Cargando…

Dynamic spinal posture and pelvic position analysis using a rasterstereographic device

BACKGROUND: Until recently, rasterstereographic analysis of the spine was limited to static measurements. However, understanding and evaluating the motion of the spine under dynamic conditions is an important factor in the diagnosis and treatment of spinal pathologies. The aim of this study was to s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michalik, Roman, Hamm, Juliane, Quack, Valentin, Eschweiler, Jörg, Gatz, Matthias, Betsch, Marcel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7487646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32900390
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01825-0
_version_ 1783581529823248384
author Michalik, Roman
Hamm, Juliane
Quack, Valentin
Eschweiler, Jörg
Gatz, Matthias
Betsch, Marcel
author_facet Michalik, Roman
Hamm, Juliane
Quack, Valentin
Eschweiler, Jörg
Gatz, Matthias
Betsch, Marcel
author_sort Michalik, Roman
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Until recently, rasterstereographic analysis of the spine was limited to static measurements. However, understanding and evaluating the motion of the spine under dynamic conditions is an important factor in the diagnosis and treatment of spinal pathologies. The aim of this study was to study the spinal posture and pelvic position under dynamic conditions and compare it to static measurements using a dynamic rasterstereographic system. METHODS: A total of 121 healthy volunteers (56 females; 65 males) were included in this observational study. The parameters trunk inclination, trunk imbalance, pelvic obliquity, kyphotic angle, lordotic angle, surface rotation, and lateral deviation were studied and compared under static and dynamic (1, 2, 4, 5 km/h) conditions using the system “Formetric 4D Motion®“ (DIERS International GmbH, Germany). RESULTS: Female volunteers had a higher lordotic angle than males under static conditions (p < 0.001). Trunk inclination (5.31° vs. 6.74°), vertebral kyphotic angle (42.53° vs. 39, 59°), and surface rotation (3.35° vs. 3.81°) increase under dynamic conditions (p < 0.001). Trunk inclination and lordotic angle both show significant changes during walking compared to static conditions (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The spinal posture differs between females and males during standing and during walking. Rasterstereography is a valuable tool for the dynamic evaluation of spinal posture and pelvic position, which can also be used to quantify motion in the spine and therefore it has the potential to improve the understanding and treatment of spinal pathologies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7487646
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74876462020-09-16 Dynamic spinal posture and pelvic position analysis using a rasterstereographic device Michalik, Roman Hamm, Juliane Quack, Valentin Eschweiler, Jörg Gatz, Matthias Betsch, Marcel J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Until recently, rasterstereographic analysis of the spine was limited to static measurements. However, understanding and evaluating the motion of the spine under dynamic conditions is an important factor in the diagnosis and treatment of spinal pathologies. The aim of this study was to study the spinal posture and pelvic position under dynamic conditions and compare it to static measurements using a dynamic rasterstereographic system. METHODS: A total of 121 healthy volunteers (56 females; 65 males) were included in this observational study. The parameters trunk inclination, trunk imbalance, pelvic obliquity, kyphotic angle, lordotic angle, surface rotation, and lateral deviation were studied and compared under static and dynamic (1, 2, 4, 5 km/h) conditions using the system “Formetric 4D Motion®“ (DIERS International GmbH, Germany). RESULTS: Female volunteers had a higher lordotic angle than males under static conditions (p < 0.001). Trunk inclination (5.31° vs. 6.74°), vertebral kyphotic angle (42.53° vs. 39, 59°), and surface rotation (3.35° vs. 3.81°) increase under dynamic conditions (p < 0.001). Trunk inclination and lordotic angle both show significant changes during walking compared to static conditions (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The spinal posture differs between females and males during standing and during walking. Rasterstereography is a valuable tool for the dynamic evaluation of spinal posture and pelvic position, which can also be used to quantify motion in the spine and therefore it has the potential to improve the understanding and treatment of spinal pathologies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered BioMed Central 2020-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7487646/ /pubmed/32900390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01825-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Michalik, Roman
Hamm, Juliane
Quack, Valentin
Eschweiler, Jörg
Gatz, Matthias
Betsch, Marcel
Dynamic spinal posture and pelvic position analysis using a rasterstereographic device
title Dynamic spinal posture and pelvic position analysis using a rasterstereographic device
title_full Dynamic spinal posture and pelvic position analysis using a rasterstereographic device
title_fullStr Dynamic spinal posture and pelvic position analysis using a rasterstereographic device
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic spinal posture and pelvic position analysis using a rasterstereographic device
title_short Dynamic spinal posture and pelvic position analysis using a rasterstereographic device
title_sort dynamic spinal posture and pelvic position analysis using a rasterstereographic device
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7487646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32900390
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01825-0
work_keys_str_mv AT michalikroman dynamicspinalpostureandpelvicpositionanalysisusingarasterstereographicdevice
AT hammjuliane dynamicspinalpostureandpelvicpositionanalysisusingarasterstereographicdevice
AT quackvalentin dynamicspinalpostureandpelvicpositionanalysisusingarasterstereographicdevice
AT eschweilerjorg dynamicspinalpostureandpelvicpositionanalysisusingarasterstereographicdevice
AT gatzmatthias dynamicspinalpostureandpelvicpositionanalysisusingarasterstereographicdevice
AT betschmarcel dynamicspinalpostureandpelvicpositionanalysisusingarasterstereographicdevice