Cargando…

Effect of nipple shield use on milk removal: a mechanistic study

BACKGROUND: Concerns about reduced milk transfer with nipple shield (NS) use are based on evidence from studies with methodological flaws. Milk removal during breastfeeding can be impacted by infant and maternal factors other than NS use. The aim of this study was to control electric breast pump vac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coentro, Viviane Silva, Perrella, Sharon Lisa, Lai, Ching Tat, Rea, Alethea, Murray, Kevin, Geddes, Donna Tracy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7487699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32894074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03191-5
_version_ 1783581541069225984
author Coentro, Viviane Silva
Perrella, Sharon Lisa
Lai, Ching Tat
Rea, Alethea
Murray, Kevin
Geddes, Donna Tracy
author_facet Coentro, Viviane Silva
Perrella, Sharon Lisa
Lai, Ching Tat
Rea, Alethea
Murray, Kevin
Geddes, Donna Tracy
author_sort Coentro, Viviane Silva
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Concerns about reduced milk transfer with nipple shield (NS) use are based on evidence from studies with methodological flaws. Milk removal during breastfeeding can be impacted by infant and maternal factors other than NS use. The aim of this study was to control electric breast pump vacuum strength, pattern and duration across multiple study sessions to determine if NS use reduces milk removal from the breast. METHODS: A within-subject study with two groups of breastfeeding mothers (infants < 6 months) were recruited; Control Group (CG): no breastfeeding difficulties; Pain Group (PG) used NS for persistent nipple pain. Mothers completed three randomised 15 min pumping sessions using the Symphony vacuum curve (Medela AG); no NS, fitted NS, and a small NS. Sessions were considered valid where the applied vacuum was within 20 mmHg of the set vacuum. Milk removal was considered as pumped milk volume, and also percentage of available milk removed (PAMR), which is calculated as the pumped volume divided by the estimated milk volume stored in the breast immediately prior to pumping. RESULTS: Of 62 sessions (all: n = 31 paired sessions) a total of 11 paired sessions from both PG (n = 03) and CG (n = 08) were valid (subset) with and without a fitted NS. Only 2 small shield sessions were valid and so all small shield measurements were excluded. Both pumped volumes and PAMR were significantly lower with NS use for all data but not for subset data. (All: Volume and PAMR median: no NS: 76.5 mL, 69%, Fitted NS: 32.1 mL, 41% respectively (volume p = 0.002, PAMR p = 0.002); Subset: Volume and PAMR median: no NS: 83.8 mL, 72%; Fitted NS: 35.2 mL, 40% (volume p = 0.111 and PAMR p = 0.045). The difference in PAMR, but not volume, was statistically significant when analysed by linear mixed modelling. A decrease of 10 mmHg was associated with a 4.4% increase in PAMR (p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: This experimental data suggests that nipple shield use may reduce milk removal. Close clinical monitoring of breastfeeding mothers using nipple shields is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7487699
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74876992020-09-16 Effect of nipple shield use on milk removal: a mechanistic study Coentro, Viviane Silva Perrella, Sharon Lisa Lai, Ching Tat Rea, Alethea Murray, Kevin Geddes, Donna Tracy BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Concerns about reduced milk transfer with nipple shield (NS) use are based on evidence from studies with methodological flaws. Milk removal during breastfeeding can be impacted by infant and maternal factors other than NS use. The aim of this study was to control electric breast pump vacuum strength, pattern and duration across multiple study sessions to determine if NS use reduces milk removal from the breast. METHODS: A within-subject study with two groups of breastfeeding mothers (infants < 6 months) were recruited; Control Group (CG): no breastfeeding difficulties; Pain Group (PG) used NS for persistent nipple pain. Mothers completed three randomised 15 min pumping sessions using the Symphony vacuum curve (Medela AG); no NS, fitted NS, and a small NS. Sessions were considered valid where the applied vacuum was within 20 mmHg of the set vacuum. Milk removal was considered as pumped milk volume, and also percentage of available milk removed (PAMR), which is calculated as the pumped volume divided by the estimated milk volume stored in the breast immediately prior to pumping. RESULTS: Of 62 sessions (all: n = 31 paired sessions) a total of 11 paired sessions from both PG (n = 03) and CG (n = 08) were valid (subset) with and without a fitted NS. Only 2 small shield sessions were valid and so all small shield measurements were excluded. Both pumped volumes and PAMR were significantly lower with NS use for all data but not for subset data. (All: Volume and PAMR median: no NS: 76.5 mL, 69%, Fitted NS: 32.1 mL, 41% respectively (volume p = 0.002, PAMR p = 0.002); Subset: Volume and PAMR median: no NS: 83.8 mL, 72%; Fitted NS: 35.2 mL, 40% (volume p = 0.111 and PAMR p = 0.045). The difference in PAMR, but not volume, was statistically significant when analysed by linear mixed modelling. A decrease of 10 mmHg was associated with a 4.4% increase in PAMR (p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: This experimental data suggests that nipple shield use may reduce milk removal. Close clinical monitoring of breastfeeding mothers using nipple shields is warranted. BioMed Central 2020-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7487699/ /pubmed/32894074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03191-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Coentro, Viviane Silva
Perrella, Sharon Lisa
Lai, Ching Tat
Rea, Alethea
Murray, Kevin
Geddes, Donna Tracy
Effect of nipple shield use on milk removal: a mechanistic study
title Effect of nipple shield use on milk removal: a mechanistic study
title_full Effect of nipple shield use on milk removal: a mechanistic study
title_fullStr Effect of nipple shield use on milk removal: a mechanistic study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of nipple shield use on milk removal: a mechanistic study
title_short Effect of nipple shield use on milk removal: a mechanistic study
title_sort effect of nipple shield use on milk removal: a mechanistic study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7487699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32894074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03191-5
work_keys_str_mv AT coentrovivianesilva effectofnippleshielduseonmilkremovalamechanisticstudy
AT perrellasharonlisa effectofnippleshielduseonmilkremovalamechanisticstudy
AT laichingtat effectofnippleshielduseonmilkremovalamechanisticstudy
AT reaalethea effectofnippleshielduseonmilkremovalamechanisticstudy
AT murraykevin effectofnippleshielduseonmilkremovalamechanisticstudy
AT geddesdonnatracy effectofnippleshielduseonmilkremovalamechanisticstudy