Cargando…

Spotlight on Ki67 as a prognostic marker in early breast cancer: all that glitters may not be gold

Kang and colleagues evaluated on a case series of 1848 breast cancer (BC) patients operated for a first primary ER positive HER2 negative BC if Ki67 expression is a significant prognostic factor only when PgR expression is low. The authors concluded that Ki67 with 10% cut off value is a prognostic f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maltoni, Roberta, Palleschi, Michela, Ravaioli, Sara, Tumedei, Maria Maddalena, Altini, Mattia, Bravaccini, Sara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7488398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32917222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13000-020-01024-9
_version_ 1783581681230282752
author Maltoni, Roberta
Palleschi, Michela
Ravaioli, Sara
Tumedei, Maria Maddalena
Altini, Mattia
Bravaccini, Sara
author_facet Maltoni, Roberta
Palleschi, Michela
Ravaioli, Sara
Tumedei, Maria Maddalena
Altini, Mattia
Bravaccini, Sara
author_sort Maltoni, Roberta
collection PubMed
description Kang and colleagues evaluated on a case series of 1848 breast cancer (BC) patients operated for a first primary ER positive HER2 negative BC if Ki67 expression is a significant prognostic factor only when PgR expression is low. The authors concluded that Ki67 with 10% cut off value is a prognostic factor only under low PgR expression level in early BC. We would like to underline, that as already stated in our previous papers, we believe that proliferation is important to define the decision-making of adjuvant therapies in early BC. The issue on Ki67 detection is the poor reproducibility due to different antibody clones, platforms and scoring methods. Not less important is that different Ki67 cut off values have been used by San Gallen guidelines and changed overtime. Then, despite the interesting results, we believe it would be better to use Ki67 biomarker in according to the standard Ki67 cut off according to San Gallen guidelines. Nowadays, standardization and optimization of Ki67 is still an urgent need.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7488398
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74883982020-09-16 Spotlight on Ki67 as a prognostic marker in early breast cancer: all that glitters may not be gold Maltoni, Roberta Palleschi, Michela Ravaioli, Sara Tumedei, Maria Maddalena Altini, Mattia Bravaccini, Sara Diagn Pathol Commentary Kang and colleagues evaluated on a case series of 1848 breast cancer (BC) patients operated for a first primary ER positive HER2 negative BC if Ki67 expression is a significant prognostic factor only when PgR expression is low. The authors concluded that Ki67 with 10% cut off value is a prognostic factor only under low PgR expression level in early BC. We would like to underline, that as already stated in our previous papers, we believe that proliferation is important to define the decision-making of adjuvant therapies in early BC. The issue on Ki67 detection is the poor reproducibility due to different antibody clones, platforms and scoring methods. Not less important is that different Ki67 cut off values have been used by San Gallen guidelines and changed overtime. Then, despite the interesting results, we believe it would be better to use Ki67 biomarker in according to the standard Ki67 cut off according to San Gallen guidelines. Nowadays, standardization and optimization of Ki67 is still an urgent need. BioMed Central 2020-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7488398/ /pubmed/32917222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13000-020-01024-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Commentary
Maltoni, Roberta
Palleschi, Michela
Ravaioli, Sara
Tumedei, Maria Maddalena
Altini, Mattia
Bravaccini, Sara
Spotlight on Ki67 as a prognostic marker in early breast cancer: all that glitters may not be gold
title Spotlight on Ki67 as a prognostic marker in early breast cancer: all that glitters may not be gold
title_full Spotlight on Ki67 as a prognostic marker in early breast cancer: all that glitters may not be gold
title_fullStr Spotlight on Ki67 as a prognostic marker in early breast cancer: all that glitters may not be gold
title_full_unstemmed Spotlight on Ki67 as a prognostic marker in early breast cancer: all that glitters may not be gold
title_short Spotlight on Ki67 as a prognostic marker in early breast cancer: all that glitters may not be gold
title_sort spotlight on ki67 as a prognostic marker in early breast cancer: all that glitters may not be gold
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7488398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32917222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13000-020-01024-9
work_keys_str_mv AT maltoniroberta spotlightonki67asaprognosticmarkerinearlybreastcancerallthatglittersmaynotbegold
AT palleschimichela spotlightonki67asaprognosticmarkerinearlybreastcancerallthatglittersmaynotbegold
AT ravaiolisara spotlightonki67asaprognosticmarkerinearlybreastcancerallthatglittersmaynotbegold
AT tumedeimariamaddalena spotlightonki67asaprognosticmarkerinearlybreastcancerallthatglittersmaynotbegold
AT altinimattia spotlightonki67asaprognosticmarkerinearlybreastcancerallthatglittersmaynotbegold
AT bravaccinisara spotlightonki67asaprognosticmarkerinearlybreastcancerallthatglittersmaynotbegold