Cargando…

Combined application of single-energy metal artifact reduction and reconstruction techniques in patients with Cochlear implants

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to develop an effective method of reducing metal artifacts in cochlear implant (CI) electrodes. METHODS: The temporal bones of 30 patients (34 ears) after CI were examined with 320-detector row computed tomography, which was evaluated by two senior radiologi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wei, Fanqin, Li, Jiahui, Zhou, Chunxiang, Li, Yun, Wang, Xianren, Huang, Bixue, Sun, Qiyang, Xiong, Guanxia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7488066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32907631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-020-00462-1
_version_ 1783581618536972288
author Wei, Fanqin
Li, Jiahui
Zhou, Chunxiang
Li, Yun
Wang, Xianren
Huang, Bixue
Sun, Qiyang
Xiong, Guanxia
author_facet Wei, Fanqin
Li, Jiahui
Zhou, Chunxiang
Li, Yun
Wang, Xianren
Huang, Bixue
Sun, Qiyang
Xiong, Guanxia
author_sort Wei, Fanqin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to develop an effective method of reducing metal artifacts in cochlear implant (CI) electrodes. METHODS: The temporal bones of 30 patients (34 ears) after CI were examined with 320-detector row computed tomography, which was evaluated by two senior radiologists using a double-blind method. Noise, artifact index, signal-to-noise ratio, and the subjective image quality score were compared before versus after using single-energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR). The electrode position, single electrode visibility, and electrode count were evaluated using SEMAR combined with either multi-planar reconstruction (MPR) or maximum intensity projection. RESULTS: The two radiologists’ measurements had good consistency. SEMAR significantly reduced the image noise and artifacts index and significantly improved the signal-to-noise ratio and subjective image quality score (P < 0.01). The combination of SEMAR with MPR was conducive to accurate assessment of electrode position and single-electrode visibility. The combination of SEMAR with MIP facilitated accurate and intuitive matching of the assessed electrode count with the number of electrodes implanted during the operation (P = 0.062). CONCLUSION: SEMAR significantly reduces metal artifacts generated by CI electrodes and improves the quality of computed tomography images. The combination of SEMAR with MPR and maximum intensity projection is beneficial for evaluating the position and number of CI electrodes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7488066
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74880662020-09-16 Combined application of single-energy metal artifact reduction and reconstruction techniques in patients with Cochlear implants Wei, Fanqin Li, Jiahui Zhou, Chunxiang Li, Yun Wang, Xianren Huang, Bixue Sun, Qiyang Xiong, Guanxia J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Original Research Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to develop an effective method of reducing metal artifacts in cochlear implant (CI) electrodes. METHODS: The temporal bones of 30 patients (34 ears) after CI were examined with 320-detector row computed tomography, which was evaluated by two senior radiologists using a double-blind method. Noise, artifact index, signal-to-noise ratio, and the subjective image quality score were compared before versus after using single-energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR). The electrode position, single electrode visibility, and electrode count were evaluated using SEMAR combined with either multi-planar reconstruction (MPR) or maximum intensity projection. RESULTS: The two radiologists’ measurements had good consistency. SEMAR significantly reduced the image noise and artifacts index and significantly improved the signal-to-noise ratio and subjective image quality score (P < 0.01). The combination of SEMAR with MPR was conducive to accurate assessment of electrode position and single-electrode visibility. The combination of SEMAR with MIP facilitated accurate and intuitive matching of the assessed electrode count with the number of electrodes implanted during the operation (P = 0.062). CONCLUSION: SEMAR significantly reduces metal artifacts generated by CI electrodes and improves the quality of computed tomography images. The combination of SEMAR with MPR and maximum intensity projection is beneficial for evaluating the position and number of CI electrodes. BioMed Central 2020-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7488066/ /pubmed/32907631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-020-00462-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Wei, Fanqin
Li, Jiahui
Zhou, Chunxiang
Li, Yun
Wang, Xianren
Huang, Bixue
Sun, Qiyang
Xiong, Guanxia
Combined application of single-energy metal artifact reduction and reconstruction techniques in patients with Cochlear implants
title Combined application of single-energy metal artifact reduction and reconstruction techniques in patients with Cochlear implants
title_full Combined application of single-energy metal artifact reduction and reconstruction techniques in patients with Cochlear implants
title_fullStr Combined application of single-energy metal artifact reduction and reconstruction techniques in patients with Cochlear implants
title_full_unstemmed Combined application of single-energy metal artifact reduction and reconstruction techniques in patients with Cochlear implants
title_short Combined application of single-energy metal artifact reduction and reconstruction techniques in patients with Cochlear implants
title_sort combined application of single-energy metal artifact reduction and reconstruction techniques in patients with cochlear implants
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7488066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32907631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-020-00462-1
work_keys_str_mv AT weifanqin combinedapplicationofsingleenergymetalartifactreductionandreconstructiontechniquesinpatientswithcochlearimplants
AT lijiahui combinedapplicationofsingleenergymetalartifactreductionandreconstructiontechniquesinpatientswithcochlearimplants
AT zhouchunxiang combinedapplicationofsingleenergymetalartifactreductionandreconstructiontechniquesinpatientswithcochlearimplants
AT liyun combinedapplicationofsingleenergymetalartifactreductionandreconstructiontechniquesinpatientswithcochlearimplants
AT wangxianren combinedapplicationofsingleenergymetalartifactreductionandreconstructiontechniquesinpatientswithcochlearimplants
AT huangbixue combinedapplicationofsingleenergymetalartifactreductionandreconstructiontechniquesinpatientswithcochlearimplants
AT sunqiyang combinedapplicationofsingleenergymetalartifactreductionandreconstructiontechniquesinpatientswithcochlearimplants
AT xiongguanxia combinedapplicationofsingleenergymetalartifactreductionandreconstructiontechniquesinpatientswithcochlearimplants