Cargando…

Sterilization regret in India: Is quality of care a matter of concern?

BACKGROUND: According to United Nations, 19% of females in the world relied only on the permanent method of family planning, with 37% in India according to NFHS-4. Limited studies tried to measure the sterilization regret, and its correlated factors. The study tried to explore the trend of steriliza...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bansal, Anjali, Dwivedi, Laxmi Kant
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7487658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32944281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40834-020-00115-8
_version_ 1783581532399599616
author Bansal, Anjali
Dwivedi, Laxmi Kant
author_facet Bansal, Anjali
Dwivedi, Laxmi Kant
author_sort Bansal, Anjali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: According to United Nations, 19% of females in the world relied only on the permanent method of family planning, with 37% in India according to NFHS-4. Limited studies tried to measure the sterilization regret, and its correlated factors. The study tried to explore the trend of sterilization regret in India from 1992 to 2015 and to elicit the determining effects of various factors on sterilization regret, especially in context to perceived quality of care in the sterilization operations and type of providers. DATA AND METHODS: The pooled data from NFHS-1, NFHS-3 and NFHS-4 was used to explore the regret by creating interaction between time and all the predictors. Predicted probabilities were calculated to show the trend of sterilization regret amounting to quality of care, type of health provider at the three time periods. RESULTS: The sterilization regret was increased from 5 % in NFHS-1 to 7 % in NFHS-4. According to NFHS-4, for those whose sterilization was performed in private health facility the regret was found to be less (OR-0.937; 95% CI- (0.882–0.996)) compared to public health facility. Also, the results show a two-fold increase in regret when women reported bad quality of care. The results from predicted probabilities provide enough evidence that the regret due to bad quality of care in sterilization operation had increased with each subsequent round of NFHS. CONCLUSION: Many socio-economic and demographic factors have influenced the regret, but the poor quality of care contributed maximum to the regret from 1992 to 2015. The health facilities have seriously strayed from improving the health and well-being of women in providing the family planning methods. In addition, to public facilities, the regret amounting to private facilities have also increased from NFHS-1 to 4. The quality of care provided in the family planning operation should be standardized in every hospital to strengthen the health systems in the country. The couple should be motivated to adopt more of spacing methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7487658
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74876582020-09-16 Sterilization regret in India: Is quality of care a matter of concern? Bansal, Anjali Dwivedi, Laxmi Kant Contracept Reprod Med Research BACKGROUND: According to United Nations, 19% of females in the world relied only on the permanent method of family planning, with 37% in India according to NFHS-4. Limited studies tried to measure the sterilization regret, and its correlated factors. The study tried to explore the trend of sterilization regret in India from 1992 to 2015 and to elicit the determining effects of various factors on sterilization regret, especially in context to perceived quality of care in the sterilization operations and type of providers. DATA AND METHODS: The pooled data from NFHS-1, NFHS-3 and NFHS-4 was used to explore the regret by creating interaction between time and all the predictors. Predicted probabilities were calculated to show the trend of sterilization regret amounting to quality of care, type of health provider at the three time periods. RESULTS: The sterilization regret was increased from 5 % in NFHS-1 to 7 % in NFHS-4. According to NFHS-4, for those whose sterilization was performed in private health facility the regret was found to be less (OR-0.937; 95% CI- (0.882–0.996)) compared to public health facility. Also, the results show a two-fold increase in regret when women reported bad quality of care. The results from predicted probabilities provide enough evidence that the regret due to bad quality of care in sterilization operation had increased with each subsequent round of NFHS. CONCLUSION: Many socio-economic and demographic factors have influenced the regret, but the poor quality of care contributed maximum to the regret from 1992 to 2015. The health facilities have seriously strayed from improving the health and well-being of women in providing the family planning methods. In addition, to public facilities, the regret amounting to private facilities have also increased from NFHS-1 to 4. The quality of care provided in the family planning operation should be standardized in every hospital to strengthen the health systems in the country. The couple should be motivated to adopt more of spacing methods. BioMed Central 2020-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7487658/ /pubmed/32944281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40834-020-00115-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Bansal, Anjali
Dwivedi, Laxmi Kant
Sterilization regret in India: Is quality of care a matter of concern?
title Sterilization regret in India: Is quality of care a matter of concern?
title_full Sterilization regret in India: Is quality of care a matter of concern?
title_fullStr Sterilization regret in India: Is quality of care a matter of concern?
title_full_unstemmed Sterilization regret in India: Is quality of care a matter of concern?
title_short Sterilization regret in India: Is quality of care a matter of concern?
title_sort sterilization regret in india: is quality of care a matter of concern?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7487658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32944281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40834-020-00115-8
work_keys_str_mv AT bansalanjali sterilizationregretinindiaisqualityofcareamatterofconcern
AT dwivedilaxmikant sterilizationregretinindiaisqualityofcareamatterofconcern