Cargando…

Evaluating a frontostriatal working-memory updating-training paradigm in Parkinson’s disease: the iPARK trial, a double-blinded randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Cognitive decline and dementia are common in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Cognitive deficits have been linked to the depletion of dopamine in the nigrostriatal pathway, but pharmacological treatments for PD have little evidence of improving or delaying cognitive decline. Therefore, explorin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Domellöf, Magdalena Eriksson, Walton, Lois, Boraxbekk, Carl-Johan, Bäckström, David, Josefsson, Maria, Forsgren, Lars, Stigsdotter Neely, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7487848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32894075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-020-01893-z
_version_ 1783581573507973120
author Domellöf, Magdalena Eriksson
Walton, Lois
Boraxbekk, Carl-Johan
Bäckström, David
Josefsson, Maria
Forsgren, Lars
Stigsdotter Neely, Anna
author_facet Domellöf, Magdalena Eriksson
Walton, Lois
Boraxbekk, Carl-Johan
Bäckström, David
Josefsson, Maria
Forsgren, Lars
Stigsdotter Neely, Anna
author_sort Domellöf, Magdalena Eriksson
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cognitive decline and dementia are common in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Cognitive deficits have been linked to the depletion of dopamine in the nigrostriatal pathway, but pharmacological treatments for PD have little evidence of improving or delaying cognitive decline. Therefore, exploring non-pharmacological treatment options is important. There have been some promising results of cognitive training interventions in PD, especially for improvements in working memory and executive functions. Yet, existing studies are often underpowered, lacking appropriate control condition, long term follow-up, a thorough description of the intervention and characteristics of the participants. Working memory updating training has previously shown to increase striatal activation in healthy young and old participants as well as dopaminergic neurotransmission in healthy young participants. In the light of dopamine dysfunction in PD, with negative effects on both motor and cognitive functions it is of interest to study if an impaired striatal system can be responsive to a non-invasive, non-pharmacological intervention. METHODS AND DESIGN: The iPARK trial is a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial with a parallel-group design that aims to recruit 80 patients with PD (during the period 02/2017–02/2023). Included patients need to have PD, Hoehn and Yahr staging I-III, be between 45 to 75 years of age and not have a diagnosis of dementia. All patients will undergo 30 sessions (6–8 weeks) of web-based cognitive training performed from home. The target intervention is a process-based training program targeting working memory updating. The placebo program is a low dose short-term memory program. A battery of neuropsychological tests and questionnaires will be performed before training, directly after training, and 16 weeks after training. DISCUSSION: We expect that the iPARK trial will provide novel and clinically useful information on whether updating training is an effective cognitive training paradigm in PD. Further, it will hopefully contribute to a better understanding of cognitive function in PD and provide answers regarding cognitive plasticity as well as determining critical factors for a responsive striatal system. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov registry number: NCT03680170, registry name: “Cognitive Training in Parkinson’s Disease: the iPARK study”, retrospectively registered on the 21st of September 2018. The inclusion of the first participant was the 1st of February 2017.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7487848
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74878482020-09-16 Evaluating a frontostriatal working-memory updating-training paradigm in Parkinson’s disease: the iPARK trial, a double-blinded randomized controlled trial Domellöf, Magdalena Eriksson Walton, Lois Boraxbekk, Carl-Johan Bäckström, David Josefsson, Maria Forsgren, Lars Stigsdotter Neely, Anna BMC Neurol Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Cognitive decline and dementia are common in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Cognitive deficits have been linked to the depletion of dopamine in the nigrostriatal pathway, but pharmacological treatments for PD have little evidence of improving or delaying cognitive decline. Therefore, exploring non-pharmacological treatment options is important. There have been some promising results of cognitive training interventions in PD, especially for improvements in working memory and executive functions. Yet, existing studies are often underpowered, lacking appropriate control condition, long term follow-up, a thorough description of the intervention and characteristics of the participants. Working memory updating training has previously shown to increase striatal activation in healthy young and old participants as well as dopaminergic neurotransmission in healthy young participants. In the light of dopamine dysfunction in PD, with negative effects on both motor and cognitive functions it is of interest to study if an impaired striatal system can be responsive to a non-invasive, non-pharmacological intervention. METHODS AND DESIGN: The iPARK trial is a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial with a parallel-group design that aims to recruit 80 patients with PD (during the period 02/2017–02/2023). Included patients need to have PD, Hoehn and Yahr staging I-III, be between 45 to 75 years of age and not have a diagnosis of dementia. All patients will undergo 30 sessions (6–8 weeks) of web-based cognitive training performed from home. The target intervention is a process-based training program targeting working memory updating. The placebo program is a low dose short-term memory program. A battery of neuropsychological tests and questionnaires will be performed before training, directly after training, and 16 weeks after training. DISCUSSION: We expect that the iPARK trial will provide novel and clinically useful information on whether updating training is an effective cognitive training paradigm in PD. Further, it will hopefully contribute to a better understanding of cognitive function in PD and provide answers regarding cognitive plasticity as well as determining critical factors for a responsive striatal system. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov registry number: NCT03680170, registry name: “Cognitive Training in Parkinson’s Disease: the iPARK study”, retrospectively registered on the 21st of September 2018. The inclusion of the first participant was the 1st of February 2017. BioMed Central 2020-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7487848/ /pubmed/32894075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-020-01893-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Domellöf, Magdalena Eriksson
Walton, Lois
Boraxbekk, Carl-Johan
Bäckström, David
Josefsson, Maria
Forsgren, Lars
Stigsdotter Neely, Anna
Evaluating a frontostriatal working-memory updating-training paradigm in Parkinson’s disease: the iPARK trial, a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
title Evaluating a frontostriatal working-memory updating-training paradigm in Parkinson’s disease: the iPARK trial, a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_full Evaluating a frontostriatal working-memory updating-training paradigm in Parkinson’s disease: the iPARK trial, a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Evaluating a frontostriatal working-memory updating-training paradigm in Parkinson’s disease: the iPARK trial, a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating a frontostriatal working-memory updating-training paradigm in Parkinson’s disease: the iPARK trial, a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_short Evaluating a frontostriatal working-memory updating-training paradigm in Parkinson’s disease: the iPARK trial, a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
title_sort evaluating a frontostriatal working-memory updating-training paradigm in parkinson’s disease: the ipark trial, a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7487848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32894075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-020-01893-z
work_keys_str_mv AT domellofmagdalenaeriksson evaluatingafrontostriatalworkingmemoryupdatingtrainingparadigminparkinsonsdiseasetheiparktrialadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT waltonlois evaluatingafrontostriatalworkingmemoryupdatingtrainingparadigminparkinsonsdiseasetheiparktrialadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT boraxbekkcarljohan evaluatingafrontostriatalworkingmemoryupdatingtrainingparadigminparkinsonsdiseasetheiparktrialadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT backstromdavid evaluatingafrontostriatalworkingmemoryupdatingtrainingparadigminparkinsonsdiseasetheiparktrialadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT josefssonmaria evaluatingafrontostriatalworkingmemoryupdatingtrainingparadigminparkinsonsdiseasetheiparktrialadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT forsgrenlars evaluatingafrontostriatalworkingmemoryupdatingtrainingparadigminparkinsonsdiseasetheiparktrialadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT stigsdotterneelyanna evaluatingafrontostriatalworkingmemoryupdatingtrainingparadigminparkinsonsdiseasetheiparktrialadoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial