Cargando…
Analysing the potential of hydrophilic adhesive systems to optimise orthodontic bracket rebonding
INTRODUCTION: Bond failure during fixed orthodontic treatment is a frequently occurring problem. As bracket rebonding is associated with reduced shear bond strength, the aim of the present investigation is to analyse the effect of different innovative rebonding systems to identify optimised rebondin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7487826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32891153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-020-00233-3 |
_version_ | 1783581568747438080 |
---|---|
author | Knaup, Isabel Böddeker, Antonia Tempel, Katrin Weber, Eva Bartz, Jenny Rosa Rückbeil, Marcia Viviane Craveiro, Rogério Bastos Wagner, Yvonne Wolf, Michael |
author_facet | Knaup, Isabel Böddeker, Antonia Tempel, Katrin Weber, Eva Bartz, Jenny Rosa Rückbeil, Marcia Viviane Craveiro, Rogério Bastos Wagner, Yvonne Wolf, Michael |
author_sort | Knaup, Isabel |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Bond failure during fixed orthodontic treatment is a frequently occurring problem. As bracket rebonding is associated with reduced shear bond strength, the aim of the present investigation is to analyse the effect of different innovative rebonding systems to identify optimised rebonding protocols for orthodontic patient care. METHODS: Metallic brackets were bonded to the frontal enamel surfaces of 240 bovine lower incisors embedded in resin bases. Teeth were randomly divided into two major experimental groups: in group 1 a hydrophilic primer (Assure™ PLUS) was compared to commonly used orthodontic adhesives (Transbond XT™, BrackFix®, Grengloo™) and a zero control. In group 2 different rebonding systems were analysed using a hydrophilic primer (Assure™ PLUS), a methyl methacrylate-consisting primer (Plastic Conditioner) and a conventional adhesive (Transbond XT™). All teeth were tested for shear bond strength according to the DIN-13990 standard, the Adhesive Remnant Index and enamel fracture rate. RESULTS: The hydrophilic primer enhanced shear bond strength at first bonding (Assure™ PLUS 20.29 ± 4.95 MPa vs. Transbond XT™ 18.45 ± 2.57 MPa; BrackFix® 17 ± 5.2 MPa; Grengloo™ 19.08 ± 3.19 MPa; Meron 8.7 ± 3.9 MPa) and second bonding (Assure™ PLUS 16.76 ± 3.71 MPa vs. Transbond XT™ 13.06 ± 3.19 MPa). Using Plastic Conditioner did not seem to improve shear bond strength at rebonding (13.57 ± 2.94). When enamel etching was left out, required shear bond strength could not be achieved (Plastic Conditioner + Assure™ PLUS 8.12 ± 3.34 MPa; Plastic Conditioner: 3.7 ± 1.95 MPa). Hydrophilic priming systems showed decreased ARI-scores (second bonding: 2.63) and increased enamel fracture rates (first bonding: 55%; second bonding 21,05%). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the present study we found that rebonding strength could be compensated by the use of hydrophilic priming systems. The additional use of a methyl methacrylate-consisting primer does not seem to enhance shear bond strength. No etching approaches resulted in non-sufficient bond strength. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7487826 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74878262020-09-16 Analysing the potential of hydrophilic adhesive systems to optimise orthodontic bracket rebonding Knaup, Isabel Böddeker, Antonia Tempel, Katrin Weber, Eva Bartz, Jenny Rosa Rückbeil, Marcia Viviane Craveiro, Rogério Bastos Wagner, Yvonne Wolf, Michael Head Face Med Research INTRODUCTION: Bond failure during fixed orthodontic treatment is a frequently occurring problem. As bracket rebonding is associated with reduced shear bond strength, the aim of the present investigation is to analyse the effect of different innovative rebonding systems to identify optimised rebonding protocols for orthodontic patient care. METHODS: Metallic brackets were bonded to the frontal enamel surfaces of 240 bovine lower incisors embedded in resin bases. Teeth were randomly divided into two major experimental groups: in group 1 a hydrophilic primer (Assure™ PLUS) was compared to commonly used orthodontic adhesives (Transbond XT™, BrackFix®, Grengloo™) and a zero control. In group 2 different rebonding systems were analysed using a hydrophilic primer (Assure™ PLUS), a methyl methacrylate-consisting primer (Plastic Conditioner) and a conventional adhesive (Transbond XT™). All teeth were tested for shear bond strength according to the DIN-13990 standard, the Adhesive Remnant Index and enamel fracture rate. RESULTS: The hydrophilic primer enhanced shear bond strength at first bonding (Assure™ PLUS 20.29 ± 4.95 MPa vs. Transbond XT™ 18.45 ± 2.57 MPa; BrackFix® 17 ± 5.2 MPa; Grengloo™ 19.08 ± 3.19 MPa; Meron 8.7 ± 3.9 MPa) and second bonding (Assure™ PLUS 16.76 ± 3.71 MPa vs. Transbond XT™ 13.06 ± 3.19 MPa). Using Plastic Conditioner did not seem to improve shear bond strength at rebonding (13.57 ± 2.94). When enamel etching was left out, required shear bond strength could not be achieved (Plastic Conditioner + Assure™ PLUS 8.12 ± 3.34 MPa; Plastic Conditioner: 3.7 ± 1.95 MPa). Hydrophilic priming systems showed decreased ARI-scores (second bonding: 2.63) and increased enamel fracture rates (first bonding: 55%; second bonding 21,05%). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the present study we found that rebonding strength could be compensated by the use of hydrophilic priming systems. The additional use of a methyl methacrylate-consisting primer does not seem to enhance shear bond strength. No etching approaches resulted in non-sufficient bond strength. BioMed Central 2020-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7487826/ /pubmed/32891153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-020-00233-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Knaup, Isabel Böddeker, Antonia Tempel, Katrin Weber, Eva Bartz, Jenny Rosa Rückbeil, Marcia Viviane Craveiro, Rogério Bastos Wagner, Yvonne Wolf, Michael Analysing the potential of hydrophilic adhesive systems to optimise orthodontic bracket rebonding |
title | Analysing the potential of hydrophilic adhesive systems to optimise orthodontic bracket rebonding |
title_full | Analysing the potential of hydrophilic adhesive systems to optimise orthodontic bracket rebonding |
title_fullStr | Analysing the potential of hydrophilic adhesive systems to optimise orthodontic bracket rebonding |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysing the potential of hydrophilic adhesive systems to optimise orthodontic bracket rebonding |
title_short | Analysing the potential of hydrophilic adhesive systems to optimise orthodontic bracket rebonding |
title_sort | analysing the potential of hydrophilic adhesive systems to optimise orthodontic bracket rebonding |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7487826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32891153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-020-00233-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT knaupisabel analysingthepotentialofhydrophilicadhesivesystemstooptimiseorthodonticbracketrebonding AT boddekerantonia analysingthepotentialofhydrophilicadhesivesystemstooptimiseorthodonticbracketrebonding AT tempelkatrin analysingthepotentialofhydrophilicadhesivesystemstooptimiseorthodonticbracketrebonding AT webereva analysingthepotentialofhydrophilicadhesivesystemstooptimiseorthodonticbracketrebonding AT bartzjennyrosa analysingthepotentialofhydrophilicadhesivesystemstooptimiseorthodonticbracketrebonding AT ruckbeilmarciaviviane analysingthepotentialofhydrophilicadhesivesystemstooptimiseorthodonticbracketrebonding AT craveirorogeriobastos analysingthepotentialofhydrophilicadhesivesystemstooptimiseorthodonticbracketrebonding AT wagneryvonne analysingthepotentialofhydrophilicadhesivesystemstooptimiseorthodonticbracketrebonding AT wolfmichael analysingthepotentialofhydrophilicadhesivesystemstooptimiseorthodonticbracketrebonding |