Cargando…

Uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical resection for NSCLC: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS) has recently emerged as an alternative procedure for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, whether U-VATS has advantages over multiportal VATS (M-VATS) remains unknown. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of two databas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yan, Yueren, Huang, Qingyuan, Han, Han, Zhang, Yang, Chen, Haiquan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7488012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32907605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-020-01280-2
_version_ 1783581606487785472
author Yan, Yueren
Huang, Qingyuan
Han, Han
Zhang, Yang
Chen, Haiquan
author_facet Yan, Yueren
Huang, Qingyuan
Han, Han
Zhang, Yang
Chen, Haiquan
author_sort Yan, Yueren
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS) has recently emerged as an alternative procedure for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, whether U-VATS has advantages over multiportal VATS (M-VATS) remains unknown. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of two databases (Pubmed and Web of Science) to search comparative studies of U-VATS and M-VATS anatomical pulmonary resection for NSCLC. Operative time, blood loss, number of resected lymph nodes, drainage duration, length of postoperative stay, pain in postoperative day 1(POD1) and conversion rates were retrieved to estimate the comparison of outcomes. A subgroup analysis stratified by study type (propensity-matched analysis and randomized-controlled trial versus non-propensity matched analysis) was performed. RESULT: A total of 20 studies with 4142 patients were included in this meta-analysis. U-VATS was performed on 1869 patients, whereas the other 2173 patients underwent M-VATS. This meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in operative time (U-VATS: 146.48 ± 55.07 min versus M-VATS: 171.70 ± 79.40 min, P = 0.81), blood loss (74.49 ± 109.03 mL versus 95.48 ± 133.67 mL, P = 0.18), resected lymph nodes (17.28 ± 9.46 versus 18.31 ± 10.17, P = 0.62), conversion rate (6.18% versus 4.34%, P = 0.14), drainage duration (3.90 ± 2.94 days versus 4.44 ± 3.12 days, p = 0.09), length of postoperative stay (6.16 ± 4.40 days versus 6.45 ± 4.80 days, P = 0.22), and pain in POD1 (3.94 ± 1.68 versus 3.59 ± 2.76, p = 0.07). Subgroup analysis showed the value of PSM and RCT group consistency with overall value. CONCLUSION: This up-to-date meta-analysis shows that the perioperative outcomes of U-VATS and M-VATS anatomical pulmonary resection are equivalent. In addition, the differences in long-term outcomes of these two approaches are still unclear. Thoracic surgeons should pay more emphasize on providing high-quality and personalized surgical care for patients, to improve the survival ultimately.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7488012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74880122020-09-16 Uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical resection for NSCLC: a meta-analysis Yan, Yueren Huang, Qingyuan Han, Han Zhang, Yang Chen, Haiquan J Cardiothorac Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS) has recently emerged as an alternative procedure for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, whether U-VATS has advantages over multiportal VATS (M-VATS) remains unknown. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of two databases (Pubmed and Web of Science) to search comparative studies of U-VATS and M-VATS anatomical pulmonary resection for NSCLC. Operative time, blood loss, number of resected lymph nodes, drainage duration, length of postoperative stay, pain in postoperative day 1(POD1) and conversion rates were retrieved to estimate the comparison of outcomes. A subgroup analysis stratified by study type (propensity-matched analysis and randomized-controlled trial versus non-propensity matched analysis) was performed. RESULT: A total of 20 studies with 4142 patients were included in this meta-analysis. U-VATS was performed on 1869 patients, whereas the other 2173 patients underwent M-VATS. This meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in operative time (U-VATS: 146.48 ± 55.07 min versus M-VATS: 171.70 ± 79.40 min, P = 0.81), blood loss (74.49 ± 109.03 mL versus 95.48 ± 133.67 mL, P = 0.18), resected lymph nodes (17.28 ± 9.46 versus 18.31 ± 10.17, P = 0.62), conversion rate (6.18% versus 4.34%, P = 0.14), drainage duration (3.90 ± 2.94 days versus 4.44 ± 3.12 days, p = 0.09), length of postoperative stay (6.16 ± 4.40 days versus 6.45 ± 4.80 days, P = 0.22), and pain in POD1 (3.94 ± 1.68 versus 3.59 ± 2.76, p = 0.07). Subgroup analysis showed the value of PSM and RCT group consistency with overall value. CONCLUSION: This up-to-date meta-analysis shows that the perioperative outcomes of U-VATS and M-VATS anatomical pulmonary resection are equivalent. In addition, the differences in long-term outcomes of these two approaches are still unclear. Thoracic surgeons should pay more emphasize on providing high-quality and personalized surgical care for patients, to improve the survival ultimately. BioMed Central 2020-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7488012/ /pubmed/32907605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-020-01280-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yan, Yueren
Huang, Qingyuan
Han, Han
Zhang, Yang
Chen, Haiquan
Uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical resection for NSCLC: a meta-analysis
title Uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical resection for NSCLC: a meta-analysis
title_full Uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical resection for NSCLC: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical resection for NSCLC: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical resection for NSCLC: a meta-analysis
title_short Uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical resection for NSCLC: a meta-analysis
title_sort uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical resection for nsclc: a meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7488012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32907605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-020-01280-2
work_keys_str_mv AT yanyueren uniportalversusmultiportalvideoassistedthoracoscopicanatomicalresectionfornsclcametaanalysis
AT huangqingyuan uniportalversusmultiportalvideoassistedthoracoscopicanatomicalresectionfornsclcametaanalysis
AT hanhan uniportalversusmultiportalvideoassistedthoracoscopicanatomicalresectionfornsclcametaanalysis
AT zhangyang uniportalversusmultiportalvideoassistedthoracoscopicanatomicalresectionfornsclcametaanalysis
AT chenhaiquan uniportalversusmultiportalvideoassistedthoracoscopicanatomicalresectionfornsclcametaanalysis