Cargando…

UKCAT and medical student selection in the UK – what has changed since 2006?

BACKGROUND: The United Kingdom Clinical Aptitude Test (UKCAT) is an aptitude test used since 2006 within selection processes of a consortium of UK medical and dental schools. Since 2006, student numbers have increased in medical training and schools now have an increased focus on widening access. A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Greatrix, Rachel, Dowell, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7487558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32891164
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02214-1
_version_ 1783581511475265536
author Greatrix, Rachel
Dowell, Jonathan
author_facet Greatrix, Rachel
Dowell, Jonathan
author_sort Greatrix, Rachel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The United Kingdom Clinical Aptitude Test (UKCAT) is an aptitude test used since 2006 within selection processes of a consortium of UK medical and dental schools. Since 2006, student numbers have increased in medical training and schools now have an increased focus on widening access. A growing evidence base has emerged around medical student selection (Patterson et al., Med Educ 50:36–60, 2016) leading to changes in practice. However, whilst some papers describe local selection processes, there has been no overview of trends in selection processes over time across Universities. This study reports on how the use of the UKCAT in medical student selection has changed and comments on other changes in selection processes. METHODS: Telephone interviews were conducted annually with UKCAT Consortium medical schools. Use of the UKCAT was categorised and data analysed to identify trends over time. RESULTS: The number of schools using the UKCAT to select applicants for interview has risen, with cognitive test results contributing significantly to outcomes at this stage at many universities. Where schools use different weighted criteria (Factor Method), the UKCAT has largely replaced the use of personal statements. Use of the test at offer stage has also increased; the most significant use being to discriminate between applicants at a decision borderline. A growing number of schools are using the UKCAT Situational Judgement Test (SJT) in selection. In 2018, all but seven (out of 26) schools made some adjustment to selection processes for widening access applicants. Multiple Mini Interviews (MMIs) are now used by the majority of schools. Whilst medical student numbers have increased over this time, the ratio of applicants to places has fallen. The probability of applicants being invited to interview or receiving an offer has increased. CONCLUSIONS: More medical schools are using the UKCAT in undergraduate selection processes in an increasing number of ways and with increasing weight compared with 2007. It has replaced the use of personal statements in all but a few Consortium medical schools. An increased focus on academic attainment and the UKCAT across medical schools may be leading to the need for schools to interview and make offers to more applicants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7487558
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74875582020-09-15 UKCAT and medical student selection in the UK – what has changed since 2006? Greatrix, Rachel Dowell, Jonathan BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: The United Kingdom Clinical Aptitude Test (UKCAT) is an aptitude test used since 2006 within selection processes of a consortium of UK medical and dental schools. Since 2006, student numbers have increased in medical training and schools now have an increased focus on widening access. A growing evidence base has emerged around medical student selection (Patterson et al., Med Educ 50:36–60, 2016) leading to changes in practice. However, whilst some papers describe local selection processes, there has been no overview of trends in selection processes over time across Universities. This study reports on how the use of the UKCAT in medical student selection has changed and comments on other changes in selection processes. METHODS: Telephone interviews were conducted annually with UKCAT Consortium medical schools. Use of the UKCAT was categorised and data analysed to identify trends over time. RESULTS: The number of schools using the UKCAT to select applicants for interview has risen, with cognitive test results contributing significantly to outcomes at this stage at many universities. Where schools use different weighted criteria (Factor Method), the UKCAT has largely replaced the use of personal statements. Use of the test at offer stage has also increased; the most significant use being to discriminate between applicants at a decision borderline. A growing number of schools are using the UKCAT Situational Judgement Test (SJT) in selection. In 2018, all but seven (out of 26) schools made some adjustment to selection processes for widening access applicants. Multiple Mini Interviews (MMIs) are now used by the majority of schools. Whilst medical student numbers have increased over this time, the ratio of applicants to places has fallen. The probability of applicants being invited to interview or receiving an offer has increased. CONCLUSIONS: More medical schools are using the UKCAT in undergraduate selection processes in an increasing number of ways and with increasing weight compared with 2007. It has replaced the use of personal statements in all but a few Consortium medical schools. An increased focus on academic attainment and the UKCAT across medical schools may be leading to the need for schools to interview and make offers to more applicants. BioMed Central 2020-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7487558/ /pubmed/32891164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02214-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Greatrix, Rachel
Dowell, Jonathan
UKCAT and medical student selection in the UK – what has changed since 2006?
title UKCAT and medical student selection in the UK – what has changed since 2006?
title_full UKCAT and medical student selection in the UK – what has changed since 2006?
title_fullStr UKCAT and medical student selection in the UK – what has changed since 2006?
title_full_unstemmed UKCAT and medical student selection in the UK – what has changed since 2006?
title_short UKCAT and medical student selection in the UK – what has changed since 2006?
title_sort ukcat and medical student selection in the uk – what has changed since 2006?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7487558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32891164
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02214-1
work_keys_str_mv AT greatrixrachel ukcatandmedicalstudentselectionintheukwhathaschangedsince2006
AT dowelljonathan ukcatandmedicalstudentselectionintheukwhathaschangedsince2006