Cargando…
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in trauma patients: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has evolved considerably over the past two decades and has been gradually utilized in severe trauma. However, the indications for the use of ECMO in trauma remain uncertain and the clinical outcomes are different. We performed a systematic revie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7488245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32912280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-020-00331-2 |
_version_ | 1783581654866984960 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Changtian Zhang, Lei Qin, Tao Xi, Zhilong Sun, Lei Wu, Haiwei Li, Demin |
author_facet | Wang, Changtian Zhang, Lei Qin, Tao Xi, Zhilong Sun, Lei Wu, Haiwei Li, Demin |
author_sort | Wang, Changtian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has evolved considerably over the past two decades and has been gradually utilized in severe trauma. However, the indications for the use of ECMO in trauma remain uncertain and the clinical outcomes are different. We performed a systematic review to provide an overall estimate of the current performance of ECMO in the treatment of trauma patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched PubMed and MEDLINE databases up to the end of December 2019 for studies on ECMO in trauma. The PRISMA statement was followed. Data on demographics of the patient, mechanism of injury, injury severity scores (ISS), details of ECMO strategies, and clinical outcome were extracted. RESULTS: A total of 58 articles (19 retrospective reports and 39 case reports) were deemed eligible and included. In total, 548 patients received ECMO treatment for severe trauma (adult 517; children 31; mean age of adults 34.9 ± 12.3 years). Blunt trauma (85.4%) was the primary injury mechanism, and 128 patients had traumatic brain injury (TBI). The mean ISS was 38.1 ± 15.0. A total of 71.3% of patients were initially treated with VV ECMO, and 24.5% were placed on VA ECMO. The median time on ECMO was 9.6 days, and the median time to ECMO was 5.7 days. A total of 60% of patients received initially heparin anticoagulation. Bleeding (22.9%) and thrombosis (19%) were the most common complications. Ischemia of the lower extremities occurred in 9 patients. The overall hospital mortality was 30.3%. CONCLUSIONS: ECMO has been gradually utilized in a lifesaving capacity in severe trauma patients, and the feasibility and advantages of this technique are becoming widely accepted. The safety and effectiveness of ECMO in trauma require further study. Several problems with ECMO in trauma, including the role of VA-ECMO, the time to institute ECMO, and the anticoagulation strategy remain controversial and must be solved in future studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7488245 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74882452020-09-16 Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in trauma patients: a systematic review Wang, Changtian Zhang, Lei Qin, Tao Xi, Zhilong Sun, Lei Wu, Haiwei Li, Demin World J Emerg Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has evolved considerably over the past two decades and has been gradually utilized in severe trauma. However, the indications for the use of ECMO in trauma remain uncertain and the clinical outcomes are different. We performed a systematic review to provide an overall estimate of the current performance of ECMO in the treatment of trauma patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched PubMed and MEDLINE databases up to the end of December 2019 for studies on ECMO in trauma. The PRISMA statement was followed. Data on demographics of the patient, mechanism of injury, injury severity scores (ISS), details of ECMO strategies, and clinical outcome were extracted. RESULTS: A total of 58 articles (19 retrospective reports and 39 case reports) were deemed eligible and included. In total, 548 patients received ECMO treatment for severe trauma (adult 517; children 31; mean age of adults 34.9 ± 12.3 years). Blunt trauma (85.4%) was the primary injury mechanism, and 128 patients had traumatic brain injury (TBI). The mean ISS was 38.1 ± 15.0. A total of 71.3% of patients were initially treated with VV ECMO, and 24.5% were placed on VA ECMO. The median time on ECMO was 9.6 days, and the median time to ECMO was 5.7 days. A total of 60% of patients received initially heparin anticoagulation. Bleeding (22.9%) and thrombosis (19%) were the most common complications. Ischemia of the lower extremities occurred in 9 patients. The overall hospital mortality was 30.3%. CONCLUSIONS: ECMO has been gradually utilized in a lifesaving capacity in severe trauma patients, and the feasibility and advantages of this technique are becoming widely accepted. The safety and effectiveness of ECMO in trauma require further study. Several problems with ECMO in trauma, including the role of VA-ECMO, the time to institute ECMO, and the anticoagulation strategy remain controversial and must be solved in future studies. BioMed Central 2020-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7488245/ /pubmed/32912280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-020-00331-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wang, Changtian Zhang, Lei Qin, Tao Xi, Zhilong Sun, Lei Wu, Haiwei Li, Demin Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in trauma patients: a systematic review |
title | Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in trauma patients: a systematic review |
title_full | Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in trauma patients: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in trauma patients: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in trauma patients: a systematic review |
title_short | Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in trauma patients: a systematic review |
title_sort | extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in trauma patients: a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7488245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32912280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-020-00331-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangchangtian extracorporealmembraneoxygenationintraumapatientsasystematicreview AT zhanglei extracorporealmembraneoxygenationintraumapatientsasystematicreview AT qintao extracorporealmembraneoxygenationintraumapatientsasystematicreview AT xizhilong extracorporealmembraneoxygenationintraumapatientsasystematicreview AT sunlei extracorporealmembraneoxygenationintraumapatientsasystematicreview AT wuhaiwei extracorporealmembraneoxygenationintraumapatientsasystematicreview AT lidemin extracorporealmembraneoxygenationintraumapatientsasystematicreview |