Cargando…

Intubation during a medevac flight: safety and effect on total prehospital time in the helicopter emergency medical service system

INTRODUCTION: The Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) commonly intubates patients who require advanced airway support prior to takeoff. In-flight intubation (IFI) is avoided because it is considered difficult due to limited space, difficulty communicating, and vibration in flight. However, I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maeyama, Hiroki, Naito, Hiromichi, Guyette, Francis X., Yorifuji, Takashi, Banshotani, Yuki, Matsui, Daisaku, Yumoto, Tetsuya, Nakao, Atsunori, Kobayashi, Makoto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7487559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32894186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-020-00784-z
_version_ 1783581511708049408
author Maeyama, Hiroki
Naito, Hiromichi
Guyette, Francis X.
Yorifuji, Takashi
Banshotani, Yuki
Matsui, Daisaku
Yumoto, Tetsuya
Nakao, Atsunori
Kobayashi, Makoto
author_facet Maeyama, Hiroki
Naito, Hiromichi
Guyette, Francis X.
Yorifuji, Takashi
Banshotani, Yuki
Matsui, Daisaku
Yumoto, Tetsuya
Nakao, Atsunori
Kobayashi, Makoto
author_sort Maeyama, Hiroki
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) commonly intubates patients who require advanced airway support prior to takeoff. In-flight intubation (IFI) is avoided because it is considered difficult due to limited space, difficulty communicating, and vibration in flight. However, IFI may shorten the total prehospital time. We tested whether IFI can be performed safely by the HEMS. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in adult patients transported from 2010 to 2017 who received prehospital, non-emergent intubation from a single HEMS. We divided the cohort in two groups, patients intubated during flight (flight group, FG) and patients intubated before takeoff (ground group, GG). The primary outcome was the proportion of successful intubations. Secondary outcomes included total prehospital time and the incidence of complications. RESULTS: We analyzed 376 patients transported during the study period, 192 patients in the FG and 184 patients in the GG. The intubation success rate did not differ between the two groups (FG 189/192 [98.4%] vs. GG 179/184 [97.3%], p = 0.50). There were also no differences in hypoxia (FG 4/117 [3.4%] vs. GG 4/95 [4.2%], p = 1.00) or hypotension (FG 6/117 [5.1%] vs. GG 5/95 [5.3%], p = 1.00) between the two groups. Scene time and total prehospital time were shorter in the FG (scene time 7 min vs. 14 min, p <  0.001; total prehospital time 33.5 min vs. 40.0 min, p <  0.001). CONCLUSIONS: IFI was safely performed with high success rates, similar to intubation on the ground, without increasing the risk of hypoxia or hypotension. IFI by experienced providers shortened transportation time, which may improve patient outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7487559
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74875592020-09-15 Intubation during a medevac flight: safety and effect on total prehospital time in the helicopter emergency medical service system Maeyama, Hiroki Naito, Hiromichi Guyette, Francis X. Yorifuji, Takashi Banshotani, Yuki Matsui, Daisaku Yumoto, Tetsuya Nakao, Atsunori Kobayashi, Makoto Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research INTRODUCTION: The Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) commonly intubates patients who require advanced airway support prior to takeoff. In-flight intubation (IFI) is avoided because it is considered difficult due to limited space, difficulty communicating, and vibration in flight. However, IFI may shorten the total prehospital time. We tested whether IFI can be performed safely by the HEMS. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in adult patients transported from 2010 to 2017 who received prehospital, non-emergent intubation from a single HEMS. We divided the cohort in two groups, patients intubated during flight (flight group, FG) and patients intubated before takeoff (ground group, GG). The primary outcome was the proportion of successful intubations. Secondary outcomes included total prehospital time and the incidence of complications. RESULTS: We analyzed 376 patients transported during the study period, 192 patients in the FG and 184 patients in the GG. The intubation success rate did not differ between the two groups (FG 189/192 [98.4%] vs. GG 179/184 [97.3%], p = 0.50). There were also no differences in hypoxia (FG 4/117 [3.4%] vs. GG 4/95 [4.2%], p = 1.00) or hypotension (FG 6/117 [5.1%] vs. GG 5/95 [5.3%], p = 1.00) between the two groups. Scene time and total prehospital time were shorter in the FG (scene time 7 min vs. 14 min, p <  0.001; total prehospital time 33.5 min vs. 40.0 min, p <  0.001). CONCLUSIONS: IFI was safely performed with high success rates, similar to intubation on the ground, without increasing the risk of hypoxia or hypotension. IFI by experienced providers shortened transportation time, which may improve patient outcomes. BioMed Central 2020-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7487559/ /pubmed/32894186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-020-00784-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Original Research
Maeyama, Hiroki
Naito, Hiromichi
Guyette, Francis X.
Yorifuji, Takashi
Banshotani, Yuki
Matsui, Daisaku
Yumoto, Tetsuya
Nakao, Atsunori
Kobayashi, Makoto
Intubation during a medevac flight: safety and effect on total prehospital time in the helicopter emergency medical service system
title Intubation during a medevac flight: safety and effect on total prehospital time in the helicopter emergency medical service system
title_full Intubation during a medevac flight: safety and effect on total prehospital time in the helicopter emergency medical service system
title_fullStr Intubation during a medevac flight: safety and effect on total prehospital time in the helicopter emergency medical service system
title_full_unstemmed Intubation during a medevac flight: safety and effect on total prehospital time in the helicopter emergency medical service system
title_short Intubation during a medevac flight: safety and effect on total prehospital time in the helicopter emergency medical service system
title_sort intubation during a medevac flight: safety and effect on total prehospital time in the helicopter emergency medical service system
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7487559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32894186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-020-00784-z
work_keys_str_mv AT maeyamahiroki intubationduringamedevacflightsafetyandeffectontotalprehospitaltimeinthehelicopteremergencymedicalservicesystem
AT naitohiromichi intubationduringamedevacflightsafetyandeffectontotalprehospitaltimeinthehelicopteremergencymedicalservicesystem
AT guyettefrancisx intubationduringamedevacflightsafetyandeffectontotalprehospitaltimeinthehelicopteremergencymedicalservicesystem
AT yorifujitakashi intubationduringamedevacflightsafetyandeffectontotalprehospitaltimeinthehelicopteremergencymedicalservicesystem
AT banshotaniyuki intubationduringamedevacflightsafetyandeffectontotalprehospitaltimeinthehelicopteremergencymedicalservicesystem
AT matsuidaisaku intubationduringamedevacflightsafetyandeffectontotalprehospitaltimeinthehelicopteremergencymedicalservicesystem
AT yumototetsuya intubationduringamedevacflightsafetyandeffectontotalprehospitaltimeinthehelicopteremergencymedicalservicesystem
AT nakaoatsunori intubationduringamedevacflightsafetyandeffectontotalprehospitaltimeinthehelicopteremergencymedicalservicesystem
AT kobayashimakoto intubationduringamedevacflightsafetyandeffectontotalprehospitaltimeinthehelicopteremergencymedicalservicesystem