Cargando…

Ocular ultrasonography of sea turtles

BACKGROUND: Environmental changes contribute to the development of ophthalmic diseases in sea turtles, but information on their eye biometrics is scarce. The aim of this study was to describe ophthalmic ultrasonographic features of four different sea turtle species; Caretta caretta (Loggerhead turtl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muramoto, Caterina, Cardoso-Brito, Vinícius, Raposo, Ana Cláudia, Pires, Thais Torres, Oriá, Arianne Pontes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7488042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32912266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-020-00551-1
_version_ 1783581613319258112
author Muramoto, Caterina
Cardoso-Brito, Vinícius
Raposo, Ana Cláudia
Pires, Thais Torres
Oriá, Arianne Pontes
author_facet Muramoto, Caterina
Cardoso-Brito, Vinícius
Raposo, Ana Cláudia
Pires, Thais Torres
Oriá, Arianne Pontes
author_sort Muramoto, Caterina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Environmental changes contribute to the development of ophthalmic diseases in sea turtles, but information on their eye biometrics is scarce. The aim of this study was to describe ophthalmic ultrasonographic features of four different sea turtle species; Caretta caretta (Loggerhead turtle; n = 10), Chelonia mydas (Green turtle; n = 8), Eretmochelys imbricata (Hawksbill turtle; n = 8) and Lepidochelys olivacea (Olive ridley; n = 6) under human care. Corneal thickness, scleral ossicle width and thickness, anterior chamber depth, axial length of the lens, vitreous chamber depth and axial globe length were measured by B-mode sonography with a linear transducer. Carapace size and animal weight were recorded. A sonographic description of the eye structures was established. RESULTS: The four species presented an ovate eyeball, a relatively thin cornea, and a small-sized lens positioned rostrally in the eye bulb, near the cornea, resulting in a shallow anterior chamber. The scleral ossicles did not prevent the evaluation of intraocular structures, even with a rotated eye or closed eyelids; image formation beyond the ossicles and measurements of all proposed structures were possible. B-mode sonography was easily performed in all animals studied. The sonographic characteristics of the eye were similar among the four species. Since there was a correlation between the size of the eye structures and the size of the individual, especially its carapace size, the differences found between E. imbricata and Caretta caretta are believed to be due to their overall difference in size. CONCLUSIONS: Sonography is a valuable tool in ophthalmic evaluation of these species. Only minor differences were found between the species in this study, reinforcing their phylogenetic proximity and their similar functions and habitats.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7488042
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74880422020-09-16 Ocular ultrasonography of sea turtles Muramoto, Caterina Cardoso-Brito, Vinícius Raposo, Ana Cláudia Pires, Thais Torres Oriá, Arianne Pontes Acta Vet Scand Research BACKGROUND: Environmental changes contribute to the development of ophthalmic diseases in sea turtles, but information on their eye biometrics is scarce. The aim of this study was to describe ophthalmic ultrasonographic features of four different sea turtle species; Caretta caretta (Loggerhead turtle; n = 10), Chelonia mydas (Green turtle; n = 8), Eretmochelys imbricata (Hawksbill turtle; n = 8) and Lepidochelys olivacea (Olive ridley; n = 6) under human care. Corneal thickness, scleral ossicle width and thickness, anterior chamber depth, axial length of the lens, vitreous chamber depth and axial globe length were measured by B-mode sonography with a linear transducer. Carapace size and animal weight were recorded. A sonographic description of the eye structures was established. RESULTS: The four species presented an ovate eyeball, a relatively thin cornea, and a small-sized lens positioned rostrally in the eye bulb, near the cornea, resulting in a shallow anterior chamber. The scleral ossicles did not prevent the evaluation of intraocular structures, even with a rotated eye or closed eyelids; image formation beyond the ossicles and measurements of all proposed structures were possible. B-mode sonography was easily performed in all animals studied. The sonographic characteristics of the eye were similar among the four species. Since there was a correlation between the size of the eye structures and the size of the individual, especially its carapace size, the differences found between E. imbricata and Caretta caretta are believed to be due to their overall difference in size. CONCLUSIONS: Sonography is a valuable tool in ophthalmic evaluation of these species. Only minor differences were found between the species in this study, reinforcing their phylogenetic proximity and their similar functions and habitats. BioMed Central 2020-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7488042/ /pubmed/32912266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-020-00551-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Muramoto, Caterina
Cardoso-Brito, Vinícius
Raposo, Ana Cláudia
Pires, Thais Torres
Oriá, Arianne Pontes
Ocular ultrasonography of sea turtles
title Ocular ultrasonography of sea turtles
title_full Ocular ultrasonography of sea turtles
title_fullStr Ocular ultrasonography of sea turtles
title_full_unstemmed Ocular ultrasonography of sea turtles
title_short Ocular ultrasonography of sea turtles
title_sort ocular ultrasonography of sea turtles
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7488042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32912266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-020-00551-1
work_keys_str_mv AT muramotocaterina ocularultrasonographyofseaturtles
AT cardosobritovinicius ocularultrasonographyofseaturtles
AT raposoanaclaudia ocularultrasonographyofseaturtles
AT piresthaistorres ocularultrasonographyofseaturtles
AT oriaariannepontes ocularultrasonographyofseaturtles