Cargando…

Suitability of administrative claims databases for bariatric surgery research – is the glass half-full or half-empty?

BACKGROUND: Claims databases are generally considered inadequate for obesity research due to suboptimal capture of body mass index (BMI) measurements. This might not be true for bariatric surgery because of reimbursement requirements and changes in coding systems. We assessed the availability and va...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Xiaojuan, Lewis, Kristina H., Callaway, Katherine, Wharam, J. Frank, Toh, Sengwee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7487952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32894060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01106-8
_version_ 1783581594621050880
author Li, Xiaojuan
Lewis, Kristina H.
Callaway, Katherine
Wharam, J. Frank
Toh, Sengwee
author_facet Li, Xiaojuan
Lewis, Kristina H.
Callaway, Katherine
Wharam, J. Frank
Toh, Sengwee
author_sort Li, Xiaojuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Claims databases are generally considered inadequate for obesity research due to suboptimal capture of body mass index (BMI) measurements. This might not be true for bariatric surgery because of reimbursement requirements and changes in coding systems. We assessed the availability and validity of claims-based weight-related diagnosis codes among bariatric surgery patients. METHODS: We identified three nested retrospective cohorts of adult bariatric surgery patients who underwent adjusted gastric banding, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, or sleeve gastrectomy between January 1, 2011 and June 30, 2018 using different components of OptumLabs® Data Warehouse, which contains linked de-identified claims and electronic health records (EHRs). We measured the availability of claims-based weight-related diagnosis codes in the 6-month preoperative and 1-year postoperative periods in the main cohort identified in the claims data. We created two claims-based algorithms to classify the presence of severe obesity (a commonly used cohort selection criterion) and categorize BMI (a commonly used baseline confounder or postoperative outcome). We evaluated their performance by estimating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and weighted kappa in two sub-cohorts using EHR-based BMI measurements as the reference. RESULTS: Among the 29,357 eligible patients identified using claims only, 28,828 (98.2%) had preoperative weight-related diagnosis codes, either granular indicating BMI ranges or nonspecific denoting obesity status. Among the 27,407 patients with granular preoperative codes, 12,346 (45.0%) had granular codes and 9355 (34.1%) had nonspecific codes in the 1-year postoperative period. Among the 3045 patients with both preoperative claims-based diagnosis codes and EHR-based BMI measurements, the severe obesity classification algorithm had a sensitivity 100%, specificity 71%, positive predictive value 100%, and negative predictive value 78%. The BMI categorization algorithm had good validity categorizing the last available preoperative or postoperative BMI measurements (weighted kappa [95% confidence interval]: preoperative 0.78, [0.76, 0.79]; postoperative 0.84, [0.80, 0.87]). CONCLUSIONS: Claims-based weight-related diagnosis codes had excellent validity before and after bariatric surgical operation but suboptimal availability after operation. Claims databases can be used for bariatric surgery studies of non-weight-related effectiveness and safety outcomes that are well-captured.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7487952
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74879522020-09-16 Suitability of administrative claims databases for bariatric surgery research – is the glass half-full or half-empty? Li, Xiaojuan Lewis, Kristina H. Callaway, Katherine Wharam, J. Frank Toh, Sengwee BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Claims databases are generally considered inadequate for obesity research due to suboptimal capture of body mass index (BMI) measurements. This might not be true for bariatric surgery because of reimbursement requirements and changes in coding systems. We assessed the availability and validity of claims-based weight-related diagnosis codes among bariatric surgery patients. METHODS: We identified three nested retrospective cohorts of adult bariatric surgery patients who underwent adjusted gastric banding, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, or sleeve gastrectomy between January 1, 2011 and June 30, 2018 using different components of OptumLabs® Data Warehouse, which contains linked de-identified claims and electronic health records (EHRs). We measured the availability of claims-based weight-related diagnosis codes in the 6-month preoperative and 1-year postoperative periods in the main cohort identified in the claims data. We created two claims-based algorithms to classify the presence of severe obesity (a commonly used cohort selection criterion) and categorize BMI (a commonly used baseline confounder or postoperative outcome). We evaluated their performance by estimating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and weighted kappa in two sub-cohorts using EHR-based BMI measurements as the reference. RESULTS: Among the 29,357 eligible patients identified using claims only, 28,828 (98.2%) had preoperative weight-related diagnosis codes, either granular indicating BMI ranges or nonspecific denoting obesity status. Among the 27,407 patients with granular preoperative codes, 12,346 (45.0%) had granular codes and 9355 (34.1%) had nonspecific codes in the 1-year postoperative period. Among the 3045 patients with both preoperative claims-based diagnosis codes and EHR-based BMI measurements, the severe obesity classification algorithm had a sensitivity 100%, specificity 71%, positive predictive value 100%, and negative predictive value 78%. The BMI categorization algorithm had good validity categorizing the last available preoperative or postoperative BMI measurements (weighted kappa [95% confidence interval]: preoperative 0.78, [0.76, 0.79]; postoperative 0.84, [0.80, 0.87]). CONCLUSIONS: Claims-based weight-related diagnosis codes had excellent validity before and after bariatric surgical operation but suboptimal availability after operation. Claims databases can be used for bariatric surgery studies of non-weight-related effectiveness and safety outcomes that are well-captured. BioMed Central 2020-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7487952/ /pubmed/32894060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01106-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Xiaojuan
Lewis, Kristina H.
Callaway, Katherine
Wharam, J. Frank
Toh, Sengwee
Suitability of administrative claims databases for bariatric surgery research – is the glass half-full or half-empty?
title Suitability of administrative claims databases for bariatric surgery research – is the glass half-full or half-empty?
title_full Suitability of administrative claims databases for bariatric surgery research – is the glass half-full or half-empty?
title_fullStr Suitability of administrative claims databases for bariatric surgery research – is the glass half-full or half-empty?
title_full_unstemmed Suitability of administrative claims databases for bariatric surgery research – is the glass half-full or half-empty?
title_short Suitability of administrative claims databases for bariatric surgery research – is the glass half-full or half-empty?
title_sort suitability of administrative claims databases for bariatric surgery research – is the glass half-full or half-empty?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7487952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32894060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01106-8
work_keys_str_mv AT lixiaojuan suitabilityofadministrativeclaimsdatabasesforbariatricsurgeryresearchistheglasshalffullorhalfempty
AT lewiskristinah suitabilityofadministrativeclaimsdatabasesforbariatricsurgeryresearchistheglasshalffullorhalfempty
AT callawaykatherine suitabilityofadministrativeclaimsdatabasesforbariatricsurgeryresearchistheglasshalffullorhalfempty
AT wharamjfrank suitabilityofadministrativeclaimsdatabasesforbariatricsurgeryresearchistheglasshalffullorhalfempty
AT tohsengwee suitabilityofadministrativeclaimsdatabasesforbariatricsurgeryresearchistheglasshalffullorhalfempty