Cargando…

Women’s characteristics and care outcomes of caseload midwifery care in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: The maternity care system in the Netherlands is well known for its support of community-based midwifery. However, regular midwifery practices typically do not offer caseload midwifery care – one-to-one continuity of care throughout pregnancy and birth. Because we know very little about t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Offerhaus, Pien, Jans, Suze, Hukkelhoven, Chantal, de Vries, Raymond, Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7487921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32894082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03204-3
_version_ 1783581587978321920
author Offerhaus, Pien
Jans, Suze
Hukkelhoven, Chantal
de Vries, Raymond
Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne
author_facet Offerhaus, Pien
Jans, Suze
Hukkelhoven, Chantal
de Vries, Raymond
Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne
author_sort Offerhaus, Pien
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The maternity care system in the Netherlands is well known for its support of community-based midwifery. However, regular midwifery practices typically do not offer caseload midwifery care – one-to-one continuity of care throughout pregnancy and birth. Because we know very little about the outcomes for women receiving caseload care in the Netherlands, we compared caseload care with regular midwife-led care, looking at maternal and perinatal outcomes, including antenatal and intrapartum referrals to secondary (i.e., obstetrician-led) care. METHODS: We selected 657 women in caseload care and 1954 matched controls (women in regular midwife-led care) from all women registered in the Dutch Perinatal Registry (Perined) who gave birth in 2015. To be eligible for selection the women had to be in midwife-led antenatal care beyond 28 gestational weeks. Each woman in caseload care was matched with three women in regular midwife-led care, using parity, maternal age, background (Dutch or non-Dutch) and region. These two cohorts were compared for referral rates, mode of birth, and other maternal and perinatal outcomes. RESULTS: In caseload midwifery care, 46.9% of women were referred to obstetrician-led care (24.2% antenatally and 22.8% in the intrapartum period). In the matched cohort, 65.7% were referred (37.4% antenatally and 28.3% in the intrapartum period). In caseload care, 84.0% experienced a spontaneous vaginal birth versus 77.0% in regular midwife-led care. These patterns were observed for both nulliparous and multiparous women. Women in caseload care had fewer inductions of labour (13.2% vs 21.0%), more homebirths (39.4% vs 16.1%) and less perineal damage (intact perineum: 41.3% vs 28.2%). The incidence of perinatal mortality and a low Apgar score was low in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found that when compared to regular midwife-led care, caseload midwifery care in the Netherlands is associated with a lower referral rate to obstetrician-led care – both antenatally and in the intrapartum period – and a higher spontaneous vaginal birth rate, with similar perinatal safety. The challenge is to include this model as part of the current effort to improve the quality of Dutch maternity care, making caseload care available and affordable for more women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7487921
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74879212020-09-16 Women’s characteristics and care outcomes of caseload midwifery care in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study Offerhaus, Pien Jans, Suze Hukkelhoven, Chantal de Vries, Raymond Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: The maternity care system in the Netherlands is well known for its support of community-based midwifery. However, regular midwifery practices typically do not offer caseload midwifery care – one-to-one continuity of care throughout pregnancy and birth. Because we know very little about the outcomes for women receiving caseload care in the Netherlands, we compared caseload care with regular midwife-led care, looking at maternal and perinatal outcomes, including antenatal and intrapartum referrals to secondary (i.e., obstetrician-led) care. METHODS: We selected 657 women in caseload care and 1954 matched controls (women in regular midwife-led care) from all women registered in the Dutch Perinatal Registry (Perined) who gave birth in 2015. To be eligible for selection the women had to be in midwife-led antenatal care beyond 28 gestational weeks. Each woman in caseload care was matched with three women in regular midwife-led care, using parity, maternal age, background (Dutch or non-Dutch) and region. These two cohorts were compared for referral rates, mode of birth, and other maternal and perinatal outcomes. RESULTS: In caseload midwifery care, 46.9% of women were referred to obstetrician-led care (24.2% antenatally and 22.8% in the intrapartum period). In the matched cohort, 65.7% were referred (37.4% antenatally and 28.3% in the intrapartum period). In caseload care, 84.0% experienced a spontaneous vaginal birth versus 77.0% in regular midwife-led care. These patterns were observed for both nulliparous and multiparous women. Women in caseload care had fewer inductions of labour (13.2% vs 21.0%), more homebirths (39.4% vs 16.1%) and less perineal damage (intact perineum: 41.3% vs 28.2%). The incidence of perinatal mortality and a low Apgar score was low in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found that when compared to regular midwife-led care, caseload midwifery care in the Netherlands is associated with a lower referral rate to obstetrician-led care – both antenatally and in the intrapartum period – and a higher spontaneous vaginal birth rate, with similar perinatal safety. The challenge is to include this model as part of the current effort to improve the quality of Dutch maternity care, making caseload care available and affordable for more women. BioMed Central 2020-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7487921/ /pubmed/32894082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03204-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Offerhaus, Pien
Jans, Suze
Hukkelhoven, Chantal
de Vries, Raymond
Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne
Women’s characteristics and care outcomes of caseload midwifery care in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study
title Women’s characteristics and care outcomes of caseload midwifery care in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Women’s characteristics and care outcomes of caseload midwifery care in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Women’s characteristics and care outcomes of caseload midwifery care in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Women’s characteristics and care outcomes of caseload midwifery care in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Women’s characteristics and care outcomes of caseload midwifery care in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort women’s characteristics and care outcomes of caseload midwifery care in the netherlands: a retrospective cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7487921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32894082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03204-3
work_keys_str_mv AT offerhauspien womenscharacteristicsandcareoutcomesofcaseloadmidwiferycareinthenetherlandsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT janssuze womenscharacteristicsandcareoutcomesofcaseloadmidwiferycareinthenetherlandsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT hukkelhovenchantal womenscharacteristicsandcareoutcomesofcaseloadmidwiferycareinthenetherlandsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT devriesraymond womenscharacteristicsandcareoutcomesofcaseloadmidwiferycareinthenetherlandsaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT nieuwenhuijzemarianne womenscharacteristicsandcareoutcomesofcaseloadmidwiferycareinthenetherlandsaretrospectivecohortstudy