Cargando…
Validity of Cognitive Tests for Non-human Animals: Pitfalls and Prospects
Comparative psychology assesses cognitive abilities and capacities of non-human animals and humans. Based on performance differences and similarities in various species in cognitive tests, it is inferred how their minds work and reconstructed how cognition might have evolved. Critically, such specie...
Autores principales: | Schubiger, Michèle N., Fichtel, Claudia, Burkart, Judith M. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7488350/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32982822 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01835 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Does opportunistic testing bias cognitive performance in primates? Learning from drop-outs
por: Schubiger, Michèle N., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Can animal data predict human outcome? Problems and pitfalls of translational animal research
por: Martić-Kehl, Marianne I., et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Editorial: Parochial Altruism: Pitfalls and Prospects
por: Rusch, Hannes, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
The Role of Animal Cognition in Human-Wildlife Interactions
por: Goumas, Madeleine, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Editorial: Humans in an Animal's World—How Non-human Animals Perceive and Interact With Humans
por: Nawroth, Christian, et al.
Publicado: (2021)