | Finite element modeling of proximal femur with quantifiable weight-bearing area in standing position |
title_short | Finite element modeling of proximal femur with quantifiable weight-bearing area in standing position |
title_sort | finite element modeling of proximal femur with quantifiable weight-bearing area in standing position |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7487488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32887611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01927-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangpeng finiteelementmodelingofproximalfemurwithquantifiableweightbearingareainstandingposition AT lintianye finiteelementmodelingofproximalfemurwithquantifiableweightbearingareainstandingposition AT xujingli finiteelementmodelingofproximalfemurwithquantifiableweightbearingareainstandingposition AT zenghuiyu finiteelementmodelingofproximalfemurwithquantifiableweightbearingareainstandingposition AT chenda finiteelementmodelingofproximalfemurwithquantifiableweightbearingareainstandingposition AT xiongbinglang finiteelementmodelingofproximalfemurwithquantifiableweightbearingareainstandingposition AT pangfengxiang finiteelementmodelingofproximalfemurwithquantifiableweightbearingareainstandingposition AT chenzhenqiu finiteelementmodelingofproximalfemurwithquantifiableweightbearingareainstandingposition AT hewei finiteelementmodelingofproximalfemurwithquantifiableweightbearingareainstandingposition AT weiqiushi finiteelementmodelingofproximalfemurwithquantifiableweightbearingareainstandingposition AT zhangqingwen finiteelementmodelingofproximalfemurwithquantifiableweightbearingareainstandingposition |