Cargando…
A comparison of BeadChip and WGS genotyping outputs using partial validation by sanger sequencing
BACKGROUND: Head-to-head comparison of BeadChip and WGS/WES genotyping techniques for their precision is far from straightforward. A tool for validation of high-throughput genotyping calls such as Sanger sequencing is neither scalable nor practical for large-scale DNA processing. Here we report a cr...
Autores principales: | Danilov, Kirill A., Nikogosov, Dimitri A., Musienko, Sergey V., Baranova, Ancha V. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7488117/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32912136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-06919-x |
Ejemplares similares
-
Comparing BeadChip and WGS Genotyping: Non-Technical Failed Calling Is Attributable to Additional Variation within the Probe Target Sequence
por: Gershoni, Moran, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
R/Bioconductor software for Illumina's Infinium whole-genome genotyping BeadChips
por: Ritchie, Matthew E., et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Comparing genotyping algorithms for Illumina's Infinium whole-genome SNP BeadChips
por: Ritchie, Matthew E, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Comment on “ApoE e4e4 Genotype and Mortality With COVID-19 in UK Biobank” by Kuo et al
por: Nikogosov, Dimitri A, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Illumina WG-6 BeadChip strips should be normalized separately
por: Shi, Wei, et al.
Publicado: (2009)